Padre Saenz y Arriaga - The New Montinian Church

[Guelfo Nero]

Cari amici,

questo thread sarà dedicato alla figura e all'opera di Padre Saenz y Arriaga, uno dei primi sacerdoti messicani, degno erede dei Cristeros, che tematizzò la Vacanza della Sede apostolica alla fine degli anni '60.
Della compagnia ignaziana, Padre Saenz ha testimonianato con la propria vita la necessità di scegliere tra i due stendardi, quello di Cristo e della sua Chiesa e non quello del mondo e di Satana.
Il suo sedevacantismo ricco di felici spunti, semplice, generoso, talvolta problematico, fu inverato poi dalla Tesi dell'Eccellenza Des Lauriers.

un saluto cordiale

Guelfo Nero


NOVA ECCLESIA MONTINIANA

Fr. Joaquin Saenz Y Arriaga, PhD.
(Doctor of Philosophy, Theology and Canon Law)

FATHER SAENZ PRIEST and DEFENDER OF THE FAITH

Father Joaquin Saenz y Arriaga of Mexico, Doctor of
Philosophy, Theology and Canon Law, international author and
lecturer, was ordained a Jesuit priest of the Roman Catholic
Church, April 30, 1930: he celebrated his first Mass in the
city of Guadalajara, Jalisco on May 2nd.

An untiring defender of the orthodox Catholic Church, he
traveled the world in his battle to preserve Catholic tradition
and the St. Pius V Mass. One of 3 spiritual leaders at both
Marches-On-Rome in the early 70's, Fr. Saenz ranks among the
world's top Catholic traditionalists. Withdrawing from the
Jesuit Order when it became corrupted, he settled in Mexico
City, running a Catholic residence for students. To many of
his countrymen, he symbolized their fight against spreading
Communism in Mexico. He is the learned writer of more than 60
books, devoted to exposure of the moral and theological
corruption that quietly infiltrated the post-conciliar Church
resulting from Vatican II, including: "For Christ and Against
Christ," "Apostolate," "The New Mass Is Not the One Catholic
Mass" and "Vacant See."

Fr. Saenz's 648 page book "THE NEW MONTINIAN CHURCH" was
published August 15, 1971 in Mexico and became the cause of
this militantly loyal, orthodox priest's excommunication in
1972. Eventually, the book was fully published in Spanish and
Italian ... but not English. The four chapters that follow,
appearing in English for the first time, are especially
appropriate to happenings in the Church today.

Prior to the early 60's, the Catholic Church flourished
... parish schools were well-staffed and attended; seminaries
and convents had their choice of applicants; church attendance
and reception of the sacraments broke records; converts by the
thousands helped swell the census of the faithful. The
Church's future literally glittered. Then Vatican II and its
subsequent renewal descended upon the Church ... and the
Church's marks of progress were reversed. The NOVUS ORDO
developed over the ensuing years and thousands of the faithful
refused to accept it, searching for their Holy Mass. In late
August and early September, 1976, the secular and Catholic
press abounded with bold headlines about a French rebel bishop
who defied the Vatican by celebrating a traditional Latin Mass
(attended by more than 7000 French Catholics) and ordaining his
own priests under papal threat of excommunication. But nothing
was said about the centuries-old plot that led to Vatican II
and this explosive situation.

These chapters, from Fr. Saenz's 1971 book, document some
of the background to today's crisis in the Church, wherein he
reveals his convictions about Pope Paul: he outlines the plot
against the Church; he exposes Paul's programs to bring about
an alliance between the Vatican and Communist countries; and he
interprets and examines the message that grew out of the 1971
World Conference on Religion and Peace.

Fr. Joaquin Saenz passed to his eternal reward in April,
1976. May his soul rest in peace.


MY CONVICTION ABOUT POPE MONTINI

In these troubled times, the conscience of sincere
Catholics is heavily burdened ... perhaps more so than at any
other time in the Church's history. WITHIN OUR CONFLICT, WE
HAVE A BURNING DESIRE TO REMAIN TRUE CATHOLICS TO THE FULL
EXTENT OF THE WORD, just as our parents did. We realize that
our day of judgment and of Divine Justice will come; we must
justify our protection of the Faith. At the same time, we
recognize that the direction of the Pastoral Council is to
gradually change our acceptance of the traditional, apostolic
doctrine of the Church ... and we rebel at this change of
mentality. Those who firmly support the orthodox faith
scandalize those who accept the changing doctrine of the
Church. The orthodox Catholics are told: "IT IS THE POPE WHO
COMMANDS IT. ABOVE ALL, WE MUST OBEY THE POPE."

To those who profess strong obedience to the Papacy, I
say: St. Pius V, his predecessors Paul III, Julius III, Pius
IV, were also Popes ... it was within their Papacies that the
Ecumenical Council of Trent was celebrated; also Leo XIII, St.
Pius X, Benedict XV, Pius XI, and Pius XII were Popes who
solemnly and infallibly ratified the results of Vatican I. But
there is obvious contradiction between teachings of the
Pre-conciliar Church and what is today called the
Post-conciliar Church and what they call a change in mentality,
I, in good conscience, call a CHANGE IN FAITH.

In order to understand the reasons behind THIS CHANGE IN
FAITH and the disconcerting silence of the Catholic Hierarchy,
it is necessary to focus our attention on Pope MONTINI, THE MAN
... for it is only through knowledge of his background that
anyone can understand his seemingly unexplainable activity;
address themselves to his dialectics and realize why the
MONTINIAN Church is totally distinct from the Church that
emerged from the Council of Trent and Vatican I. For these
Councils faithfully guarded apostolic tradition and we must
never forget it!

Because we believe in God ... in Jesus Christ, true God
and true Man; because we believe in the Holy Catholic Church
(in Divine Revelation, traditional catechetics, dogmatic
theology and the Church Councils as the basis of our divine
Faith), we also believe in the powers of the Papacy and the
ecclesiastical authority of our bishops. It is precisely
because I (and many staunch Catholics) have the faith, that
doubt swelled up within my soul, as discrepancies from
traditional teaching became apparent. Suddenly I am faced with
a monumental decision ... what to follow? Is Paul VI a
legitimate Pope or not?

Some say that Paul VI is a captive; that he is forced to
act against his conscience in order to save his life; that he
has fallen into personal heresy; that drugs are intermittently
administered to him (by his conspirator-captors). This
hypothesis appears indefensible and unsatisfactory to us, as
Paul VI continues in the Papacy with all his superauthority.
In all of these instances, the "rock," THE SOLID FOUNDATION OF
THE CHURCH, does not possess the immovable stability that
guarantees the permanence of the Church.

In a second hypothesis, some believe that John B. Montini
was validly elected Pope, but after the election he fell into
personal heresy. For this reason, Paul automatically ceased
being Pope and lost all of his powers and prerogatives. But
his heresies are still manifest. Paul VI did sign the mistaken
documents of Vatican II: he approved and imposed the Novus Ordo
Missal ... and, for whatever reasons, he has not used his
authority to correct substantial error, to save the essential
parts of the Mass.

Still others maintain that the election of John B. Montini
was invalid because false credentials and information was used
to establish his qualifications. Some claim he was outside the
Church and for a variety of reasons was unworthy of
consideration for the Papacy. Thus, he was incapable of being
validly elected.

Is Paul VI a legitimate Pope, or not? Failure to exercise
sound judgement, based on solid information, would be reckless,
scandalous and with dire consequences. BUT TO DENY THE
EXISTENCE OF THE QUESTION IS APRIORISTIC, considering the
relationship of the world and the Church today. We can not
ignore the need to investigate and seek the truth. We have
sufficient evidence of Paul VI's dialectic actions to demand an
exhaustive investigation into his doctrines, both before and
after his election. We should learn more about his personal
life, his personal relationships with other people and
organizations ... before, during and after the Council.
Someday, when death will have ended his influence and power and our REVERENT FEAR fades into history, I have no doubt that an impartial and objective judgement will be made ... as has
always been done concerning pontiffs of past centuries.

Though we desire to grow by the judgement of history, we
find ourselves in a crisis today ... a circumstance whose
implications urgently demand explanation and resolution in
order to save our Catholic faith. We must end the terrible
enigma of Pope Montini.

