Ci pensate: la vita del pianeta messa in gioco dall'ingordigia giudaica

[Patrizio (POL)]

Incredibili tensioni stanno creandosi - nonostante il mondo arabo sia governato in gran parte da leadership moderate filo-occidentali e accomodanti nei confronti del sionismo - grazie alla svolta impressa dal sionismo puro di Sharon.
Sempre loro, sempre il Medio Oriente, la questione creata dalla presenza ebraica.
La conflagrazione che potrebbe scatenarsi come un domino attorno alla questione ebraica mediorientale, sarebbe di una portata drammaticamente immaginabile.
Ora capiamo a cosa è servita la massiccia propaganda olocaustica con cui hanno lavato il cervello agli europei negli ultimi decenni: per tenerci in uno stato di succube senso di solpa in modo che non potessimo reagire di fronte alla programmata escalation sionista. Praticamente, ci hanni ipnotizzati.
Ora evidentemente si sentono sicuri, hanno pensato che nessuno avrebbe più osato protestare o intromettersi nel loro operato, e hanno dato il via all'ultima fase - sicuri anche della protezione matematica della superpotenza USA, completamente controllata dalla lobby ebraica.
Saprà l'Europa risvegliarsi da questa malìa in cui è tenuta dall'omnipervasiva propaganda ebraica? Probabilmente sì, perché la perfidia razzista dell'ebraismo si sta rendendo visibile sempre più; anche se sarà necessario liberarsi di tutti i fantocci filo-sionisti e uomini di paglia incistati nelle nostre istituzioni.

[Ichthys]

È una parola!
I giudei hanno un potere immenso. Pensa, hanno bombardato Milosevic per crimini contro i kossovari, hanno bombardato per motivi simili (ufficialmente!) Hussein, ma Israele no per crimini contro i palestinesi che contrattaccano con sistemi terribili si, ma rudimentali.
Deportazioni, rastrellamenti, esecuzioni sommarie, esperimenti sui prigionieri... tutto regolare. La stessa ONU ha paura di dire la sua con decisione per paura di risultare antisemita!

P.S. ti ho inviato un messaggio privato.

[Free]

E che palle con questo olocausto, io nei giornali e nelle notizie ufficiali non lo sento mai menzionare, ora che hanno dichiarato ufficialmente guerra e occupato i territori si trovano in una posizione di isolamento rispetto alla comunità internazionale, quindi possono essere fatte nuove proposte per risolvere il problema Palestinese.

[oleg]

Purtroppo Patrizio ha ragione Free.

L`olocausto gioca un ruolo decisivo nella politica Israeliana. Senza di esso gli Israeliani non sarebbero mai riusciti a commettere sistematicamente tutti i soprusi che commettono in medio oriente ed uscirne come vittime. (Allo stesso tempo agisce come una forma religiosa per la maggior parte della popolazione israeliana, che e' atea.)

E grazie al senso di colpa che ci e' stato inculcato dai media che siamo incapaci di difendereci o ribellarci a tanta violenza.

Chi critica Israele=antisemita=nazista.

Addirittura nell`Universita' di Liverpool in enghilterra e' stato proibito di criticare apertamente le politiche sioniste in terra santa peche' chi lo fa a parere loro e un antisemita. Sembra incredibile;

http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/02/03/Je...aph300302.html

Gli UZA hanno bombardato la Jugoslavia mentre ad Israele che compie crimini ben peggiori gli dona diversi miliardi di dollari ogni anno in equipaggiamento militare high tech.

Non c`e' da stupirsi visto che i media mericani sono completamente controllati dalla lobby ebraica;

http://www.natall.com/who-rules-america/












Free E che palle con questo olocausto, io nei giornali e nelle notizie ufficiali non lo sento mai menzionare, ora che hanno dichiarato ufficialmente guerra e occupato i territori si trovano in una posizione di isolamento rispetto alla comunità internazionale, quindi possono essere fatte nuove proposte per risolvere il problema Palestinese

[Felix (POL)]

quando ci libereremo dal'incantesimo ebraico?! quando apriremo gli occhi di fronte al fatto che gli ebrei sono un popolo come un'altro, senza privilegi particolari e senza una coscienza specialmente limpida?! Quando smetteremo di vedere in loro i poveri discendenti di sopravvissuti ai cosiddetti campi di sterminio?!
ma quando ciò avverrà forse sarà troppo tardi e sarà già scoppiata la bomba geopolitica che hanno creato in Medio Oriente...

