User Tag List

Risultati da 1 a 6 di 6
  1. #1
    Moderatore Libertarissimo
    Data Registrazione
    06 Mar 2002
    Località
    Covo dei "Sovversivi"
    Messaggi
    1,141
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito I bianchi hanno diritti?

    Pensando ai fatti di Treviso penso sia utile postare questo interessante articolo:

    Do Whites Have Rights?
    By Paul Craig Roberts

    Does anyone remember what the civil rights movement was about?

    Not today. Four decades later, it is “controversial” if not “racist” to recall that the civil rights movement was about equal opportunity.

    People were to be hired on the basis of merit and ability alone--”the best person for the job”. No other factor was to play a role.

    The ink was hardly dry on the 1964 Civil Rights Act before an EEOC bureaucrat, Alfred W. Blumrosen, illegally and unconstitutionally subverted the statutory purpose of the law. Judicial complicity and congressional distraction enabled Blumrosen to redefine discrimination from a purposeful action against an individual to the absence of proportional representation regardless of discriminatory intent.

    Thus did Blumrosen originate the system of race and gender privileges known as quotas that are thoroughly institutionalized throughout the government, private industry, and universities.

    Racial quotas are so firmly entrenched that quotas prevail even in states where federal district courts have ruled against them and referendums have made them illegal.

    The 1964 Civil Rights Act has been illegally enforced for 37 years. The result is a massive system of race and gender discrimination against white males in order to achieve proportional representation of racial minorities and women.

    Now comes an astonishing report from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management: “Annual Report to Congress, Federal Equal Opportunity Recruitment Program, Fiscal Year 2000,” released in April 2002. [You can read it on Adversity.net, an anti-preference organization that fights for victims of reverse discrimination, with analysis and comment.]

    This report to Congress makes brutally clear that despite the “equal opportunity” name of the program, the purpose of the federal program is to make certain there is no equal opportunity for whites in federal employment.

    The report uses tables and bar charts to make unmistakably clear that federal discrimination against whites goes far beyond merely achieving proportional representation for blacks. In all 22 independent federal agencies and in 16 of 17 federal executive departments, blacks are massively overrepresented.

    In the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (sic) blacks comprise 46.4 percent of the employees. The “affirmative action” or racial quota target for proportional representation (percent in Relevant Civilian Labor Force) for the EEOC is 6.4 percent black employees.

    Blacks are thus overrepresented in EEOC employment by 625 percent!

    And the EEOC is the federal agency that is supposed to enforce equal employment opportunity.

    Blacks are overrepresented in the National Science Foundation by 504.7 %; in the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. by 538.7 %; in the Securities and Exchange Commission by 452.1%; in the Smithsonian Institution by 452.1%, in the Federal Communications Commission by 370.1%; in the Social Security Administration by 263.5%; in the Commodity Futures Trading Commission by 375%; in the Office of Personnel Management by 286.7%; and so on.

    In cabinet departments, blacks are overrepresented in Department of Education employment by 464.7%; in Department of Labor by 254%; in HUD by 383%; in Treasury by 176%; in Department of Justice by 106%; in Department of State by 165%; and so on.

    The push is now on in the federal government to achieve comparable overrepresentation for Hispanics and females.

    If these two “minorities” achieve similar overrepresentation, there will be no room for white males in the federal government.

    Did you know that the federal government pays its managers “superbonuses” for hiring, training, and promoting nonwhites? According to a lawsuit filed against the Secretary of Energy by DOE employees, a DOE boss, Anibal Taboas, staffed the Argonne National Laboratory with minorities, while reassigning white males to dead end jobs where they could be terminated under reduction in force polices.

    For this achievement, the lawsuit says Mr. Taboas received thousands of dollars in bonuses.

    Note that no one in the government intervenes in behalf of white males who suffer discrimination, not President Bush, no congressional committee chairman, certainly not the Justice Department or the EEOC.

    Today in the United States white people have no political representation. Whites have to struggle in the courts against government opposition to claim any resemblance to equal rights.

    Explicit government policies have made whites second class citizens. Whites are a dispossessed majority in their own country.

    Why did the white majority allow themselves to be stripped of the equal protection clause of the Constitution? Why do whites remain loyal to the political parties that took away their rights?

    What is the future for whites in a political system where both political parties pander to third world immigrants and support racial privileges for minorities? Having lost equal protection of law, what will whites lose next?

