Left and Right: Prospects for a Revolutionary Alliance

[ennerre]

Left and Right: Prospects for a Revolutionary Alliance

While many contemporary American revolutionaries consistently bemoan the apparent apathy displayed by much of the American public, evidence exists that the winds are in fact beginning to blow in our direction.Polls taken in recent years indicate that nearly forty percent of Americans believe government to be a serious and immediate threat to the liberty and security of the people. Indeed, many of these polls show that approximately three percent of Americans now feel that armed struggle against the state would be justified. That may not sound like a lot when viewed on its own but a look at the historical evidence provides some interesting insights. When the American colonists declared independence in 1776 ( the actual war of revolution had begun a year earlier) only five percent of the two and a half million colonists actually favored secession from the British Empire. By the time independence had been won seven years later, nearly a third of the people had come to favor independence with another third remaining loyal to the crown and yet another third being neutral. Only sixty thousand persons, about two and a half percent of the population of the colonies, actually participated in the revolutionary effort itself. The situation of the colonial revolutionaries was not unlike that facing Americans of today. The British Empire was the dominant world power and was regarded as the most advanced, prosperous and enlightened state of its time. It was one of the first nations to informally implement religious toleration and was a leading nation in the crusade against slavery. The typical British citizen enjoyed greater personal liberty than residents of other nations of the time and British political and legal culture had begun to absorb some of the liberal ideas that had emerged from the Enlightenment. Indeed, England had comparatively strong libertarian traditions reaching as far back as the Magna Carta and Anglo-Saxon common law. Today, the United States is the dominant world power, possesses the strongest military force in history and is also the most technologically advanced nation and one of the wealthiest. The United States also has, for the time being, relatively high levels of individual freedom and probably possesses the strongest libertarian traditions of any contemporary nation. Like ancient Rome in its latter days, the United States is a great but decaying and dying civilization in the process of being eaten away by the cancer of internal corruption. The similarities between the incompetent leaders of latter day Rome-Caligula, Nero and others-and many current American leaders ( Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Rudolph Guiliani, Edward Kennedy) are all too obvious. The United States is rapidly degenerating into a tyrannical police state. Twenty five percent of the world's prisoners are located in American penal institutions and the American states's "War on Drugs" has begun to mirror the early day of the Nazi pogrom against the Jews. A massive prison-industrial complex, a pernicious program of civilian disarmament, widespread police terrorism, the gradual establishment of paramilitary police forces as an occupational army, growing use of the regular armed forces in domestic "law enforcement" and other related measures are planting the seeds for a full blown American fascism. Meanwhile, the process of globalization promises to create an even narrower concentration of absolute power into the hands of political, economic, media and military elites. Resistance has emerged from a variety of sources in recent years. The anti-globalization movement staged the largest confrontation with elite power in three decades during the Battle of Seattle in November 1999. The massacre of the Branch Davidian religious community in April 1993 has become the contemporary equivalent of the Boston Massacre that was so pivotal in the events leading up to the American War of Independence. The 1992 uprising on the West Coast was the largest since the Civil War era. The recent Texas prison break demonstrated that the prison-industrial complex is not quite so invincible as it might appear. An avowed separatist was elected governor of Alaska and an elected New Hampshire state representative openly endorsed armed struggle against agents of the state. The remainder of this essay will outline a comprehesive strategy for resistance to the current American state towards the ultimate goal of carrying out a second American revolution for the purpose of liberating the peoples' of North America from both the increasingly tyrannical domestic regime and the emerging global regime ruled by megaconglomerates and commonly referred to in some dissident circles as the New World Order. Three basic points are argued:

1) Emerging resistance elements represent a wide variety of trends originating from entirely different sources and with widely divergent motivations but with nearly identical enemies.

2) Effective resistance to the common enemies can only take place if a united front is maintained by resistance elements in spite of serious cultural and ideological differences and increased efforts by elites at cooptation, disruption and repression.