[I'm Hate]

Condivido tutto cio' che avete detto,spero siate tutti camerati qua' cosi' dimostriamo che nonostante i vari rauti e fini,l'area neofascista ha ancora consapevolezza,e lucidita' politica.
Questo solo per rispondere a certi che volevano l'antisionismo solo a sinistra.Oltretutto il loro antisionismo e' ...monco.
Non basta denunciare i fin troppo visibili crimini dei giudei in palestina,bisogna come voi avete fatto,anche denunciare la fandonia olocaustica sul quale si basa lo stato pirata israeliano e
l'asservimento quasi totale dei media al giudaismo.
saluti fascisti!
..e morte ai sionisti!

[white_rage]

Caro Patrizio, mi preme ancora una volta dissentire
riguardo alle generalizzazioni sulla massa ebraica.

Gli ebrei sono un gruppo molto variegato di esseri umani. Alcuni sono marcatamente "ariani", altri sono tipicamente mediterrranei, infine ve ne sono di neri.

Alcuni sono dediti al commercio, altri riescono nelle matematiche, altri sono rozzi contadini. Alcuni sono avari, altri sono generosi. Molti sono brava gente, alcuni sono individui eccezionali, alcuni sono viscide serpi.

Ma la mistica dell'ebreo univocamente parassita e demoniaco per natura e' una credenza irrazionale che non corrisponde ai dati empirici.

Io insisto nel dire che le masse ebree sono manipolate da una ristretta oligarchia "ariana" che li usa come scudo umano; e che se la massa ebrea non rompe l'incantesimo che li imprigiona nella paura e nel sentirsi "diversi", tale oligarchia li usera' fino a distruggerli. E' d'altronde quello che gia' sta succedendo: Israele che finanzia Hamas!

Ma ci vuole tanto a capire che i poteri occulti non sono ebrei ma usano l'ebreo come agente e contabile e scudo umano?

Inoltre, ma ci vuole tanto a capire che le religioni sono una SOVRASTRUTTURA rispetto all'essere come essere umani, e che non esiste una entita' mistica inesorabile chiamata ebraismo che renda l'ebreo una specie di bomba a tempo?

Esiste si' un particolare DNA che gli ebrei ortodossi mirano a presenvare tramite il riprodursi fra consanguinei e tramite la discendenza MATERNA. Ma anche qui il DNA e' un supporto per certi fini particolari, ma l'individuo resta libero. Cio' che e' MALE e' niente altro che il fanatismo religioso e il senso di essere totalmente separati dagli altri. Nella misura in cui la religione provoca cio', la religione VIENE DAL DIAVOLO.

La situazione e' la seguente: esistono delle oligarchie occulte che usano popoli e religioni per propri fini. In particolare stanno usando un gruppo di esseri umani che hanno etichettato "ebrei" e che in parte sono portatori di certe caratteristiche genetiche, di per se ne' buone ne' cattive.

Questa oligarchia non crede nella religione, avendola INVENTATA in massima parte. E questa oligarchia non esita a disfarsi di coloro che nel passato usava, qualora si presenti l'occorrenza.

Questo e' cio' che potrebbe accadere alla massa ebraica: contabili, maggiordomi, "sacerdoti" , carne da macello.
UOMO SVEGLIATI!