    Paul Craig Roberts is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of The New Color Line : How Quotas and Privilege Destroy Democracy.

    COPYRIGHT CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

    August 06, 2002

    D vdare.com

    •   Alt 

      TP Advertising

      advertising

       

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Data Registrazione
    24 Jun 2002
    Messaggi
    337
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito Ancora peggio: i multiculturalisti ci vogliono tutti morti

    Harvard Hates The White Race?

    By Paul Craig Roberts

    Is the multicultural campaign really about diversity? Or is it about stamping out Western civilization and the “white race” itself?

    College students will tell you that a university education today is a guilt trip for whites. The purpose is to prevent whites from appreciating and absorbing their own culture and to make it difficult for whites to resist the unreasonable demands (quotas, reparations, etc.) from “people of color.”

    To the questions, “who am I, what am I,” the white university graduate answers: “a racist, sexist, homophobic oppressor.”

    Neither parents, trustees, alumni, nor the public are aware of the anti-white propaganda that masquerades as education. When someone who is aware tells them, they think the person is exaggerating in order to make a point.

    Now comes Harvard educated Noel Ignatiev, an academic at Harvard’s W.E.B. DuBois Institute for African-American Research. Dr. Ignatiev is the founder of a journal, Race Traitor, which has as its motto, “treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.”

    The journal’s purpose is “to abolish the white race.”

    At the least, Dr. Ignatiev intends cultural and psychological genocide for whites. It is unclear whether physical extermination is part of the program. A statement by the editors on the web site says that the new abolitionists

    “do not limit themselves to socially acceptable means of protest, but reject in advance no means of attaining their goal.”

    Dr. Ignatiev does not believe his agenda is controversial. He writes:

    “The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.” Thus does he put whites on notice. If they oppose their abolition, they are “white supremacists.”

    According to Dr. Ignatiev,

    “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race.”

    “Make no mistake about it,” he says,

    “we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed--not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.”

    What “social construct” will be left? A black one? An Hispanic one? Muslim? Asian? What about Jewish?

    The Washington Times reports that Dr. Ignatiev is himself Jewish. If Jewish intellectuals and Israeli political leaders can be believed, Jews have a cultural and racial consciousness. Israel is the Jewish homeland, and Israelis seem determined to keep it that way. Can anyone imagine a gentile at an Israeli university founding a magazine devoted to abolishing the Jewish race?

    Yet, Dr. Ignatiev believes that it is self-evident that whites in their homelands should be abolished.

    Where did he get this view? His only education was at Harvard where he received two graduate degrees.

    Is Harvard embarrassed? No. Dr. Ignatiev [ignatiev@fas.harvard.edu] is showcased in the current issue of Harvard Magazine. Getting rid of whiteness is not controversial at Harvard, because it is the business of American universities.

    A white skin, you see, is a mark of privilege. It is not the privilege of being admitted to Harvard even though you don’t meet the entrance requirements. It is not the privilege of being hired independently of ability because of government enforced racial quotas. It is not the privilege of being able to sue whites and “white companies” if blacks are not proportionately represented in the work force. It is not the privilege of being able to call whites every name in the book and sue if a white replies in kind.

    The privilege of being white is that whites can secretly believe they are superior and, as long as they don’t mention it, be loyal to the white race.

    “The white race is like a private club,” says Dr. Ignatiev.

    I am sure Dr. Ignatiev is well-informed, but I see no signs of this white loyalty. Most of the multiculturalists and radical feminists are white. Whites disadvantaged whites by imposing racial quotas. Despite widespread opposition to quotas, neither “white” political party will act to stop unconstitutional quotas, which have made a mockery of equality under law. Whites are inundated by massive non-white immigration, and neither “white” political party will act to restrain immigration. To the contrary, both parties pander to the immigrants.

    But Dr. Ignatiev has an idea like Hitler. A race is guilty and must go. The communists said it was a guilty class that had to go.

    If you thought genocide was left behind in the 20th century, be apprised that today genocide has a home in the educational system.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Data Registrazione
    24 Jun 2002
    Messaggi
    337
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito Ancora peggio: i multiculturalisti ci vogliono tutti morti

    Harvard Hates The White Race?

    By Paul Craig Roberts

    Is the multicultural campaign really about diversity? Or is it about stamping out Western civilization and the “white race” itself?