Let us examine pictures which have appeared in
communications media of Paul VI with the Pectoral of Judaism
and the Ephod of the great Levite priest of Judaism ...
therein, may be a decisive key. Notice the unorthodox ritual
sign above the chest of the Pope and keep in mind the current
subversion of the Church, the confessed infiltration of the
Jews, Masons, and Communists into the clergy. Though we do not
know the total extent of Pope Montini's secret and public
relations with the worst enemies of the Church, we can study
the steps he has taken to reform the Church, destroy its
structure and, little by little, eliminate the Marks of
Catholicism, blending the Church into other religions. I
exhort you to remember Montini's visits and discussions at the
United Nations and the Geneva World Council of Churches; his
ecumenical surrender, his humanistic dialog lacking spiritual
quality. I believe we have the right ... even the obligation
... to ask this question: Is John B. Montini a true Catholic
... or, is he an infiltrator, a Jewish director for the Mafia?
I have been suspicious for some time. Now, I have near-certain
evidence that Paul VI is not a legitimate Pope, but an
anti-Pope ... a trained Jew, employed by the Mafia to use
diabolical but undiscerned methods, employing time, money and
the unquestionable ability of those who have always dreamed of
dominating the World.

For centuries, the Church has preached and fought against
secularization, militant atheism, anticlericalisms. Recall
such bloody, religious persecution as followed Calvary ...
remember Spain and Mexico. Who would have thought the SILENT CHURCH today, would be the center of convergence for national and international statesmen, especially those from the
Communist world; those dominated by Masonry or international
directors of Judaism? Who would have believed that the hard
line against Communism (taken by previous Popes) would change
itself into friendly "dialog" with the comings and goings of
Cardinals Bea, Willebrands, Suenens and Koening? The
persecution of the Church in Yugoslavia, Hungary and Cuba has
terminated ... has been replaced with cordial diplomatic
relations, in what appears to be a compromise between the
Vatican and these atheistic states.

Though their dictatorial governments and attending laws
persist, the Vatican collaborates in a true and progressive
integration (according to the words of the Papal Nuncio of
Cuba), implanting Communism as the indispensable preparation of
a climate ready for world domination by Judaism. The glorious
martyrdom of Cardinals Mindszenty and Stepinac was the price
with which Paul VI purchased coexistence and collaboration
between these two rivals.

In their Messianic materialism, the directors of Judaism
dream of an implementation of world government wherein they are
the masters and we are their slaves. They recognize that the
insurmountable wall that lies in the path of this program of
conquest is the religious wall ... in particular, the wall of
the Catholic Church. By experience, they know that slander,
prisons, even death, does not crush the faith ... it only
enlivens it. They know very well that in order to destroy the
Church of Christ they have only one road left ... INFILTRATION.
Thus, THE CASE OF ANACLETUS II IS REPEATING ITSELF, the
infiltrators, denounced by Pius X, have invaded the hierarchy
and have even captured the Chair of Peter.

To have a world government, it is imperative to establish
a one world religion; the religion of universal brotherhood, of
"ecumenism," of "dialog" ... a kind of syncretized religion,
which eliminates and silences the dogmas, turns the rites
towards worldly things, compromises customs and suppresses
discipline. Thus, all religions melt into only one religion,
supported and complimented by a world government.

And what would be the perfect coverup for this intelligent
program? Why, the Council of the Catholic Church, wherein
prelates are skillfully guided by Pope Montini, decreeing
(himself) the "ECUMENISM, " the "AGGIORNAMENTO," the "RELIGIOUS LIBERTY," the "REFORM" of liturgy, morals, discipline, rites and dogmas. All to be accomplished with skill, dialectics and cunningness using two fronts ... the epistles and the promised spring of the Church, the new Pentecost. With the movement ofthe masses, the false laws, the watered-down celebration, the multiplication of national and international organizations (like Cursillos of Christianity; the Christian Family Movement, etc.), constant conferences of clergy and laity to indoctrinate the neophytes into the new religion; the "acts of living together;" the "experiments;" the post-conciliar terminology
(authenticity, compromise, conscientiousness, relativism,
desacralization, etc.) ... the most apt means were employed to
engender the necessary confusion. They were designed to
eliminate ancient prejudices and beliefs of those with scruples
of conscience, that they might be logically led to the new
religion ... the religion of universal brotherhood.

All this would be possible by placing the absolute power
of the Church in the hands of the "Mafia." JUDAISM, PLAYING
ITS CARDS DECISIVELY TO GAIN ITS AMBITION, PUSHED (as I
indicated before) ALL THEIR RESOURCES INTO THE GAME. IT WAS
NECESSARY TO INFILTRATE THE VATICAN!

Many who observed the weaknesses of Pope Montini (his
vacillations; his ambiguities ... wherein his words were
contradicted by his deeds; his double standards, evidenced by
his friendly relations with sworn enemies of the Church), still
recognize him as the legitimate Pope in spite of his heresy and
unfulfilled obligations of his office. These people readily
acknowledge that a future pope could be a false pope (an
anti-pope), but they persist in maintaining the legitimacy of
the present Pontiff. Frightened by the possibility that they
are living through the reign of a false pope, they ignore all
that history and theology has soundly taught us.

But I cannot ignore the evidence, the habitual adornment
of the "EPHOD" in photograph after photograph of Paul VI, and
the subsequent denouncement made by the Abbe de Nantes in his paper "Contra Reforma." My suspicions appear confirmed ...
John Battista Montini was invalidly elected to the Papacy and,
thus, is not a true Pope. Because of this ritualistic symbol
of Judaism and Masonry, I suspect that Paul VI was not only the
most efficient instrument of the "Jewish Mafia," but an
integral part of the "Mafia." Thus, he wears on his breast
these contradictory symbols ... the pectoral cross of
Catholicism and the "Ephod, Breastplate of Judgement;" he wears
the ring of the fisherman and displays the insignia of
descendants of Caiphas, the great Levite priest.

Interesting information about the Breastplate of
Judgement, the Pectoral of Jewry (its background, description
and use in Masonic lodges) is given in the Encyclopedia of FREE
MASONRY, published in San Antonio, Texas, by Albert Gallatin
Mackey, M.D. 33 degree Mason (author of Dictionary of Free
Masonry and a textbook about Masonic laws).

"Called in Hebrew, SYMBOL OF THE ELECT, THE
CHOSEN, THE PREFERRED, the breastplate of judgement,
because through it the High Priest received divine
responses, and uttered his decisions on all matters
relating to the good of the commonwealth. It was a piece
of embroidered cloth of gold, purple, scarlet, and fine
white, twined linen. It was a span, of about nine inches
square, when doubled, and thus made strong to hold the
precious stones that were set in it. It had a gold ring
at each corner, to the uppermost of which were attached
golden chains, by which it was fastened to the
shoulder-pieces of the ephod - the vestment worn by the
High Priest over his tunic; while from the lowermost went
two ribbons of blue. by which it was attached to the
girdle of the ephod, and thus held secure in its place.

"In the breastplate were set twelve precious jewels,
on each of which was engraved the name of one of the
twelve tribes. The stones were arranged in four rows,
three stones in each row. As to the order of arrangement
and the names of the stones, there has been difference
among the authorities ... but perhaps the Vulgate
translation is to be preferred as an authority, because it
was made in the fifth century, at a time when the old
Hebrew names of the precious stones were better understood than now. The order given in that version is as follows:
emerald, topaz, sardius-jasper, sapphire,
carbuncle-amethyst, agate, ligure-beryl, onyx, chrysolite
... The order in which they were placed, according to the
Jewish Targums- is as follows, referring itself to the
respective ages of the twelve sons of Jacob: Levi, Simeon,
Reuben-Zebulun, Issachar, Judah-Gad, Naphtali, Dan-
Benjamin, Joseph, Asher. These twelve original names (of
the stones) are detailed in Exodus XXVIII ...