3) A common program involving large-scale organization towards common ends with the use of radical decentralization as means of working around major internal differences and resisting external repression is absolutely vital to the ultimate success of the resistance effort.

The first of these points are to some degree the product of the heterogenous nature of American culture. Whether one is speaking of ethnic minorites brutalized and terrorized by urban police thugs and herded into the prison-industrial complex, rebellious middle-class youth drawn to resistance activity as a result of both natural youthful idealism and restlessness and the expanding attacks on youth by the state, rural and small town militiamen feeling encroached upon by federal tyranny and globalization generated dislocations or simply persons from all walks of life fed up with business as usual, the voices raised universally condemn the same primary targets-centralized political and economic power, media and academic institutions that serve as mouthpieces for elite propaganda and the creeping fascism finding its way into every area of life. Thus far, resistance has been brewing in a number of camps yet no determined effort has been made to sew the various threads of discontent into a quilt of a unified resistance alliance organized around a comprehensive revolutionary program. It appears that resistance is emerging from four basic population groups. These include both working and privileged class youth, traditional working people from the sparsely populated areas of the United States, the urban poor and minorites and, lastly, conventional "outlaw" elements or, as the Marxists like to say, the "lumpenproletariat" consisting of gang members, ex-convicts, prison inmates, various drug cultures, the homeless and other street populations and the like. How would a new political paradigm aiming at the organization of these diverse elements into a resistance front be constructed? First, it must be recognized that each of these constituencies, regardless of their various differences, have essentially the same enemies-government, police, socio-economic and corporate elites and the forces of globalization. Second, a program must be developed whereby these differences can be separated from one another in order to strengthen the common effort. The primary differences are cultural. Rural and small town farmers and workers attracted to the militia movement are primarily white, Christian, socially conservative and culturally homo- genous. The urban poor are primarily ethnic minorites with a wide variety of religious orientations including a growing Islamic presence and frequently exhibiting a matriarchal, extended family structure naturally resulting from the incarceration of so many urban poor males as part of the state's program of repression. Youth attracted to revolutionary politics seem to be primarily, though not exclusively, white and from more privileged sectors than their rural or inner-city counterparts. Lastly, the so-called "lumpen" elements frequently originate from the lowest rungs on the socio-economic ladder and are viewed with suspicion and mistrust even by other disenfranchised sectors. It is essential that a serious revolutionary movement adopt a profoundly decentralized structure in order to accommodate the diverse elements within its own ranks. This can be done if each element fights on its own "turf" in a separate but mutually supportive way towards the aim of realizing a few common goals-eradication of central power, elimination of the domestic police state and withdrawal from the globalization process. Geographical separation becomes the key to making this process work. A comprehensive revolutionary program must have a political, economic, social, cultural and military dimension. A parallel infrastucture, reminiscient of the old Wobbly concept of "building the new system within the shell of the old", must be established. Institutions developed by the militia/patriot movement in recent years may provide some guidance here. The initial motivating factors for the creation of the militia movement were the federal killings at Waco, Texas and Ruby Ridge, Idaho, the threat of repressive federal "gun control", or civilian disarmament ( taken as a personal threat by the gun-oriented rural culture), the dislocation of millions of farm families in America's heartland region at the hands of government and agribusiness, land seizures and other forms of repression and growing fears about the totalitar- ian nature of the globalization process. In the process, the militia/patriot movement has created a subculture organized around a wide number of alternative institutions and activities. These institutions are worth taking a look at because they provide a splendid example of a working class resistance effort created by working class persons solely on their own initiative. Included in these institutions are military, legal, political, educational, media and economic activities. The militia is the military arm of the movement. These groups are highly decentralized with no central command structure at all. Some militias are open and public and march and train in public view sometimes even in the presence of television cameras. Others are secretive and are generally organized into small, tight-knit three-to-five man cells. The most common difficulty faced by these groups has been the avoidance of infiltration by informants