Originally posted by Patrizio
Incredibili tensioni stanno creandosi - nonostante il mondo arabo sia governato in gran parte da leadership moderate filo-occidentali e accomodanti nei confronti del sionismo - grazie alla svolta impressa dal sionismo puro di Sharon.
Sempre loro, sempre il Medio Oriente, la questione creata dalla presenza ebraica.
La conflagrazione che potrebbe scatenarsi come un domino attorno alla questione ebraica mediorientale, sarebbe di una portata drammaticamente immaginabile.
Ora capiamo a cosa è servita la massiccia propaganda olocaustica con cui hanno lavato il cervello agli europei negli ultimi decenni: per tenerci in uno stato di succube senso di solpa in modo che non potessimo reagire di fronte alla programmata escalation sionista. Praticamente, ci hanni ipnotizzati.
Ora evidentemente si sentono sicuri, hanno pensato che nessuno avrebbe più osato protestare o intromettersi nel loro operato, e hanno dato il via all'ultima fase - sicuri anche della protezione matematica della superpotenza USA, completamente controllata dalla lobby ebraica.
Saprà l'Europa risvegliarsi da questa malìa in cui è tenuta dall'omnipervasiva propaganda ebraica? Probabilmente sì, perché la perfidia razzista dell'ebraismo si sta rendendo visibile sempre più; anche se sarà necessario liberarsi di tutti i fantocci filo-sionisti e uomini di paglia incistati nelle nostre istituzioni.

[white_rage]

This article appears in the January 18, 2002 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.
Israeli Roots of Hamas Are Being Exposed
by Dean Andromidas

Speaking in Jerusalem Dec. 20, U.S. Ambassador to Israel Daniel Kurtzer made the connection between the growth of the Islamic fundamentalist groups Hamas and Islamic Jihad, and Israel's promotion of the Islamic movement as a counter to the Palestinian nationalist movement. Kurtzer's comments come very close to EIR's own presentation of the evidence of Israel's instrumental role in establishing Hamas, and its ongoing control of that organization.

Kurtzer said that the growth of the Islamic movement in the Palestinian territories in recent decades—"with the tacit support of Israel"—was "not totally unrelated" to the emergence of Hamas and Islamic Jihad and their terrorist attacks against Israel. Kurtzer explained that during the 1980s, when the Islamic movement began to flourish in the West Bank and Gaza, "Israel perceived it to be better to have people turning toward religion rather than toward a nationalistic cause [the Palestinian Liberation Organization—ed.]." It therefore did little to stop the flow of money to mosques and other religious institutions, rather than to schools.

According to the Dec. 21 Israeli daily Ha'aretz, Kurtzer made these extraordinary statements at a seminar on religion and politics sponsored by Oz V'Shalom-Netivot Shalom, a largely Anglo-American organization that promotes peace between Israelis and Palestinians. Rabbi Dr. Aharon Lichtenstein, the head of Har Etzion Yeshiva in Alon Shvut, who is an active advocate of a just regional peace, also spoke. Kurtzer said that as a result of the growth of Islam at the expense of education, there are now Palestinians who are "determined terrorists that use religious beliefs in a perverted way to appeal to the masses."

Kurtzer said that cultural and religious interaction is potentially a way to "build bridges." But instead, "the perverted use of religion in the region is today becoming one of the great challenges for the years ahead." He said that there is no "inherent component" in Islam that advocates violence. But one of the five principles of Islam, jihad—resistance—"in classic religious associations connotes religious belief and fervor, not violence." But extremists have distorted the meaning of jihad, so it now has a connotation of violence in the service of a religious purpose.
The Enemy of My Enemy Is My Friend

This statement is extraordinary given the fact that Kurtzer is a very senior diplomat, having held the post of Ambassador to Egypt just prior to going on to Tel Aviv. He is also an Orthodox Jew who is not shy of criticizing the extreme anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic views held by certain Arab circles. But Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon rarely grants the United States' highest representative in Israel an official audience.

The ambassador's comments are an acknowledgment of what any serious Middle East observers knows: Hamas has always been seen as a tool by which Israel could undermine the nationalist movement led by Palestinian Authority President and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Chairman Yasser Arafat. Similar statements by Arafat have been dismissed by Israel as "cranky" propaganda. In an interview with the Dec. 11 Italian daily Corriere della Sera , Arafat said, "We are doing everything to stop the violence. But Hamas is a creature of Israel which at the time of Prime Minister [Yitzhak] Shamir [the late 1980s, when Hamas arose], gave them money and more than 700 institutions, among them schools, universities and mosques. Even [former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak] Rabin ended up admitting it, when I charged him with it, in the presence of [Egpytian President Hosni] Mubarak."