"The Breastplate which was used in the first Temple
does not appear to have been returned after the Captivity,
for it is not mentioned in the list of articles sent back
by Cyrus. The stones, on account of their great beauty
and value, were most probably removed from their original
arrangement and reset in various ornaments by their
captors. A new one was made for the services of the
second Temple, which according to Josephus, when worn by
the High Priest, shot forth brilliant rays of fire that
manifest the immediate presence of Jehovah. But Josephus
adds that two hundred years before his time this
miraculous power had become extinct in consequence of the
impiety of the nation. It was subsequently carried to
Rome together with the other spoils of the Temple.

"Of the subsequent fate of the these treasures, and
among them the breastplate, there are two accounts: one,
that they were conveyed to Carthage by Genseric after his
sack of Rome, and that the ship containing them was lost
on the voyage; the other, and, as King thinks, in "Antique
Gems" (page 137), the more probable one, that they had
been transferred long before that time to Byzantium, and
deposited by Justinian in the treasury of Saint Sophia.
"The breastplate is worn in American Chapters of the
Royal Arch by the High Priest as an essential part of his
official vestments. The symbolic reference of it, as
given by Webb, is that it is to teach him always to bear
in mind his responsibility to the laws and ordinances of
the Institution, and that the honor and interests of his
Chapter should be always near his heart. This does not
materially differ from the ancient symbolism, for one of
the names given to the Jewish breastplate was the
memorial, because it was designed to remind the High
Priest how dear the tribes whose names it bore should be
to his heart."

Knowing what the Freemasonry Encyclopedia tells us, and
seeing this strange "amulet" actually worn on the breast of a
Pope, I believe (without fear) that we may suspect the Jewish
influence, the Masonic influence, or the combination of the
two, on Pope Montini. Since this insignia has only been used
by the most High Levite Priest or the Most High Masonic Priest
... and because no previous Pope has ever before carried this
jewel over his breast ... our suspicions are with foundation
and believable.

Paul VI knows very well what this "Breastplate of
Judgement," the Ephod, signifies; he knows its origin is in the
ritualistic dress of the Ancient Covenant; he is not ignorant
of the fact that Masons, today, use it as a distinctive mark of
their High Priest. Are we to naively believe that he
ingeniously wears this "amulet" to humor those who gave it to
him, not knowing the responsibility it implies?

Since the Vatican II Council proclaimed the end of "the
most triumphant and unalterable Church" and the beginning of
"the Church of the Poor," Paul VI removed the Pontiff's Tiara
and sold it to the highest bidder at the New York World's Fair.
Today, this same person has no scruples in wearing so valuable
an "amulet" before those receiving first orders, NOT presenting
himself like a Pope of the Catholic Church, the successor of
Peter, The Vicar of Christ ... but like the Levite High Priest,
the successor and representative of Caiphas.

It is incompatible that the pectoral Cross of the Pope be
worn with this strange "amulet" of the Old Covenant ... an
"amulet" used in the religion of promise and preparation, a
symbolic ritual of the High Priest signifying divine preference. Wearing this "amulet" in the New Covenant, on the breast of the Vicar of Christ, could signify a denial of Christ, of His religion that is no longer promised but is the splendid Truth. It would seem that Paul VI uses this ritualistic symbol of the Most High Levite Priest to tell us that he does not accept the Truth, supporting the symbolic figure of the promise made by God. When the pectoral of Jewry, the Ephod, is united with the Cross of Christ, Pope Montini gives us the impression of someone desiring to join the Christ to the anti-Christ. "This is the characteristic of a bad
Angel," says St. Ignatius, "that he transforms himself into a
`good' Angel (appearing as the Angel of Light) in order to
enter a devoted soul and steal it away."

Going back to my earlier quotation from the Encyclopedia
of Free Masonry, we find the agreement which ties the Jewish
Mafia to the Masonic Lodges. It is clearly demonstrated that
Judaism begot the Masonic movement as a major instrument in its
satanic effort to destroy Christ and His Church. Pope Montini,
displaying the Pectoral of Jewry (the Ephod), proclaims himself
as the obedient servant, the sympathizer and friend of Judaism
and Masonry. This is more than coincidence ... it strongly
suggests that John Battisti Montini, Jewish by family ancestry,
is the agent of the "Mafia" trained to infiltrate and dominate
the Church. Cure de Ars has written: "It is impossible to be
aware of Hebrew conduct, without becoming full of fear." It is
incredible that these people, historically chosen and
predestined by God, have (through their iniquities) transformed
themselves into lasting enemies of God and persecutors of
Christ.

In order to examine the motives of Paul VI, we must
investigate the actions, statements and personal background of
John Battisti Montini:

Who are the ancestors of the Montini family? The "Gold
Book" of Italian nobility, published as the 1965-1968 edition,
does not mention the MONTINI name. However, the "Gold Book" of 1962-1964, on page 946, mentions MONTI OF CORTE; on page 947, MONTI GUARNIERE, MONTICELLI GHIZZI is named as MONZA; on page 994, we find for the first time MONTINI ... a namesake
designation related to the familiar Brescia family of nobility,
native of Val Sabbia, from which Montini derives his nobility
and original lineage of Hebrew origin (this Brescia family is
an outgrowth of the original Bartoleme (Bartolino) of
Benedictis of Hebrew background). Montini's ancestral line
traces itself through Lumezzano, Sarezzo, Nave and Concesio of
Brescia. The name repeatedly appears as noted in the register
of "Country Noblemen" between 1946 and 1948. In the gallery of
the House of MONTINI from Sarezzo, a great genealogical tree
compiled by Angelo Basio (born 1795 and councilman of the
community) is preserved. This document records noteworthy
activities of members of the Montini family in such professions
as notary publics, doctors, lawyers, religious and
ecclesiasticals ... some achieved fame in their chosen
occupations. According to the Apostolic Constitution "Urbem
Romanum," published January 4, 1746, the family was accepted
into the Roman Nobility ... its coat of arms consisted of 3
mountains with 3 fleur-de-lis superimposed; and, at times,
surrounded by 3 heads of birds. Components of this same
heraldic symbol decorate, in different arrangement, the front
of silver plates displaying a profile of Paul VI facing a
mountain of 6 peaks, his head encircled by 3 fleur-de-lis.

The parents of Paul VI were George Montini and Judith
Alghisi. George (the father) was born in 1861 and died in
1943. Ludovocio, brother of Paul and Senator of the Republic,
was born on May 8, 1896. John Battisti, the man known as Paul
VI, was born in Concesio (Brescia) on September 26, 1897.

On December 14, 1969, Martin Descalzo (a Spanish
journalist and progressive parish priest) published an article
in the "ABC" of Madrid, headlined in bold letters, attributed
to the Vatican Secretary for Unity ... but later it was
acknowledged by the North American Secretary of Relations
between Catholics and Jews ... a position filled by a Cardinal.
Here is what it said:

1. That Judaism is the deposit of liberty, dignity and
other human values which the Church must consider in its
attitudes and aspirations for mankind.

2. That, after 2000 years, the Church has recognized its
errors, asks forgiveness of the Jews and desires to establish a
dialog with them.

3. That Jews are the only elected and preferred people
with whom God has established and maintained a permanent,
indestructible bond.

4. That this religious bond (here's the purpose of the
article) confers the right to possess the Promised Land and
CALLS FOR ALL CHRISTIANS TO RECOGNIZE the establishment of the State of Israel.

5. THAT THE CHURCH OWES ITS BELIEFS, DOCTRINE,
INSTITUTIONS, CULTURE AND LITURGY TO JUDAISM.

6. That the Old Testament is automatically and
independently valid in its own right ... it does not require
the New Testament for understanding or explanation of its
meaning.

7. That the Church should avoid Bible readings that are
disfavorable to the Jewish people, especially the one
concerning the death of Jesus.

8. That Jesus, Himself, is a descendant of the Jewish
people: He identified Himself with His people in nearly
everything. When He opposed His people, He did it internally,
as the prophets before Him ... within the law of his people.

This article, denying the Divinity of Jesus Christ and the
divine institution of the Church, previously attributed to the
Vatican Secretary for Unity, was published in a Spanish daily
newspaper ("ABC") having monarchical tendencies, with the
consent of a Cardinal representing the American Secretary of
Judeo-Christian Relations. For a person who objectively
studies the present situation of the Church, this article is
very symptomatic. In earlier times, this monstrous article
would never have been published in Spain ... official and
ecclesiastical censorship would have prevented it. Now, no
one objected; no one said anything. The article appeared
without protest. Yet it was Spain whose Catholic Kings
published the Decree of Jewish Expulsion, banishing them from
their land. This new, updated Spain magnifies the change in
law, denying its history and traditions.