and government agents and the succumbing of careless persons to government entrapment schemes resulting in "illegal weapons" prosecutions. The legal arm of the movement is organized around the so-called "common law courts". These are essentially an effort to create a parallel legal infrastructure in opposition to the state's legal system. The nature of these courts is highly diverse. Influences include such divergent sources as the U.S. Constitution, state constitutions, the Magna Carta, the Uniform commercial code, old English common law, the Bible and others. The "laws" of these courts are typically quite libertarian, usually rejecting all laws except those prohibiting aggression against other people and their property, although some fringe elements within the movement throw in aspects of Christian fundamentalism or white supremacy as well. Some patriot elements have also organized an alternative political system usually centered around the idea of a "sovereign township", that is a decentralized community independent of conventional federal or state authorites. Hard-core participants typically refuse to obtain driver's licenses or social security cards or display motor vehicle tags. Refusing to send their children to state-run schools, home schooling is very big among these people as well. Patriots have also developed a fairly large alternative media culture consisting of short wave and pirate radio programs, web sites and other forms of internet communication, "underground" magazines and newsletters and public access television. In addition, an economic aspect of the movement exists consisting primarily of self-sufficient rural and mountainous "survival" compounds, various types of appropriate technology and do-it-yourself medical treatments and energy sources and even alternative forms of monetary currency. It would be highly beneficient for a similar effort at the creation of an alternative infrastructure to begin among other population groups as well. An urban revolutionary movement needs to develop as a complement to already established rural alternative institutions. An urban militia system might form inspired partially by the patriot militias and by previous urban armed struggle efforts such as the Black Panther Party, the Black Liberation Army, the Young Lords, the Brown Berets, the Young Patriots, the Chinese Red Guards,etc. Groups of this type might operate paramilitary training camps in secret locations in the outlying areas around cities while maintaining a decentralized cellular model of self-organization. In addition, alternative "courts" might be set up in urban communities for the arbitration of disputes without involvement from the state's legal system. A parallel political infrastructure, based on the idea of a federation of sovereign neighborhoods, might be established along with alternative, non-governmental schools, assistance programs for the needy, alternative media, cooperative enterprises, businesses owned and operated by radical and community organizations, tenants unions, claimants' unions for recipients of public assistance, consumer information services, free clinics, neighborhood patrols, guilds for the defense of the homeless, addicts, runaways, prostitutes and other populations with special needs, urban gardens, squats and the like. Radical youth clubs should be established on high school and university campuses and in suburban and upper class communities as well as working class and poor ones. These clubs would engaged in ordinary cultural and recreational activities centered around youth fashion, music, art, etc. but would provide sound political education and firearms and civilian defense training as well. The gang structure built up in many urban communities provides a number of special challenges. There are approximately thirty-one thousand gangs active in the United States today with a combined membership of nearly one million. These people are armed, angry and have the correct enemies. Successful attempts to politicize urban gangs have occurred in the past. The Young Patriots and Young Lords were originally street gangs and the Black Panther Party recruited heavily from the urban gang culture as has the Chicago-based New Black Panther Party. A number of major gangs have become politicized in recent year including Los Angeles' Bloods and Crips, with a truce implemented between these two previously warring gangs, and Chicago's Gangster Disciples whose political arm, Twenty-First Century Vote, has become active in city politics. Prison gangs that could be mobilized in direct opposition to the prison- industrial complex would be a tremendous asset to the struggle. During his stay in California's Folsom Prison in the 1970s, Dr. Timothy Leary formed an alliance of the Mexican Mafia, Black Muslims, Hell's Angels, Aryan Brotherhood and other California prison gangs around the issues of prisoners' rights and prison conditions. Ultimately, the goal would be to create a nationwide federation of popular organizations representing a huge variation of interests and activities. At local levels, each city or county would form an alliance of local radical, community and defense organizations, perhaps coordinated by a council consisting of one delegate each from every participating neighborhood association, economic enterprise, union, cooperative, activist group, church, street gang, militia, anarchist group, separatist group, etc. Each council would then