    College students will tell you that a university education today is a guilt trip for whites. The purpose is to prevent whites from appreciating and absorbing their own culture and to make it difficult for whites to resist the unreasonable demands (quotas, reparations, etc.) from “people of color.”

    To the questions, “who am I, what am I,” the white university graduate answers: “a racist, sexist, homophobic oppressor.”

    Neither parents, trustees, alumni, nor the public are aware of the anti-white propaganda that masquerades as education. When someone who is aware tells them, they think the person is exaggerating in order to make a point.

    Now comes Harvard educated Noel Ignatiev, an academic at Harvard’s W.E.B. DuBois Institute for African-American Research. Dr. Ignatiev is the founder of a journal, Race Traitor, which has as its motto, “treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.”

    The journal’s purpose is “to abolish the white race.”

    At the least, Dr. Ignatiev intends cultural and psychological genocide for whites. It is unclear whether physical extermination is part of the program. A statement by the editors on the web site says that the new abolitionists

    “do not limit themselves to socially acceptable means of protest, but reject in advance no means of attaining their goal.”

    Dr. Ignatiev does not believe his agenda is controversial. He writes:

    “The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.” Thus does he put whites on notice. If they oppose their abolition, they are “white supremacists.”

    According to Dr. Ignatiev,

    “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race.”

    “Make no mistake about it,” he says,

    “we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed--not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.”

    What “social construct” will be left? A black one? An Hispanic one? Muslim? Asian? What about Jewish?

    The Washington Times reports that Dr. Ignatiev is himself Jewish. If Jewish intellectuals and Israeli political leaders can be believed, Jews have a cultural and racial consciousness. Israel is the Jewish homeland, and Israelis seem determined to keep it that way. Can anyone imagine a gentile at an Israeli university founding a magazine devoted to abolishing the Jewish race?

    Yet, Dr. Ignatiev believes that it is self-evident that whites in their homelands should be abolished.

    Where did he get this view? His only education was at Harvard where he received two graduate degrees.

    Is Harvard embarrassed? No. Dr. Ignatiev [ignatiev@fas.harvard.edu] is showcased in the current issue of Harvard Magazine. Getting rid of whiteness is not controversial at Harvard, because it is the business of American universities.

    A white skin, you see, is a mark of privilege. It is not the privilege of being admitted to Harvard even though you don’t meet the entrance requirements. It is not the privilege of being hired independently of ability because of government enforced racial quotas. It is not the privilege of being able to sue whites and “white companies” if blacks are not proportionately represented in the work force. It is not the privilege of being able to call whites every name in the book and sue if a white replies in kind.

    The privilege of being white is that whites can secretly believe they are superior and, as long as they don’t mention it, be loyal to the white race.

    “The white race is like a private club,” says Dr. Ignatiev.

    I am sure Dr. Ignatiev is well-informed, but I see no signs of this white loyalty. Most of the multiculturalists and radical feminists are white. Whites disadvantaged whites by imposing racial quotas. Despite widespread opposition to quotas, neither “white” political party will act to stop unconstitutional quotas, which have made a mockery of equality under law. Whites are inundated by massive non-white immigration, and neither “white” political party will act to restrain immigration. To the contrary, both parties pander to the immigrants.

    But Dr. Ignatiev has an idea like Hitler. A race is guilty and must go. The communists said it was a guilty class that had to go.

    If you thought genocide was left behind in the 20th century, be apprised that today genocide has a home in the educational system.

  4. #4
    Moderatore Libertarissimo
    Data Registrazione
    06 Mar 2002
    Località
    Covo dei "Sovversivi"
    Messaggi
    1,141
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito

    Incredibile......onestamente non credevo che la cosa fosse già manifesta in tutta la sua gravità..

    Sa£udi serenissimi da Pippo III.

  5. #5
    Moderatore Libertarissimo
    Data Registrazione
    06 Mar 2002
    Località
    Covo dei "Sovversivi"
    Messaggi
    1,141
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito

    Incredibile......onestamente non credevo che la cosa fosse già manifesta in tutta la sua gravità..

    Sa£udi serenissimi da Pippo III.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Data Registrazione
    24 Jun 2002
    Messaggi
    337
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito Intanto Mugabe mette in pratica la teoria...

    Paul Craig Roberts

    September 9, 2002

    Mugabe's final solution

    Dr. Noel Ignatiev, Harvard academic and founder of the racist magazine, Race Traitor, wants "to abolish the white race." Ignatiev wants to abolish whites, because he believes whites are loyal to their race and advance their interests at the expense of black people.