THE PLOT AGAINST THE CHURCH

God, in His infinite mercy, continuously offers us the
inexhaustible help of His divine grace that we may attain
eternal salvation. He gives us sufficient spiritual strength
and knowledge that we will not be deceived by our enemies nor
mislead from the path of salvation by the cunningness of Satan.
Inspired by the Holy Ghost, a long line of past Popes has
warned us of the painful prelude to the indescribable tragedy
we are witnessing today ... a course of events whose background
stretches across centuries. Pius VI , in his speech on the
martyrdom of Louis XVI: Gregory XVI, in his frequent and grave
warnings; Pius IX, in his Encyclical "Quanta Cura" and his
Syllabus; Leo XIII, in his learned encyclicals, especially
"Humanum Genus;" St. Pius X, in his "Pascendi," in his new
Syllabus and in his condemnation of The Sillon (founded by Mark
Sannier); Pius XII, in his Encyclical "Humani Generis" and his
lucid instructions of May 31 and Nov. 2, 1954 to the Bishops
around the world, alerting them and clearly explaining the
means by which they were to defend themselves against OCCULT
POWERS.

According to the pontifical teaching of such eminent
prelates as Msgr. Delassus and Msgr. Jouin as well as the brave
writers Leo Poincins, Peter Virion and Maurice Pinay, a
dreadful truth was foretold of A SATANICAL PLOT FOR WORLD
DOMINATION by the Counter-church; a plan wherein the agents of
Satan already considering themselves victorious - do not
hesitate to publish these declarations. Not only do we recall
Stanistas Guaita, the economist Roca of St. Yves d'Alveydre,
etc. and Sinarquia, but this plot is amply confirmed by the
"Judicial Records of Learned Scholars from Sion," discovered
at the end of the last century, due to an error (the OCCULT
POWER would never have permitted these documents to be
published voluntarily, since their very nature was one of
ultra-secrecy).

It is a shame that these warnings, condemnations and
revealing records were not heeded by our ecclesiastics or
faithful Catholics. Most everyone showed little interest in
their reliability, though they did not deny the incredible
possibility. And today, while suffering through the collapse
of the organized Church, we still doubt the existence of THIS
INFERNAL JUDEO-MASONIC CONSPIRACY, while it clearly celebrates its early stages of victory. Why do people ignore the
pontifical teachings ... the theologians and historians who
have been telling us of this deceitful danger, this grave
crisis that exists in the Church's history? To discover the
cause of this crisis, we must acknowledge the existence of the
Luciferian Occult Power and accept the sincerity of the secret
plot ... a plot that the Holy See possessed and was published
by Cretineau Joly in his writings: "The Roman Church before the
Revolution" and "The Judeo-Masonic Plot Against the Church."

In the 18th Century, the Jew, Adam Weishaupt (leader of
the Order of Illuminati), wrote: "The Free Masons should
control all men of every class, nation, and religion;
dominating them without obvious compulsion; uniting them
through a strong bond; inspiring them with enthusiasm to spread
common ideas; and with utmost secrecy and energy, direct them
toward this singular objective throughout the world. IT IS
THROUGH THE INTIMACY OF SECRET SOCIETIES THAT THESE OPINIONS WILL BE FORMED." (From the original writings of the Order of the Illuminati - 1765, Munich, as cited by Barruel in his
"Memoirs Explaining the History of Jacobinism").

The important idea is to control "public opinion." In his
leaflet, "How To Form Public Opinion," Maurice Talmeyer
describes this strategy and its dreadful effect: "After men
have declared themselves and become dedicated to a single
school of thought, they are capable of convincing others.
Thus, `public opinion' unfolds and solidifies without people
being aware of the controls. A `consensus' is formed among
people who do not consciously identify with each other, but
learn to think and judge the same way, performing as planned.
Though this `consensus' was artificially contrived, it publicly
appears and quickly influences our society."

And Weishaupt issued the order: "Train Christians to
believe that Jesus Christ was the great inventor of the Masonic
trinomial, `liberty, equality, and fraternity'; that this is
the doctrine taught by Him, but should be understood according
to the interpretation of the Order." "Our doctrine is the same
divine doctrine that Jesus Christ taught to His disciples, the
evolution of His intimate and true feelings having been
confided to the secret discourses of the Orders. And here's
the plot: This doctrine (taught and explained) offers all
humanity the way to achieve complete liberty ... no one has so
adequately explained the road to liberty as our Eminent Jesus
of Nazareth."

From Florence, on August 5, 1806, Simonini exposed the
Plan of the Occult Power to Abbe Barruel; a plan that one of
the most-high dignitaries had told him in confidence.
Immediately, the Abbe communicated this to Pope Pius VII, who
assured us of the authenticity and cited these essential
passages:

4. In Italy, they already count among their members more
than 800 clergymen, including as many secular priests as those
from an order, among which are many parish priests, professors,
and prelates as well as some bishops and cardinals who, for
this reason, have not lost hope of having a pope of their
party.

5. That they also have many men of their party among the
clergy in Spain.

6. They are considering the destruction of the Borbones
family (their greatest enemy) within the next few years.

A short while later, high ranking leaders resumed their
drive towards identical ends, instructing Christians that
"Christianity is essentially a democratic doctrine that teaches
equality and brotherhood." One secret instruction, dated 1819,
said precisely: "An idea has eternally inspired the minds of
men to aspire towards universal renewal: the audacious day when Italy shall be liberated; then THE LIBERATION OF THE ENTIRE WORLD, establishing a Federal Republic, the peace of
brotherhood. But there is one tremendous obstacle, THE CHURCH. Our goal is the same as Voltaire's in the French Revolution; TOTAL ANNIHILATION OF CATHOLICISM AND THE SPIRIT OF CHRISTIANITY ... the Pope, whomever he shall be, has not yet seen fit to join the Secret Societies; therefore, the Secret
Societies must take the first step toward conquering the
Church. With the establishment of acceptable standards, we
must show them the dangers of fanaticism; they must consider
the happiness they will have by extending the great principles
of social equality and religious liberty, turning against
intolerance and persecution. And they will conclude: `The law
of social progress is here and only here; do not bother
attaining it any other way.'"

"This above all we should earnestly seek (and acquire)
with the same desire with which the Jews hope for their Messiah
... A POPE THAT MEETS OUR REQUIREMENTS ... ; and for this
reason, TO DESTROY THE ROCK UPON WHICH GOD HAS BUILT HIS
CHURCH. When we have the small finger of Peter's successor
compromised into the plot, it will serve to organize this
Crusade against all the Urbanos II and all those San Bernardos
of Christianity ..."

"It is necessary that our forces achieve this goal. But,
how? The unknown is not yet known. Nevertheless, nothing
shall dissuade us from this course; on the contrary, everything
pushes us toward it ... we ardently seek the best counsel of
the Supreme Court ... " These counsels are truly Luciferian.

"Smash the enemy, whoever he shall be; smash his power or
strength with slander and malicious accusation; but, above all,
smash it while it is still new. It is the Youth we must reach;
without their realization, we must entice the youngsters and
prepare them under the banner of Secret Societies. To
accomplish this, we must be as pure as doves, but as cunning as
a serpent," ... it is a normal practice to rearrange these
directions and expose them as standard under the veil of
"keeping absolutely secret" all that relates to the HIGH PLACE,
"because (it is understood that) anyone who reveals the
secrets, voluntarily or involuntarily, automatically signs his
own death sentence."

"Therefore, in order to secure a Pope that meets our
requirements, we must prepare a generation worthy of his
kingdom. Forget the older, more mature peoples; go to the
youth and, if possible, even the infants ... ; immediately,
earn a sound reputation for yourself in schools, colleges and
universities ... also, in seminaries. Then, after gaining the
confidence of the professors and students, influence those
preparing to become priests and who seek your favor. Thus, our
doctrines will be planted in the hearts of younger clergy and
be accepted throughout the convents. Within a few years, these
young clergy, through the success of these events, will have
invaded all operations; these young clergymen will eventually
become those that govern, administer, advise and make up the
counsel for the Supreme Court; they will be the ones called
upon to elect the next Pontiff ... a Pontiff, who, like his
contemporaries, has been imbued with those Italian and
humanitarian principles which we have begun to place in
circulation."