send a delegate to a regional and then national federation of similar type. The purpose of the national federation would be mutual defense and support. Each local alliance would be expected to gain political control of its own "turf". This could be done by economic methods (strikes, boycotts,etc.), political methods (running for and obtaining positions on city councils, state assemblies, school boards, zoning commissions) or direct military action (armed insurrection). Once the revolutionary forces became dominant in enough areas, the next step would be to declare an independent confederat- ion of sovereign regions, townships, villages, city-states, communities, tribes, republics, kingdoms, etc. combined with total renunciation of the state-corporate political system, the dismantling of state political, legal and judicial systems locally and regionally, the freeing of prisoners, occupation of industrial facilities, seizure of military bases and so on. Of course, central power would never step down without a fight so armed conflict would inevitably result. On one side would be civilian militia organizations, paramilitary forces and guerilla armies organized, variously,on a geographical, cultural, ethnic, religious, ideological, economic, biker, gangster,etc. basis. On the other hand would be the forces of the state-primarily regular military connected to Pentagon interests, federal paramilitary forces and metropolitan police. Probably at least some National Guard, regular army and rural sheriff's departments would defect to the revolutionary side. The state's armed forces are not as invincible as they may seem. During the West Coast uprising of 1992, the Los Angeles Police force (one of the best trained in the world) turned and ran. During the Columbine massacre, SWAT teams facing only two teenagers armed with semi-automatic rifles hid behind ambulances. Even the Branch Davidians did quite well in the initial gun fight with the BATF. It wasn't until reinforcements (including regular army with tanks) were called in that they were crushed. A similar massacre of the Montana Freemen in 1997 was prevented by the threat of militia groups offering to come to their aid. Many different efforts such as these occurring simultaneously and in support of one another would be very difficult for the state to suppress. This would be particularly true if the resistance forces were receiving substantial amounts of economic, political, diplomatic and military assistance from foreign sources such as Arab and Islamic nations and revolutionary movements, Asian and Latin American drug cartels, revolutionary forces such as the Zapatistas, Shining Path or the Columbian rebels, a wide assortment of anti-U. S. government and anti-globalization elements in both Western and Eastern Europe, perhaps the nations of Russia and China, independent financiers of revolutionary activities of the Osama Bin Laden type, continental African states and many others. The American Revolution was successful partially because of the support the colonists received from France, who declared war on England in their support, Holland, who declared war on England simultaneously, and Spain, who provided indirect economic, political and military support to the colonists' efforts. The modern world has seen a number of examples of small guerilla-militia movements successfully resisting modern industrial states. The Viet Cong won their independence by defeating the most powerful military force in history. The Afghan resistance effectively defended themselves against Soviet occupation for eight years and eventually drove the Soviets out. The Irish Republican Army, the Palestine Liberation Organization,and the African National Congress have waged successful struggles against the nations of Great Britain, Israel and South Africa, all modern industrial states. The Finnish militia system repelled a Soviet attack in the early days of World War Two. The Swiss militia system was so effective that it deterred a potential invasion by Nazi Germany. Dr. Ralph Turner, a professor of military science and defense director for the Republic of Texas independence forces, believes a well-coordinated civilian revolutionary force would be able to fight the federal regime to a standstill. The post-revolutionary North America would be a profoundly decentralized collection of small, independent, political units, perhaps forming a voluntary confederation for the purpose of continental self-defense. Each group would choose its own political and economic system according to local needs, customs and preferences. The state-supported corporations would collapse in favor of smaller enterprises, worker run businesses, cooperatives, collectives, municipalized industries, the self-employed, farmers, family businesses, guilds, kibbutzes, communes, barter networks, intentional communities, etc. Police and prison systems would be eliminated. Dangerous people would be banished to segregated areas. Anti-poor, anti-worker, anti-youth and other forms of repressive legistlation and policy would be scrapped. Media would be decentralized into the hands of community organizations. Education would be a partnership between teachers and students. Many other positive changes could be made. The American Revolution of 1776 effectively eliminated the monarchy, the aristocracy and the established church. The next American Revolution will eliminate state and corporate privilege as well.