To the Italian daily L'Espresso, Arafat laid out the reasons for this support. "Hamas was constituted with the support of Israel. The aim was to create an organization antagonistic to the PLO. They received financing and training from Israel. They have continued to benefit from permits and authorizations, while we have been limited, even to build a tomato factory. Rabin himself defined it as a fatal error. Some collaborationists of Israel are involved in these [terror] attacks," he said. "We have proof, and we are placing it at the disposal of the Italian government."

On one level the support for Hamas is simply the application of the old saying, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." Indeed, in the minds of crude Israeli ultra-nationalists and fascists such as Sharon and his faction, this is indeed the case. Sharon is not interested in peace and therefore is not concerned that the violence and needless deaths of Israelis and Palestinians continue. In the Jan. 3 Ha'aretz, Yossi Sarid, chairman of the Meretz party, wrote, "What does frighten Sharon ... is any prospect or sign of calm or moderation. If the situation were to calm down and stabilize, Sharon would have to return to the negotiating table and, in the wake of pressure from within and without, he would have to raise serious proposals for an agreement. This moment terrifies Sharon and he wants to put it off for as long as he possibly can." In contrast, Sarid said that Sharon understands "that the terrorists and those who give them asylum are not the real enemies. Instead, the real enemies are the moderates.... You fight terrorists—a pretty simple operation—but you must talk with moderates, and this is a very tricky, if not dangerous, business."

More important for the survival of not only the Palestinian people, but especially Israel itself, is the dangerous role of the puppetmasters outside the region, who are manipulating both sides of this deadly game as part of their own demonic plans to spread the policy of a "clash of civilizations." In this regard, Sharon, and his "Greater Israel" policy, is just as much a puppet as the Palestinian, strapped with explosives, who blows himself up at an Israeli bus station.
Two Decades of Undermining Arafat

Given the level of control that the Israeli intelligence services such as the Shin Bet and Mossad have been able to exert over the Palestinian territories during the last 35 years of Israeli occupation, the capability to manipulate militant and violent organizations, such as those associated with Hamas, should not surprise anyone familiar with intelligence and even routine police operations. This should be obvious, considering that Israel has routinely recruited thousands of collaborators and provocateurs among the tens of thousands of Palestinians who have passed through Israeli prisons in over 35 years of its occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Most convincing is a comparison of the development of Hamas, Islamic Jihad and their antecedents, and the growing national and international legitimacy of the PLO and its undisputed leader, Arafat.

Hamas is an acronym for Harafat al-Muqawama Al-Islamiyya, or Islamic Resistance Movement. Its spiritual leader is Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, who, despite his fiery anti-Israeli sermons, has had an unusual relationship with the Israeli authorities. In 1973, Yassin established the Islamic Association—at a time when it was Israeli policy to promote what Ambassador Kurtzer refers to as the "Islamic movement."

One might ask: Why should Israel promote an Islamic movement which later turns around and attacks it? How could the Israeli secret services be taken in by a Yassin? They weren't. The simple fact is, that the stated policy of Hamas is simply the flip side of Sharon's "Greater Israel" policy that refuses to seek a territorial compromise. The Hamas charter in 1988 stated, "The land of Palestine has been an Islamic Waqf throughout the generations, and until the Day of Resurrection, no one can renounce it or part of it, or abandon it or part of it.... Peace initiatives, the so-called peace initiatives, are all contraray to the beliefs of Hamas, for renouncing any part of Palestine means renouncing part of the religion." In this rhetoric there is no room for a state of Israel—as there is none for a state of Palestine in Sharon's "Greater Israel."

Israel's Hamas relations intensified after the Arab League, in 1974, decided to recognize Arafat and the PLO as the representatives of the Palestinian people—in effect, a government in exile. By 1979, top Yassin acquired an official permit from the Israeli government of Prime Minister Menachem Begin. This coincided with the signing of the Camp David peace treaty between Israel and Egypt. That treaty embodied detailed clauses calling for the establishment of a Palestinian Authority in the Occupied Territories, which would be the precursor for the Israeli withdrawal and the establishment of a Palestinian state. Gen. Ariel Sharon has been the chief proponent since this treaty was signed, of the policy of ensuring that these clauses would never be implemented. His chosen alternatives were war in Lebanon and the expansion of the Jewish settlements in the Occupied Territories. Sharon was helped by the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat by Anglo-American-controlled, Egypt-based Islamic terrorists.
`Policy of Strengthening Islamic Bodies'