"Having earned the loyalty of the Pope, whose position we
have given him ... ; the clergy will march under your banner
because they will believe the Pope marches under the banner of
the Apostolic keys ... thus, your trap is extended into the
innermost corners of sacristy, seminaries and convents ...
conquering friends to the right of the Apostolic Chair. WHEN
THIS IS ACCOMPLISHED, YOU WILL HAVE ESTABLISHED A REVOLUTION LEAD BY THE TIARA (emblematic of papal authority) and the pluvial cape ... A REVOLUTION BROUGHT ABOUT WITH LITTLE FORCE, BUT WILL STRIKE A FLAME IN THE FOUR CORNERS OF THE WORLD."

And in other instructions, they said: "Flatter all the
passions, even the most wicked, making them appear virtuous ...
it is necessary that the teaching of the Church appear to
violate public morality ... in order that a Papal revolution
can triumph ... giving the torch to all who aspire to carry it
... subtly slipping the seed of our dogmas into their spiritual
lifestyle ... so that clergymen and laymen convince themselves
that Christianity is essentially a democratic doctrine."
(Published writings of 1765 in Munich, cited by Barruel in his
"Memoirs Explaining the History of Jacobinism.")

On August 9, 1839, Vindice wrote to tell Nubius that he
condemns those individual assassinations blamed, with hateful
cynicism, on the Carbonarios: "We will not individualize crime
simply to propagate it in proportions to love of country and
hatred of the Church. Catholicism does not fear the sharp
dagger as much as the Monarchy; but these (two) foundations of
social order will destroy themselves through moral corruption.
We will never relinquish our efforts to corrupt ... We will
not make martyrs unless we can make it a popular vice among
many peoples. That everyone accepts the vice as part of life;
that they completely absorb it ... making vicious hearts that
cast Catholicism into oblivion. It is this corruption that we
must spread far and wide; corrupting the people and the clergy;
in the end, this corruption will carry the Church to its
grave."

And what were the results obtained by the Occult Powers?
On April 3, 1824, two months after issuing the high command of
the Supreme Court, Nubius wrote: "there are certain members of
the clergy, especially in Rome, who have swallowed the bait,
hook, line and sinker." And on April 3, 1843, still on the
same subject, he wrote: "We must carry on, by whatever means
possible, even though poorly planned, to win our REVOLUTION FOR A POPE."

In 1845, another chief of the Supreme Court made a
proposal concerning the clergyman Gioberti: "The priest
Gioberti talks to the clergymen in their own language and I am
pleased to tell you that we are introducing the doctrines of
liberty and Italian independence everywhere, with the Pope
taking the lead. And we have won over many members of the
clergy, both secular and of orders; they have literally
convinced themselves that Catholicism is essentially a doctrine
of democracy. Each day the party enlists more and more experts
within the clergy. Gioberti's new book, written especially for
priests, is awaited with impatience."

On one hand, Chiefs of the anti-Christian conspiracy
congratulate themselves on the success of their detestable
activities; on the other hand, the Secretary of State at the
Vatican discloses his agonizing fears in a letter dated August
8, 1845: "Our young clergy are already imbued with liberal
doctrines ... they have abandoned their serious studies. Most
of the clergy who will follow us into positions of
responsibility are a thousand times more infected with the
liberal vice ... ; the majority do not recognize the character
or the nature of things that are happening, yet they allow
themselves to be convinced by mere suggestions, wherein the
great crisis of the Church was born. Among ecclesiasticals
everywhere there appears an identical spirit of discord ...
they break away from traditions, converting themselves to
the philosophy of Modernism, substituting love of neighbor, the
spirit of the heresy ... the prideful individual dwelling in
darkness."

The result of Lucifer's plan, (under the names of
"aggiornamente," ecumenism, religious liberty, the conciliar
spirit, the reform of the Church) is occurring everywhere.
Stanislas de Guaita endeavors "to use Christian theology with
its esoteric splendour to transform and enrich church policy
without anyone suspecting it." (Essaid de Sciences Mandites, 1,
Page 159). Roca, an ex-canonist, responded: "My beloved
brother in Jesus Christ, I do not argue with any of your
judgements. We are in agreement on all points of the secret
doctrine" (i.e., according to the writings of Papus),
"introducing our concepts into the teachings that Christ gave
to the twelve and later to the seventy two." "We have no
problems with the Protestant churches; our existing
relationship is the same as that existing between Free Masonry
and the Synagogue; the only problem we have is the opposition
of the Roman Catholic Church" (F. Marsoudon: "Le Temple," Sept.
Oct. 1946, pg. 34).

As we have seen before, Roca foretold liturgical anarchy
under the pretext of restoring the original concepts: "I
believe the divine rites and regulations of the liturgy, the
ceremonies, the rituals and the precepts of the Roman Church
can undergo immediate change, through an Ecumenical Council ...
a transformation, restoring the simplicity of the golden
Apostolic Age, wherein we will adapt it to our state of
conscience and modern worldliness." "Make preparations for the
sacrifice, a properly executed termination ... THE SURRENDER OF
THE PAPACY: to be lost under the sacred rules of the last
Council. The Papal Caesar will be crowned a victim for the
sacrifice." "THE THEOLOGY OF SCIENCE, which the adult
population is eagerly demanding, HAS REPLACED THE MYSTICAL
THEOLOGY." "They are hastening the destruction of the `Summa
Theologica' and substituting the `Scientific Summa'." "A
SUBLIMELY NEW CHRISTIANITY, PROFOUNDLY TOLERANT, TRULY
UNIVERSAL, DOGMATICALLY DEFINED IN ENCYCLOPEDIAL FASHION ... A UNIVERSAL ORDER WHEREIN ALL RELIGIONS CAN IDENTIFY GOD WITH HUMANITY, which, before my very eyes transforms Christ into the entire universe." And Pignatelli, in his "Batailles Maconniques," Pg. 29, wrote: "Only in a theocratic society, having the universal character of FREEMASONRY, will it be
possible someday to unite Islam, Christianity, Judaism,
Buddhism, Europe and Asia under the same ideals and within a
common faith." And the Grand Orient confirms: "FREE MASONRY
WILL BECOME THE SUPERCHURCH; THE CHURCH THAT WILL REUNITE ALL RELIGIONS." (Bulletin of the Grand Orient no. 37, `Politique et Maconnerie'). THE RELIGION THAT WILL BE SUBSTITUTED FOR CHRISTIANITY SHOULD BE AN ORDER WITHIN WHICH ALL RELIGIONS ARE UNITED." We aspire to have no intermediary between God and ourselves. Therefore, it is probable that the future religion will have priests of every faith ... thus, introduction would be through widespread schools of religion and the symbolism will help thinking people to discover those truths hidden deeply within the human soul." "After assimilating Christianity and other current forms of spirituality, the world of the future will be established and, if allowed, principles analogous to the phenomenon of total collectivism will be systematically taught and a form of pantheism will be born,
wherein all the modes of present day thinking will be blended;
united into a new, inconceivable dynamism to achieve their
objectives."

But Roca combined the formative elements of this new
Christianity: "You must have new dogmas; a new religion; a new
ministry, and new rituals that very closely resemble those of
the surrendered Church in the same way that the Catholic Church
adapted from the Mosaic Church, its dead Mother." "Using logic
and knowledge, everyone will become enlightened and the faith
will disappear ... science will rule the world; because it will
be accepted as the same God as humanity." "In this hour, each
of us has a duty to encourage the evolution that will transform
the Papacy, enabling us to put on the armor of new worldly
spirit and scientific rational."

"From the one Universal church, various religions derive
their dogmatic beliefs; they unite their convictions relative
to the existence of a Supreme Being ... a life after death, the
immortality of the soul in the same way that love of neighbor
is proclaimed by all religions as being first among all the
commandments." (World Spiritual Congress, Brussels, 1946).