http://www.attackthesystem.com/leftandright.html

[ennerre]

American Revolutionary Vanguard Twenty-Five Point Program



1) Recognizing that the United States of America is rapidly degenerating into a totalitarian police state domestically and steadily being brought under the rule of a global corporate state internationally, American Revolutionary Vanguard is established for building a unified resistance front among all groups, organizations and movements opposed to the common enemies.

2) American Revolutionary Vanguard is non-partisan, non-ideological, non-racial and non-denominational. Our allies and supporters may come from any political party, ideological background, ethnic group or religion. We make no distinction on the basis of gender, nationality, sexual identity, physical disabilities, cultural identity, age or class origins.

3) American Revolutionary Vanguard works for the development of media outlets that provide alternatives to the state-corporate dominated media including shortwave radio, internet news services, public access television, independent publishing houses, newsletters, speakers' bureaus and any other opportunities that may arise.

4) American Revolutionary Vanguard seeks to network with and form alliances with all groups and individuals engaged in active resistance including decentralists, non-supremacist separatists, constitutionalists, autonomists, patriots, populists, anti-corporate libertarians, anarchists, sovereigns, common law advocates, regionalists, anti-state conservatives, non-statist nationalists, agorists, mutualists, syndicalists, individualists, guild socialists, council communists, individualist anarchists, collectivist anarchists, national anarchists, municipalists, Georgists, farmer liberationists, agrarians, radical traditionalists, micronationalists, Luddites, radical environmentalists, deep ecologists, non-reactionary third postionists, geonomists, geolibertarians, libertarian socialists, non-racist militias, anarcha-feminists, libertarian feminists, queer activists, anti-globalists and non-statist class struggle advocates of every kind.

5) Recognizing that youth are the future, American Revolutionary Vanguard focuses its primary recruiting efforts towards intelligent, committed and capable young men and women who will naturally develop into the leadership corps of the struggle to come.

6) American Revolutionary Vanguard encourages its supporters to join and seek leadership positions within larger popular organizations including dissident political parties, neighborhood associations and grassroots community organizations, mainstream pressure groups, territorial secessionist movements and public educational institutions.

7) American Revolutionary Vanguard works for the creation of an economic base for the common struggle and therefore encourages revolutionary individuals and organizations to develop enterprises oriented towards sustainable economic autonomy and the generation of income for revolutionary activities. Such enterprises might include restaurants, hotels, nightclubs, recreational facilities, craftworks and manufacturing.

8) American Revolutionary Vanguard encourages labor militancy, particularly in resistance to globalism, and engages in strike support activities and the creation of enterprises operated directly by the workers themselves without corporate or government involvement.

9) American Revolutionary Vanguard seeks to help the poor free themselves from state wardship through the creation of alternative assistance programs, unions for claimants of public assistance and non-governmental public works programs.

10) American Revolutionary Vanguard supports the development of cooperatives and guilds for the provision of affordable health care to the poor and workers, care for the sick and elderly, provision of reliable information to consumers and the organizing of tenants in opposition to slumlords and public housing authorities without reliance on statist, classist "zoning" laws, "building codes", "land use" regulations and other forms of government interference.

11) American Revolutionary Vanguard supports the establishment of stable monetary systems where the incomes of working people are not subject to the hidden tax of inflation. The implementation of private currency or local and regional public currency subject to a gold or silver standard would be the proper method for achieving this aim.

12) American Revolutionary Vanguard opposes state-controlled education and works for the ultimate abolition of both government schools and compulsory school attendance laws. State schools should be replaced by community based neighborhood schools, home schools, self-education via individual tutors, the internet and CD-ROM as well as private schools for those who desire them.

13) American Revolutionary Vanguard supports the establishment of special clubs for youth oriented towards various forms of fashion, music, entertainment, sports and other features of youth culture along with the parallel provision of sound political education and training in firearms safety, competency and civilian defense techniques.