Israeli toleration, if not initial sponsorship of the Islamic movement, has been acknowledged and well documented in Israeli sources. In 1997, the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, at Tel Aviv University, published a study, "Hamas: Radical Islam In A National Struggle," authored by Anat Kurz and Nahman Tal. It stated that the Islamic Association, "the platform of which contained no nationalist clauses, obtained a permit from the Israeli Civil Administration in 1979 to conduct its activities. The permit was apparently consistent with the Israeli policy of strengthening Islamic bodies as a counterweight to Palestinian nationalist groups."

The rapid expansion of the Islamic Association led to clashes on the Palestinian University campuses in the Occupied Territories in the 1980s, betwen PLO-affiliated students and those associated with the Islamists. This expansion was aided by the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, where Sharon hoped to solve the "Palestinian problem" by militarily crushing the PLO—which was then based in Lebanon—and by carrying out genocide against the hundreds of thousands of Palestinians living in impoverished refugee camps in Lebanon. Despite his orchestration of the massacre of thousands of Palestinians, including women and children, at the Sabra and Chatila refugee camps, Sharon failed to eliminate Arafat. Nonetheless, Arafat and the PLO were exiled to Tunisia, their influence severely weakened.

Sheikh Yassin, along with other Hamas leaders, was arrested in 1984, after it was discovered that the Islamic Association had maintained arms caches. But the organization was not banned. In fact, Yassin was soon released as part of an unprecedented prisoner exchange between Israel and Ahmed Jabril's PFLP-General Command. This deal, made with one of the most violent of all anti-PLO Palestinian groups at the time, was made in a period when the Mossad was busy assassinating the most moderate of PLO leaders.

Then, in 1988, the Islamic Association created Hamas as a direct alternative to the PLO, which had launched the first Intifada the year before. 1988 was also important because the PLO, at the 19th Conference of the Palestinian National Council in Algeria in 1988, accepted the United Nations Security Council resolution of 1947 calling for two states in Palestine. They also called for convening an international peace conference based on UN Resolutions 242 and 338, which established the land-for-peace concept. This was a de facto recognition of Israel by the PLO and Arafat. By the end of 1988, the Reagan Administration extended official recognition to the PLO as the official representative of the Palestinian people.

When Palestinian leader Abu Jihad began negotiating with Hamas, in an attempt to win its mass base over to the new policy, he was promptly assassinated by the Mossad.

Yassin, as all senior leaders of Hamas, is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, the far-flung international Islamic organization with operations throughout the Islamic world. In the past, Anglo-American factions have not hesitated to manipulate the Brotherhood's various factions to destabilize secular Arab regimes. When Zbigniew Brzezinski launched the Afghan war against Russia in the 1980s, many of the Arab mujahideen fighters were recruited through Muslim Brotherhood-linked networks. The Muslim Brotherhood story fills volumes; the crucial point here is that Hamas, one of its branches, has traditionally stood in opposition to the secular nationalism of Arafat, the PLO, and its supporting governments.

Hamas has a peculiar organizational structure which contrasts sharply with that of the PLO. While within the West Bank and Gaza, Hamas exists as a broad political movement, its militant wings, the Izza-Din Al Qassam and Islamic Jihad, split-offs from the organization, are administered totally separately. These latter organizations, which are responsible for the attacks, are under the control of leaders who operate from abroad. Their offices are in London, where the group's magazine, Falatin Al Muslimah, is based; Jordan; Syria; and the United States, particularly in Virginia and Texas. Although Arafat has periodically tried to bring the popular base of Hamas into the Palestinian fold, the foreign-based military leadership has always opposed him.