"THE UNIVERSAL, GOD-LIKE REIGN OF LIBERTY, JUSTICE AND
EQUALITY AS IDEALS OF THE SOCIO-ECONOMICS OF BROTHERHOOD; THIS IS THE SACRED TRINOMIAL ZEALOUSLY PREACHED UNDER THE BANNER OF SINARCHISM" (a 1937 Fascist movement formed in Mexico to establish a totalitarian, clerical state). We would say, this is the rule of Lucifer. Roca proclaimed the "conversion" of the Pope to the new spirit of the world ... after which he (the Pope) directed the Ecumenical Council to restore the simplicity of the Golden Apostolic Age of the Church:" The old Pope (John), having broken the silence, and started the transition of this great religious controversy, goes to his grave. He did his duty as the oracle of Christ ... having confirmed those of
similar religious philosophy: that is to say, those new voices
who will tell the entire Christian community that their
Redeemer has fully accepted it. Science - the sacred one who
enlightens - reigns supreme in the world as modern civilization
... the proclaimed daughter of the church, heir to the promises
of God, our Lord, and the true meaning of the parables.
"Pronouncing his own deposition, the Roman Pope, in a papal
bull, voluntarily disengaged himself from traditional forms of
papal control, declaring fulfillment of his mission as the
originator ... giving broader scope to the predominate business
of the new Pontiff, the new Church and the new ministry he
installed prior to his death ..." "It should be readily seen
by everyone that the new order grew logically out of the old
order ... traditional roles will be consequently transformed
into the new worldly organization by the light of the Gospel."
"This new Church, even though it does not preserve the
scholastic discipline and rudimentary form of the old Church,
will (nevertheless) receive canonical ordination and
jurisdiction from Rome." "It is essential that the liberation
advance itself by the law of Evolution, openingly following the
holy Gospel's divine direction towards development of the new
humanity." Roca pointed out that the Pope, as head of the
Ecumenical Council, would reform the entire Church. "He's a
Pope of Faith and Piety; also a Pope of Gnosis (philosophic
insight) and confidential knowledge." "He must precede someone
who earns the world's admiration and should be a person to whom the world will pay homage in place of their Redeemer. This is a matter of demonstrating PERFECT ACCORD BETWEEN THE IDEOLOGY oF MODERN CIVILIZATION AND THE IDEOLOGY OF CHRIST AND HIS GOSPEL. IT WILL BE THE CONSECRATION OF THE NEW SOCIAL ORDER AND THE SOLEMN BAPTISM OF MODERN CIVILIZATION."

In light of these revelations, we are obligated to study
the outcome of Vatican II Council and the Post-conciliar
Church; we are obligated to see and recognize the existence of
a prefabricated plan, emanating from the Mafia den, partially
realized and expanding to complete fulfillment. Pope Montini's
position appears clear to us ... total accommodation for this
program of the anti-Church. We have ample reason to suspect
that Paul VI could be the Pope of the REVOLUTION.


PAUL VI'S PROGRAMS EARN ALLIANCE WITH COMMUNIST COUNTRIES

Before pursuing the actions of Paul VI at Bogota,
Columbia, it is appropriate to examine the diplomatic
operations of the Vatican with Communist countries. The
developments that we exposed before are being realized with
accelerated speed. We must meet Communism without fear or
doubt; since our encounter with Communism is inevitable, we
must establish a proper posture before it dominates and
enslaves us. Consciously or unconsciously, Pope Montini's
historic mission appears to be that of directing the secret
forces of world revolution. Recalling our earlier comments
about Montinian activities in Columbia, I believe I have
sufficient information to properly appreciate what we saw and
heard in the Post-conciliar Eucharistic Congress following Paul
VI's arrival in Columbia.

After many years, Msgr. Agostino Casaroli, Archbishop of
Cartagine and Secretary of the Church Council of Public
Affairs, offered forgiveness and established an open
communication and active working relationship between the
Vatican and Communist countries of Eastern Europe. Msgr.
Casaroli was preceded by Msgr. Cardinal Koening, Archbishop of
Vienna, in this pastoral activity. Taking the allegiance of
Catholic states (e.g., Spain, Portugal and South American
countries) for granted, the Vatican feigned an "agreeable"
posture while pursuing a policy of disregard in an effort to
break or loosen the concordant bond maintained between these
countries. Meanwhile, with considerable help from the
Judeo-Masonic UNO (United Nations), the Vatican anxiously
cultivated the establishment and extension of diplomatic
relations with countries publicly or secretly dominated by the
"Star of David." Since 1967, through the meeting of minds,
Msgr. Casaroli maintained the relationship between the Vatican
and the government of Poland. Traveling to Belgrade in the
summer of 1970, he spoke with Tito, inviting him to an audience
with Paul VI on his next trip to Rome. Then, accompanied by
Msgr. Silvestrino (Church Council of Public Affairs) and John
Kwaku Nimo (Church Council of the Laity), Msgr. Casaroli flew
to Moscow in a Russian Airlines plane to continue the thawing
process.

According to Vatican sources, Msgr. Casaroli had
previously visited Russia and certain satellite countries on
private matters at various times. On this occasion, however,
his visit to the Kremlin was official ... a high honor for His
Excellency and Pope Paul VI, whom he represented.

At the conclusion of this unexplainable visit (one that
neither Pius XI nor Pius XII would have tolerated), on
Thursday, February 25, 1971, the "Non-Proliferation of Nuclear
Arms Treaty" was signed ... a treaty very similar to those
signed in Washington and London by the Apostolic Delegates,
Msgrs. Raimundi and Enrici. The Vatican, anxious for world
peace and hoping to halt the manufacture of nuclear bombs,
threw the moral weight of its example at other governments
(displaying a war-like posture that endangered world peace) in
an effort to compromise them. The Holy See proposed, as
always, a desire of peace and concord among all men on earth.
Msgr. Casaroli expressed a desire to ease the living conditions
of Catholic citizens within these Communist countries.
Diplomatic experts from the Vatican conversed with high
officials of the Soviet government. On Friday (2/26/71), they
met with Valdimur Kuroyedov, president of the Soviet Union's
Council on Religious Matters (and accessory to the softening up
process), to review the official authorization of the Russian
Orthodox Church in Soviet territories and obtain certain
guarantees with respect to Catholics (always with a basis of
control). Msgr. Casaroli also spoke with Kosures about the
necessary and careful preparation for the Conference of
European Security, conditions in the Middle East and Indochina,
and the disarmament proposal. The Vatican Secretary of Public
Affairs also had an impromptu meeting with Archbishop Pimen
(patriarch of Moscow after Archbishop Alexis' death) and other
authorities of the Orthodox Church.

Thus, thanks to the help of their Jewish and Masonic
allies, the Vatican established diplomatic relations (with
visions of sharing - oh, enlightened dreamer!) with the number
one enemy of the Church, of civilization and humanity and - why
not say God, Himself. A Catholic Archbishop, a Secretary of
one of the many new offices that carry out daily business at
the Vatican (replacing the antiquated Roman Curia), essentially
a Papal Delegate, travels to Moscow ... not in an Italian
plane, but a Russian plane ... and is received by the Kremlin
in the identical manner that Communist leaders have been
officially received at the Vatican. He met and dealt with
supreme heads of the Communist Party; extended the softening
process through controlled circumstances, not only for the few
Catholics still in Russia, but for the many living in satellite
countries. The pretext of signing the Treaty of "Non
Proliferation of Nuclear Arms" was well contrived and what they
spoke about in those secret conferences, God only knows.

Meanwhile, the Communists gained their share. For now,
they escape the penitential sackcloth of Papal condemnation.
The Communists can boast of open-minded Catholics; that the
Church (their Church) is united with Rome who accepts and
respects us in the name of the Gospels; that the Church is
freed from the yoke of slavery, the fearful tyranny of the
Sino-Soviets. Pope Montini continues his program inch by inch.
He knows exactly where he's going and what he wants. He has
the international support of his powerful allies, who already
perceive themselves as masters of the world.