14) American Revolutionary Vanguard works for the creation of special organizations for the defense and protection of youth, students, runaways, the homeless, the mentally ill, street vendors and other small-time enteprenuers, prisoners, addicts and prostitutes. These classes of persons are the most victimized and brutalized by the present system and are therefore in need of special assistance and recognition of their plight.

15) American Revolutionary Vanguard works for the abolition of all laws criminalizing consensual adult behaviors including drug laws, gun laws, sex laws, prohibition of alternative medical treatments, prohibition of suicide, seat belt and motorcycle helmet laws, zoning laws, involuntary civil committment and drinking ages. Only acts of physical aggression against other people and their possessions can justly be considered crimes.

16) American Revolutionary Vanguard supports the abolition of jails and prisons which are simply the modern version of slavery. Persons who do minor harms to others should be required to compensate the victims in some way with economic sanctions being the primary means of enforcement. Serious criminals should be sent to separate, penal communities where they will work ordinary jobs, live in ordinary housing, wear ordinary clothes, etc. but pay restitution to compensate victims and finance whatever supervision they may require.

17) American Revolutionary Vanguard supports both formal and informal, individual and collective, resistance to the tax system. Taxes are a means by which working people and small businessmen are robbed in order to subsidize corporate welfare, the financing of tyrannical foreign regimes, military aggression against other nations, the fascist War on Drugs and the prison-industrial complex.

18) American Revolutionary Vanguard unconditionally supports the right of all persons to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense against any threat to their lives, liberty, family and property including government. Persons who use firearms for criminal purposes should be sent to penal communities.

19) American Revolutionary Vanguard calls for the establishment of a neighborhood-by-neigborhood, city-by-city, county-by-county volunteer civilian militia system for the purpose of resisting creeping domestic and global tyranny. Such militias may be either entirely private militia, operating without any government involvement whatsoever, or locally-based public militias, under the supervision of local political institutions.

20) American Revolutionary Vanguard supports the establishment of locally-based common law courts supervised by volunteer juries and private judges not connected to the state. Such courts should serve as as alternative to and eventual replacement of the corrupt, incompetent, tyrannical state legal system. In addition, common law juries are to have the right to acquit any defendant for any reason.

21) American Revolutionary Vanguard recognizes the right of all individuals to declare themselves "sovereign" citizens whereby all legal obligations for taxes, the obtainment of drivers' licenses or social security cards or the display of motor vehicle tags may be renounced in exchange for the forfeiture of one's right to use public services or vote in public elections.

22) American Revolutionary Vanguard seeks dialogue and mutually advantageous cooperation with non-political outlaw organizations including street gangs, motorcycle clubs and prison gangs. We applaud those organizations of this type who have negotiated truces among themselves and who have sought to take up political struggle. We seek similar dialogue and cooperation with non-political, non-governmental clubs, leagues, orders, guilds, unions, fraternities and sororities of every kind.

23) American Revolutionary Vanguard supports the seeking of local and regional elective office by revolutionary candidates. Useful offices might include city councils, county boards of supervisors, zoning commissions, school boards, local sheriff and state representative. In addition, parallel, provisional political institutions should be established at the local level.

24) American Revolutionary Vanguard opposes all military aggression by the government of the United States against other nations. The natural allies of American revolutionaries are nationalist, separatist, anti-globalist, populist, anarchist, libertarian and class struggle movements throughout the world. The peoples of the earth who desire sovereignty for themselves are asked to support the struggle of domestic American revolutionaries, whether they be Arabic or Islamic nationalists, European separatists, anarchists or anti-globalists, indigenous peoples everwhere and Latin American rebel forces.

25) American Revolutionary Vanguard aims to organize and actively engage the enemy on all fronts for the purpose of carrying out a comprehensive program of political, economic, social, cultural and military struggle against the common foe and the establishment of a decentralized collection of independent regions, communties, free cities, sovereign townships and counties, villages and kingdoms, tribes, republics and homelands in place of the tyrannical empire to whom the peoples of North America are now subject.