This bifurcation dovetails with Sharon's strategy of launching brutal attacks against Hamas targets, in order to elicit the equally brutal response from Islamic Jihad and the Izza-Din Al Qassam. Thus Arafat, and diplomatic goals, are undermined, and the fires of civil war within the Occupied Territories are stoked.
The Anti-Oslo Terror Campaign Begins

The Oslo Accords marked the first glimmer of hope for a resolution of the Middle East conflict. And, the first suicide terrorist attack aimed at destroying it was not launched by Hamas or Islamic Jihad or another Palestinian faction. The first suicide attack was launched on Feb. 25, 1994, by Israeli terrorist Baruch Goldstein, when he entered the Mosque of Hebron and killed 50 Muslim worshippers as well as himself. Goldstein was a member of Kach, the terrorist organization founded by the late Meir Kahane, who also founded the Jewish Defense League in the 1960s in the United States. Kach, which is well connected to Sharon, is on the official U.S. State Department list of terrorist organizations.

The unprecedented massacre was calculated to set the stage for a suicide bombing campaign by Hamas and its split-off, Islamic Jihad, over the next year. In fact, it set into motion the "cycle of violence" that has yet to end. The Goldstein attack came at precisely the point when Israeli Prime Minister Rabin and Arafat began the formal implementation of the Oslo agreement which envisioned the establishment of a Palestinian state by 1998. The first Hamas-linked suicide attacks did not start until two months later, in April 1994, when Rabin and Arafat signed the agreement for the establishment of the Palestinian National Authority. The agreement called for the conduct of free elections throughout the territories—which would eventually establish the international legitimacy of the Arafat-led government.

But despite this terror campaign, which lasted for months under a massive crackdown by Arafat's security forces, the Rabin-Arafat alliance, although seriously weakened, was not broken. This alliance was finally broken with Rabin's assassination by an Israeli, on Nov. 5, 1995.

The next phase of attacks followed the "targetted assassination" of Hamas bomb-maker Yahya Ayyash on Jan. 5, 1996. Although said to be "revenge attacks," they were in fact part of Hamas' campaign to get Benjamin Netanyahu elected Israeli prime minister. This was admitted by Ibraham Ghawshah, Hamas' official spokesman resident in Amman, Jordan. He said that it was part of their strategy to influence Israeli public opinon to bring down the entire Oslo process. The election of Netanyahu indeed fulfilled all their hopes, especially after he launched his own provocations, which not only brought about the pre-calculated Hamas response, but also brought the region several times to the brink of war.

This tit-for-tat campaign reached the height of insanity when Netanyahu, under the direction of Sharon, who was a member of his government at the time, launched a Mossad assassination attempt in 1997 against the Jordan-based Hamas official Khalid Mishaal. Not only did the attempt fail, but it led to Israel agreeing to release Hamas spiritual leader Sheikh Yassin from an Israeli jail, where he had been under arrest since 1989. Yassin was allowed to return to Gaza to rally Hamas against the Oslo process in general, and Arafat in particular.

This pattern has continued to this very day. Netanyahu's downfall in 1999 led to the short-lived government of Ehud Barak, who despite much talking and negotiating, furthered the Oslo process not one iota. By the end of the Summer of 2000, the stage was set for Sharon's ultimate provocation, his Sept. 28 march on to the Islamic holy site Al-Haram Al-Sharif/Temple Mount.

Since coming to power, Sharon has done everything to ensure the collapse of Arafat and the Palestinian Authority. If successful, it would either bring Hamas to power or lead to political chaos within the terrorities.

[Giovane]

Io non voglio, volutamente, parlare di inesistenza dell'Olocausto, anche se sono convinto che la storia della shoah sia stracolma di menzogne....comunque credo che gli ebrei stiano diventando un serio pericolo per i popoli europei, ormai si stanno insediando in tutte le nazioni, in tutte le istituzioni, bombardano, uccidono, e poi ti danno dell'antisemita e tirano fuori la shoah come per dire che loro possono tutto perche' hanno alle spalle quella presunta tragedia...!

saluti fascisti!

Secondo me c'e solo una possibilità che si fermi il potere sionista, ed è attraverso il consenso o la presa di posizione , non che di informazione del popolo, per ribaltare o fermare i giudei ocorre far aprire gli occhi sulle bugie che raccontano alla gente, consideriamo anche che i comportamenti di Sharon, sè da un lato sono spregievoli, dall'altro fanno il nostro gioco, poi ci vuole una massiccia propaganda sulle verità olocaustiche, sè la gente capira il loro giro verrà fermato, è anche certi politici amici degli ebrei, nel mondo più semplice il voto e la lotta.









MIT UNS