But do not forget: the Communists are intrinsically bad
and everyone who cooperates with them is collaborating with the
anti-church and the unpatriotic (those working against the
public good). Also, the pretext of humanitarian treaties are
not even worth the paper they are written on. PRESENTLY, THE
CHURCH IS DISMANTLING ITSELF WHILE EXPANDING ITS DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS WITH THE COMMUNISTS.


THE WORLD CONFERENCE ... A MESSAGE ON RELIGION AND PEACE

In spite of the liberal reputation the Catholic Church has
acquired under the pastoral control of Paul VI, as new evidence
of ecumenical flexibility we are duplicating the message of 22
principal world-wide religions, dispatched from Kyoto (Japan)
after the World Conference on Religion and Peace. Attended by
more than 1600 delegates and observers (including Dr. Carson
Blake and Msgr. Helder Camara), the president of this unique
and unusual conference was Msgr. Fernandez, Catholic Archbishop
of Delhi (India):

1) This world-wide Conference on religion and peace
represents an effort of all great religions on behalf of
all men and women to establish dialog on the urgent
problem of peace.

2) We are in a crucial period of time. At this very
moment, we are faced with cruel and inhuman wars, racial,
social and economic violence. Man's survival on this
planet is being threatened by nuclear destruction. Man
has already recognized this intolerable condition.

3) Because of our deep convictions as religions of
the world, united in Kyoto from all parts of the globe, we
should he able to render an invaluable service towards the
cause of peace. Bahaists, Buddhists, Confucianists,
Christians, Hindus, Jains, Jews, Mussulmans, Shintoists,
Shiites, Zorastrians and others; all are reunited in peace
through an identical concern for peace.

4) Through common and concerted dialogue in an effort
to make progress on the problems of peace, we have
discovered that that which unites us is more important
than that which separates us.

THE COMMON HERITAGE OF ALL RELIGIONS.

5) Let us compare that which we have in common:

- Our belief in the fundamental unity of the human
race; the equality and dignity of all human beings.

- Our noble conviction concerning the sacred
character of the person and his conscience.

- Our belief that force is no substitute for right;
that the power of man is neither sufficient nor
supreme (free from limitation by other authority);
that love, charity, self-abnegation and the power
of prayer is distinctly superior to the power of
hatred, enmity and self-interest.

- Our deep feeling of obligation to defend the poor
and oppressed against the rich and tyrannical.

- That our innermost hopes will prevail and end
successfully.

6) Regarding these common convictions, we believe
that the singular, most important mission entrusted to all
religious men and women is that they concern themselves,
with all their heart and soul, with peace and
pacification, becoming the servants of peace.

7) As religious men and women, for the sake of our
conscience, we confess (in humility and penitence) that
too often we have betrayed our religious ideals and
obligations towards peace. It is not religion that has
failed the cause of peace, but the religious. This
betrayal of religion must be corrected.

8) Accepting these urgent challenges, we set in
operation the peace movement for the second half of the
twentieth (XX) century. We will study the problems of
disarmament and the development of man's rights. There is
ample evidence that peace is endangered each time the arms
race is increased, by the widening gulf between the rich
and the poor (within nations and among nations), and by
the tragic violation of man's rights throughout the entire
world.

9) After studying the problems of disarmament, we
conclude (and believe) that peace cannot be secured by the
accumulation of arms. Consequently, we are demanding that
immediate measures be taken towards disarmament, affecting
all arms of destruction: conventional, nuclear, chemical
and bacteriological.

THE SCANDAL OF THE DISARMAMENT RACE.

10) We are discovering that the problems of
disarmament are in danger of growing greater due to the
large numbers of employees involved in the research and
fabrication (of arms), and the extremely large
accumulation of arms, representing an outlandish and
scandalous proportion of our human resources. Though we
are completely convinced of this, these resources are
urgently needed to combat the injustice of those that wage
war and other forms of social violence ... all society,
dying like little children, is in a state of war. If this
development, by itself, is not able to attain peace, we
will not have an enduring peace. That is why we
compromised in the use of the United Nations' forces, in
an effort to make the 60's a decade of improvement for all
countries.

11) Social disturbances, so prevalent in the world
today, show that peace depends upon recognition, promotion
and protection of man's rights. Racial discrimination,
repression of ethnic and religious minorities, torture of
political and other prisoners, legalized denial of the
right of political liberty and equal opportunity,
different forms of colonial oppression ... all these
violations of man's rights are responsible for increasing
violence and the degradation of human civilization.

12) Although we speak at this conference in our own
name, as people representing many religions, reunited by
our profound concern for peace, we strive to raise our
voice in favor of the immense majority of the human race
that are deprived of power, whose voice is rarely heard -
the poor, the exploited, the refugees, all who do not have
homes, whose life, properties and liberty have been
devastated by war.

13) We address ourselves to our religions, the
Ecumenical Councils, and all non-sectarian organizations
who fight in favor of peace; to nations (beginning with
our own), the United Nations, the men and women who are
outside the mentioned religions, but occupy themselves
with the well-being of mankind.

14) To each and everyone, beginning with ourselves,
we declare that the start of all serious effort in this
human undertaking - on the educational, cultural,
scientific, social and religious levels - is the solemn
acceptance of the reality that men and all their
activities are forever united into an identical destiny;
we live and die together; we continue towards a common
destruction or, together, we compromise ourselves for the
purpose of peace.
We cannot honestly denounce war and everyone who
befriends or aids those at war, if our own personal lives
are not totally dedicated to peace and we are not disposed
to make the required sacrifices towards this end. We
should do everything within our power to influence and
alert the public conscience, until people willingly align
themselves against war and the fraudulent hope of peace
obtained by military victory.

ALL RELIGIONS SHOULD UNITE IN THE INTEREST OF PEACE.

We are convinced that all religions despite
differences derived from their history, should make an
effort to unite au men in plans to protect the true peace.
We believe we have an obligation, in spite of sectarian
boundaries, to collaborate with those outside of the
historical religions who share our desire for peace.

We are advising friendly nations to pledge themselves
to the principle that establishment and maintenance of
military power leads to disaster. Forceful expressions
renew a climate of fear and distrust; needing the
wherewithal to attend the necessities of health, lodging
and happiness, they aggravate the differences between
nations, establishing military and economic blockades;
they consider peace as an armed truce ... a counterbalance
of fear, upsetting the utopian, universal hope of well
being shared by all humanity. To this we say: "NO."
We urge the United Nations to participate in our
cause of peace. Peace, and maintaining peace, not only
demands that the United Nations exist, but that it be
recognized and given credit and total support in the
application of its decisions. We earnestly appeal to the
United Nations to become a universal representative, more
justly using their power and exercising greater
esponsibility in their actions. We call upon the member
nations that under their direction, they will accept and
resolve problems in a manner able to avoid direct
conflicts.

As men and women of religion, we hope that this
Conference will help us see and accept the responsibility
that suits us in the attainment of a true and lasting
peace. (The Catholic Documentation, February 7, 1971).
Here we have the reply, a worldly and ecumenical
accommodation called "POPULORUM PROGRESSIO" ... the document that Pope Montini considers the greatest work of his Papacy ... that we regard as a cunning and well-documented exposition of the demagogic utopia of Communism sprinkled with holy water.
By participating in this Conference of all religions, the
Catholic Church signified approval and acceptance, leveling all
religions to equality. I consider this as an implicit and
inferred act to cripple our Catholic faith, an acknowledgement
that all religions represent the same thing. The temporal
objective of peace, appearing very attractive to many, can not
become the common denominator that itself collates all beliefs.
The fundamental and essential religion should orient itself to
dutifully recognize obligations toward God and attainment,
after this life, of the true and only happiness for which we
were created. Peace, says St. Augustine, is "an order of
tranquility:" it is not a devotion to order, and cannot be
given to someone by an inversion of the values of life.

This document characterizes the mentality and eagerness of
Pope Montini to balance those elements of patrimony
(traditional values) common to all religions. Not once did he
mention God ... as though God does not count ... he made man
the center, the common denominator of all religions. As though
it's a basic postulate of all religions, he proclaims the
obligation we have of placing ourselves on the side of the poor
and oppressed, and against the rich. Isn't this a declaration
of war against everyone who owns private property? Isn't this
a pretense that goes against the natural and eternal law,
identifying religions with the degrading slavery of atheistic
Communism? The disarmament, with which Paul VI appears to be
preoccupied, is the literal surrender of world liberty,
because, without resistance and identification, equality in
slavery of the people will be realized, under a one-world
government controlled by Communism and international Judaism.

