"Ahmadinejad è come Hitler"

[stuart mill]

Uno ha parcheggiato dove volevo parcheggiare io: è il nuovo Hitler.

[Shambler]

Non c'è niente da ridere: ha persino i capelli neri come Hitler.

[Il Condor]

Non c'è niente da ridere: ha persino i capelli neri come Hitler.

... ed e' pure il Presidente, democraticamente eletto, del "Paese degli Arani", proprio come il Vecchio Adolf...

[stuart mill]

Non c'è niente da ridere: ha persino i capelli neri come Hitler.

e la faccia? e i baffi (vabbè, quello ha la barba, ma chi pensa a sti dettagli è antisemita) sono molto simili, urge bombardamento atomico

[Il Condor]

Non capisco perche' i forumisti nazi vogliano respingere questo accostamento, che invece dovrebbero accogliere con grande e sincera gioia.

I neo-nazi tedeschi al mondiale tifavano, come seconda squadra, per l'Iran...

[Shambler]

Si fa il bidè, come Hitler, quindi è nazista.

[aprile crudele]

The term reductio ad Hitlerum (sometimes rendered reductio ad Hitlerem; whimsical Latin for "reduction to Hitler") was originally coined by University of Chicago professor and ethicist Leo Strauss. The phrase comes from the more well-known logical argument reductio ad absurdum. It is a variety of association fallacy and may also be described as argumentum ad nazium. The relatively frequent occurrence of such absurd lines of reasoning in Usenet discussions led to the formulation of Godwin's Law in 1990.

The reductio ad Hitlerum fallacy is of the form "Adolf Hitler or the Nazi party supported X; therefore X must be evil". This fallacy is often effective due to the near-instant condemnation of anything to do with Hitler or the Nazis.

The fallacious nature of this argument is best illustrated by identifying X as something that Adolf Hitler or his supporters did promote but which is not considered evil — for example, X = "promoting expressways", X = "wearing khakis", X = "painting watercolors", or X = "eating food". It is important to understand that those policies advocated by Hitler and his party that are generally considered evil, are all condemned by themselves, not because Hitler supported them. In other words: they are not evil because Hitler advocated them, but rather Hitler was evil because he advocated them. It may also be refuted through counterexamples:

* Dwight Eisenhower, who despised Hitler's criminality, admired his Autobahnen and promoted the Interstate Highway System in the United States.
* Hitler's arch-enemy Sir Winston Churchill also painted.
* U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who asked Congress for a Declaration of War, and his successor Harry Truman, who continued to prosecute the war against Germany, also owned dogs.
* German-American scientist Albert Einstein was also a vegetarian.

[stuart mill]

[Decima Regio]

The term reductio ad Hitlerum (sometimes rendered reductio ad Hitlerem; whimsical Latin for "reduction to Hitler") was originally coined by University of Chicago professor and ethicist Leo Strauss. The phrase comes from the more well-known logical argument reductio ad absurdum. It is a variety of association fallacy and may also be described as argumentum ad nazium. The relatively frequent occurrence of such absurd lines of reasoning in Usenet discussions led to the formulation of Godwin's Law in 1990.

The reductio ad Hitlerum fallacy is of the form "Adolf Hitler or the Nazi party supported X; therefore X must be evil". This fallacy is often effective due to the near-instant condemnation of anything to do with Hitler or the Nazis.

The fallacious nature of this argument is best illustrated by identifying X as something that Adolf Hitler or his supporters did promote but which is not considered evil — for example, X = "promoting expressways", X = "wearing khakis", X = "painting watercolors", or X = "eating food". It is important to understand that those policies advocated by Hitler and his party that are generally considered evil, are all condemned by themselves, not because Hitler supported them. In other words: they are not evil because Hitler advocated them, but rather Hitler was evil because he advocated them. It may also be refuted through counterexamples:

* Dwight Eisenhower, who despised Hitler's criminality, admired his Autobahnen and promoted the Interstate Highway System in the United States.
* Hitler's arch-enemy Sir Winston Churchill also painted.
* U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who asked Congress for a Declaration of War, and his successor Harry Truman, who continued to prosecute the war against Germany, also owned dogs.
* German-American scientist Albert Einstein was also a vegetarian.

Il termine reductio ad Hitlerum mi sembra proprio una stronzata.

Contropropongo (anche per il povero Ing. Ahmadinejad) elevatio ad Hitlerum ! Ekkekkazzo !

[Cavaliere (POL)]

Ti sbagli. AHmadinejad non è come Hitler, lui è Hitler.

Reincarnato?