-The Genetics Of Racial Traits: Fact And Fiction-

[Otto Rahn]

-The Genetics Of Racial Traits: Fact And Fiction-
By Peter Georgakarakos

There are many falacies in society concerning genetics, and unfortunately,
nearly as many in our movement. The first and simplest findings of the father
of genetics, Austrian botanist Gregor Mendel (1822-1884), working with dwarf
pea plants, and the myriad discoveries since then, paint a picture at variance
with many movement claims on genetics, eugenies,etc.

We hear alot about "blonde hair" and "blue eyes" being the "trait" of
Aryans,but almost all those who make these remarks know zero about the genetic
factors concerning such physiological traits. A brief glimpse into how genes
and traits are actually related is enlightening.

Most physiological traits, like height, looks, strength, etc., are governed by
the combinations of many genes, called gene sequences. But there are some
traits determined by a single gene, and these simple configurations can give
us a model from which larger sequence processes can be inferred.

Traits such as blood type and eye color are governed by a single gene, which
itself has two alternate forms called alleles. Two alleles, one from each
parent, make a complete gene which determines a trait. The genetic
configuration of a person is what geneticists call a phenotype; the physical
manifestation is what is called a genotype.

Some alleles are dominant, meaning it takes but one to manifest a specific
trait; and some are recessive, which means it takes two alleles- one from each
parent- to manifest a specific trait.

An example is as follows: Father has brown eyes, Mother has brown eyes, but
their phenotypes are one brown eye allele and one green eye allele each, they
then have four children, 3 with brown eyes, one with green.
The dominannt and recessive traits manifest in a ratio 3 to 1.......

We can see from the above example that a dominant allele "overridw' a
recessive one, not in the phenotype, where it is preserved, but in the
genotype- the actual manifestation. This, incidentally, is my family
phenotype for eye color, which
is why I have a brown-eyed (brown-haired) father, mother, and sister, but I
was born with blonde hair and green eyes. This re-combination of dormant
traits is a simple form of what is called Atavism. (Our people have lots of
such dormant traits far more important than eye color, but that is another
story). The above
example shows us two very important things concerning how genes really work:
first, that genetics is statistical, and therefore absent an actual
evolutionary advantage, the percentage of traits in a population tends to
remain the same. Secondly, and more importantly,that the double allele and its
consequent variations of traits is a natural mechanism of evolution, varying
populations so that traits
can, if evolutionarily inequal, compete.

Ignorance of these two facts can be seen on two extremes- Black Supremacists
whose ignorance of genetics leads them to declare a dominant gene as a sign of
a dominant Race; and White Supremacists whose equal ignorance leads them to
suppose some natural Aryan traits as a mark of "miscegenated blood."

An important aspect of genetic understanding is the recognition that Race is a
huge factor, derived from uncountable genes. Hardline racial traits-
creativity, skin color, head shape, facial features- are the product of large
gene sequences.Thus the odds against miscegenation causing a person to have
pure white skin and pure black hair are literally billions to one. That is why
absent actual interbreeding of races (or cosmetic treatment), we don't see
blacks with long wavy hair or whites with afros. These gene sequences are
simply too complex for such simple transference. The hair of Europeans is
totally different from the hair of Africans, the former being tube-like and
the latter being flat, which is why it is kinky. Thus to suppose the trait of
black hair in Aryans-absent to the
kinkiness- to have come from African genes is a foolish mistake which
disregards the facts of gene sequences.

The process of evolution proceeds via mutations in genes. The chances of a
cell having a mutated gene is 1 in 10. Mutations are common, but only a
mutation in the sex cells- sperm and ova- called gametes, can cause change
which is hereditary. And, most mutations are
deleterious, not positive, and cause severe birth defects and often death.
This is why evolution is such a slow process.

Almost all mutations create new genes which are recessive, alterations of a
dominant gone. Therefore, the first Aryan's eyes had to be brown, and other
colors a more recent alteration, or blue, green, and gray eyes would be
dominant. Thus with hair color also, for blonde and red hair are recessive.
This means that Aryans have always had brown eyes and brown and black hair,and
unless this
proves somehow to be evolutionarily disadvantageous, they will for a very long
time to come.