    Apparently, he sees no harm in other races being loyal to their race and even having organized lobby groups, such as the NAACP, to advance their race interests. Ignatiev is also at peace with non-white races using the EEOC, the U.S. Department of Justice (sic) and U.S. Department of Education to advance their racial interests.

    In Ignatiev's view, nonwhite races are entitled to organize and to use government power to advance their racial interests, but whites are a social problem. "The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race," says Ignatiev.

    It is not surprising that Ignatiev has been influenced by education that demonizes Western civilization and white people. Neither is it surprising that education led him to the conclusion that the solution is to phase white people out of the human race. Still, if whites are to be terminated because of race loyalty, shouldn't there first be some evidence presented that whites are loyal to one another?

    Currently, President Mugabe is terminating whites in Zimbabwe. He is illegally seizing their farms and encouraging his thugs to use beatings, murder and rape to terrorize whites into acquiescence.

    Mugabe's land theft doesn't even have the cover of redistribution. All news reports say the farms are being taken by Mugabe, his family members and top cronies. Annabel Hughes of the Zimbabwe Democracy Trust reports that Simbi Mubako, Zimbabwean ambassador to Washington, has been presented with Adrian Wilkinson's 2,964-acre farm.

    If whites had race loyalty or even racial awareness, wouldn't they do something about Mugabe's decimation of their brothers and sisters? One British regiment or one U.S. Marine division could topple Mugabe in a few hours. However, instead of displaying race loyalty, white governments are enabling Mugabe by sending him food.

    Mugabe's land seizures have thrown Zimbabwean agriculture into chaos. The country faces starvation. Mugabe controls the food aid, and the food will go to his supporters.

    There is widespread black opposition to Mugabe, who had to steal the last election. Mugabe created a food crisis not merely in order to drive whites out of Zimbabwe, but in order to decimate the black opposition led by Morgan Tsvangirai.

    Mugabe's policy is "selective starvation, the use of food as a political weapon," says John Prendergast of the International Crisis Group.

    Perhaps we begin to see a problem with Ignatiev's concept of race loyalty. Mugabe is no more loyal to Zimbabwe's blacks than Europeans and Americans are to Zimbabwean and South African whites.

    American "whites" are descendants of Anglo-Saxons, French, Dutch, Italians and Germans who have lengthy histories of warfare among one another. American "blacks" are descendants of different warring tribes. The slaves brought to America were captured in tribal warfare. Black tribal chiefs sold their fellow blacks to Arabs and Europeans.

    The real question is: Who hates the "white race" most? The answer is: alienated white intellectuals.

    The multicultural diversity-mongers in college and university faculties are disproportionately white. They have been trying for decades to make blacks hate whites as much as they do. These intellectuals have had some success. They have cultivated black anger by making accusations against whites, and they have planted guilt and doubt in many of the younger generation of white Americans.

    A make-believe history is slowly taking over the American mind, just like Marx's make-believe history took over Russia and Hitler's make-believe history took over Germany. The cultivation of race hatred in blacks and race guilt in whites is an ongoing enterprise in American education. Before it is over, there will be more Ignatievs.

 

 

Discussioni Simili

  1. Gli indiani d'America hanno detto basta ai bianchi!
    Di joseph nel forum POL International
    Risposte: 0
    Ultimo Messaggio: 13-02-10, 20:11
  2. Auto blu con il lampeggiante: che diritti hanno??
    Di Airbus nel forum Politica Nazionale
    Risposte: 32
    Ultimo Messaggio: 13-07-09, 10:39
  3. Siamo tutti uguali ma i diritti li hanno solo loro.
    Di gladiator82ct nel forum Politica Nazionale
    Risposte: 7
    Ultimo Messaggio: 10-03-07, 20:51
  4. i barboni italiani hanno meno diritti dei clandestini
    Di raiky nel forum Destra Radicale
    Risposte: 4
    Ultimo Messaggio: 14-12-06, 23:29
  5. i barboni italiani hanno meno diritti dei clandestini
    Di raiky nel forum Centrodestra Italiano
    Risposte: 0
    Ultimo Messaggio: 14-12-06, 21:57

Permessi di Scrittura

  • Tu non puoi inviare nuove discussioni
  • Tu non puoi inviare risposte
  • Tu non puoi inviare allegati
  • Tu non puoi modificare i tuoi messaggi
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226