Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?

[Ibrahim]

Se qualcuno di voi fosse ancora interessato a saperne di più....

CLIKKA QUI!!!

Ciao a tutti

[Oli]

Molto interessante.

[Ibrahim]

lo so.

[stellarossa1959]

Ma c'è qualcuno ancora in giro che crede alle panzane di Washington?

[bluedanube]

[SILVIA]Pazzesco[/SILVIA]

[inwin=400]911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/videos/wtc1_close_frames.html[/inwin]

Le esplosioni sull tetto sono evidenti ...

Le 12 'freeze-framed' (sembra) vengono da questo video

North Tower collapse from northeast mpeg
This 29-second video shows the top of the North Tower from the northeast,
with the collapse staring about 16 seconds into the video.

[bluedanube]

it is observed that one FIRST sees the antenna collapse by approximately 10 - 20 feet. It is necessary to compare the top right corner of the building exterior, versus the first "segment line" of the antenna. Note the wind-driven 'trail' of the smoke, versus the smoke being ejected into the wind - from an 'event' inside the building.

Next, (looking through the general smoke) an intermediate set of "puff lines" of smoke are uniquely seen - ABOVE the aircraft impact entry hole - from the top floor, down to the impact point. The "puff lines" extend along the entire floor line, escaping from the windows, of course. Those unique uniform linear "puff lines" are the smoking gun, as the "puff line" can ONLY occur, if the floor BELOW the "puff line" is solid, allowing the necessary compression, which pushes the smoke outward. No solid floor = NO "PUFF."

Any significant fire would have been at least one floor below the last "puff line!" That indicates the collapse of the cooler upper floors; (core column collapse) not the heavily fire damaged floors - immediately above the fire.

[Ibrahim]

ottime queste immagini....direi rivelatrici!