We can give an example of this origination process of mutation and population
adaptation. We use here as an example, a male with the original dominant brown
eye gene, and a female whose gene has turned into a recessive blue eye gene,
because the blue eye alleles are recessive, the first generation all have a
blue eye phenotype, but all brown eye genotypes. This generation would, of
course, interbreed, back into the "BB" population and give rise to another all
brown-eyed generation, half of which would carry the dormant blue eye gene.
This generation, being cousins, could, historically, (not so much today)
interbreed, bringing about the first generation with blue-eyed persons. (This
is why royal families and aristocracies of old intentionally interbred
cousins- it ensures good bloodlines and is the quickest aid to evolution. It
is also a strong argument against centralized culture-the larger the community
and gene pool, the less likely new recessive genes will combine, and thus the
slower the process of evolution). Once the recessive gene is matched and
manifested, the rate of brown to blue eye births approaches the figure Mendel
discovered for single gene traits- 3 to 1- and then stabilizes there. Whereas
Aryans have had gene alterations causing blue eyes and green eyes and gray
eyes, it does appear that this is nature's intention for our people. In fact,
a large part of Elizabeth Taylor's famed beauty was due to her
distinctly indigo eyes; had she borne children, perhaps we'd have another
color. But this is Nature's work, and we must be careful that we- mere
children in the eyes of nature- do not tamper in ways we believe are good, and
thereby interfere with a far more noble aim.

Aesthetic traits can only he advantageous if selected in a population by
physical dominance and/or a higher rate of reproduction;many factors figure
into the evolutionary process.For example, the Amish people have a popular
hereditary trait called "six finger dwarfism". This is a recessive gene which
manifests as small extra fingers and toes. In a warrior population, perhaps
such a trait would improve bi-pedal agility and tactile dexterity.To such an
extent that this genotype would become a dominant population-in time a
veritable new race. But in the Amish, a pacifist people, it is about as
evolutionary as blue eyes in a warrior population- that is, not at all.

The "blonde haired, blue eyed" Aryan is a mythologem in the true scientific
sense of the word. It is an archetypal image (Nietzsche's "blonde beast") of
Aryan Man. Only Aryans have traits such as blonde or red hair, blue, green, or
gray eyes, so these traits represent an image unique to our people with which
we idealistically identify. But to invert this mythologem and consider any of
these traits "more" Aryan is pure ignorance of genetics.Those who have never
done anything Aryan (noble) in their lives, save being
born blonde, like this fallacious argument most of all.

Most of the leaders of the Third Reich were not blonde, and WWII Germany
dominated Aryan life over blonder nations such as those of Scandinavia and
Estonia. And Ireland, an isolated island nation on the extremity of Europe,
has always had a large black-haired population-amidst its notorious redheads-
called (before pro-black revisionists began reading too much into
everything)the "Black Irish". This was traditionally said to be an ancient
trait inherited from a population of raven-haired Celts. (Although I'm sure
there are reactionaries among us who would rather "blame" it on the I.R.A.!).

The Aryan Race always was and still is great for its will, creativity,
intelligence,and Faustian Soul. There are great Aryan men and women in all
shapes and sizes, and with every hair and eye color that the Gods have blessed
us with.The science of genetics reinforces this understanding, and for all our
children's sake; so must we.

[Felix (POL)]

in ogni gruppo umano esistono "tipi ideali" che assumono un alto valore estetico e simbolico. Nel contesto dei popoli arii il tipo ideale di riferimento è indubbiamente il dolicocefalo biondo dagli occhi celesti, anche nelle popolazioni arie a predominanza bruna, come quelle mediterranee e caucaso-scito-iraniche. I protoarii non saranno mai stati tutti dolicocefali biondi, ma hanno impresso il sigillo di questo magnifico prototipo alle successive forme etnorazziali della grande famiglia ariana.