Once again the RIGHTS OF MAN, epitomized in those famous
words of the French Revolution, "LIBERTY, EQUALITY AND
BROTHERHOOD," appear to guarantee mankind a peaceful
co-existence under the impartial rule of the United Nations.
The law and commandments of God no longer count ... they are
discounted: their impracticality has been demonstrated. Now
man (as Paul VI said in his visit to the United Nations) must
turn his hopeful eyes to the paternal and just government of
the international organization, directed and controlled by the
Jewish Mafia. He said the thrust of his Official Communication
was: "to one and all, beginning with ourselves, we declare that
all forces should participate to the highest degree in all
forms of human undertaking - educational, cultural, scientific,
social and religious (religion, last but not least, in the
unchangeable hierarchy of life's values). It is in solemn
acceptance of reality that men and all their activities are now
united into one destiny," under one government with only one
religion (added to complete the Montinian thought). "We are
convinced that religions, in spite of exacting historical
differences (these should not be metaphysical antagonisms
between truth and error), should encourage the union of all men
whose plans favor true peace." We will remove the dogmas,
silence the beliefs, weaken the commandments of Catholic
morality and discipline: we will establish a rite acceptable to
everyone so that we can surrender ourselves in devout reverence
before the Montinian idol of peace. Nevertheless, do not
forget: "Peace and the maintenance of peace not only demands
that we recognize the United Nations, but more importantly, all
our support is offered to them in the application of their
decisions." That is why Cardinal Villot, Paul VI's Secretary
of State, sent a telegram to the Pontiff urging his attendance
at the Manila Meeting, calling it, "A pilgrimage and message of
peace and universal love."

As Abbe George de Nantes explained in his CONTRE REFORME,
January, 1971: "In past months, the Pope, in spoken and written
articles, has delivered a series of very important and
influential messages which is so voluminous that the Christian
people are unable to find time to read the pontifical texts,
comment on them, or even retain them in their memory. All
these texts have the identical purpose: to repeatedly expose in
a persistent manner those terms and articles relating to
today's world and the terrestrial destiny of humanity as
expressed in the CREED OF PAUL VI. Without doubt, this
historical and planetary vision is the Pope's personal dream
... his own thoughts and opinions expressed in the language of
theology. Yet it is presented in the customary manner of a
solemn and infallible act with sovereign authority; an
unprecedented use of influence, because it does not express
defined doctrine, that is doctrine representing the eternal and
universal teachings of the Church (semper et ubique docuit
Ecclesia). But, this is not simply a political or economic
theory of Paul VI; it is a specific religious viewpoint that he
wants to impose as a moral obligation. This idealistic view is
totally interposed in the dominion of faith and morals, whereon
the Pope invokes the Gospel and Christian faith in order to
bring his thinking to the full attention and acceptance of the
faithful. Thus, a serious and undisturbed study of this
theology is advised." It is impractical to repeat Abbe's
excellent analysis, however, I will at least cite the main
principles that his work unfolded:

I. The Ultimate End of History is the complete evolution
and solidarity of the Human Race.

II. The Foundation is: The Declaration of Man's Rights
... LIBERTY, EQUALITY and BROTHERHOOD.

II. A Prior Condition is: radical change: a complete
alteration of humankind.

IV. The Providential Instrument of Salvation is: the
United Nations and their appointed delegates.

V. The Modern Christ is: Service to those who rebel
against hypocrisy and injustice.

[Guelfo Nero]

I frutti dell'opera di Padre Saenz: dall'Unione cattolica "Trento" alla Società sacerdotale "Trento"


ANTECEDENTS
The Vatican II Council had just been concluded when, among those who truly knew and loved the Church, there occurred a situation of dereliction, confusion and perplexity--but soon reactions rose up all over the world. Voices, such as that of His Eminence Card. Ottaviani, who condemned the New Mass; or such as in France, where Archbp. Marcel Lefebvre, who in spite of his intense work in defense of the true Faith, nevertheless, never came to question the legitimacy of the last popes; equally in Germany there appeared the group UNA VOCE; in Mexico, the CATHOLIC UNION OF TRENT was organized, to mention just a few, as it would be practically impossible to mention the long list of groups, priests and zealous lay people who raised their voices of condemnation in the whole world.

It was during the 70's when some priests and fervent lay people, sustaining the sedevacantist thesis, got together to defend the Catholic Faith in Mexico, founding the CATHOLIC UNION OF TRENT. Here we find the very wise doctor and priest, Father Joaquin Saenz y Arriaga, S.J., and the very zealous priest and later bishop, Msgr. Moises Carmona. Both developed an intense labor of reconquering the former by means of his numerous books, among which shine out 'THE NEW MONTINIAN CHURCH' and 'SEDE VACANTE', that circulate throughout the whole world; the latter, by means of his numerous writings and letters to combat error and defend the Faith, directed to Modernist Bishops and Priests, besides his untiring efforts to conquer towns and take back from the Postconciliar Church various churches and communities .

Father Saenz died on April 28, 1976. In his spiritual legacy we read: 'My life and all that is most precious to me I have sacrificed for Christ, for the Church, and for the Papacy...' and later added: 'May the last cry of my soul be that of our Mexican martyrs; Long live Christ the King! Long live the Virgin of Guadalupe.'

Father Carmona, on account of the worthless excommunication that Cardinal Miranda cast against Father Saenz, wrote the following words in a fervent letter: 'They excommunicated you for your fidelity to Christ, His teachings and His Church. Blessed excommunication! As long as it be for this reason, may all excommunications come upon me'.

Thus would Father Moises Carmona continue the battle for the Church at the head of the Catholic Union of Trent. In 1981 he was invited to Germany by the group UNA VOCE to talk about the possibility of his being consecrated.

EPISCOPAL CONSECRATION OF BISHOP MOISES CARMONA
On October 17 of this same year he was consecrated a Bishop in the city of Toulon, France, by His Excellency Petrus Martinus Ngo Dhin Thuc, Archbishop of Hue.

Now as Bishop the first preoccupation of Msgr Carmona was the creation of a seminary. A first intent was made in the city of Rochester, N.Y. in the U.S. where some seminarians were sent, directed by Bishop Vezelis, but the difficulties that were presented by way of language and other causes brought about the frustration of this first intent .

At this time priests were lacking, the field of work of Bishop Carmona was very vast. It was until Feb. 7, 1983 that Bishop Carmona would visit Hermosillo for the first time, a city situated in northwest Mexico, when the priestly zeal and unction that Bishop Carmona reflected enormously awoke the fervor of that community and the vocation of several young men.

FOUNDATION OF THE SEMINARY OF THE SACRED HEARTS OF JESUS AND MARY
By 1985, five enthusiastic young men had reunited in Hermosillo, Sonora with the intention of carrying out their vocation. Although there was nowhere to send them and in spite of the humble house in which they were living, they applied themselves to religious studies and to prayer in common.

A petition on the part of several generous lay people in Hermosillo suggested to Bishop Carmona the creation of a seminary, to which he gladly acceded: By that time John of God Machain had joined them, an ex-monk from the Benedictine Abbey of Brussels, Belgium and ex-seminarian and disciple of the illustrious Archbp. of Hermosillo, Juan Navarrete.

Thanks to the experience of John of God Machain programs of study were elaborated and discipline established as it should be. Thus was the Seminary inaugurated on Sept. 6th, 1986.

In February of 1987, Bishop Carmona visited the Seminary of the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary which he blessed, and also conferred Holy Orders on Fr. John of God Machain. At this time there were 6 seminarians who had come from the states of Chihuahua and Sonora. These first students who in their majority embraced the priesthood afterwards were: Eduardo Mariscall, Enrique López Vazquez, Jose Isabel Robles, Martin Davila Gandara, David Contreras, and Daniel Perez Gómez. The first two did not pursue their studies, but the other four would be converted into the foundation of the seminary from which the Priestly Society of Trent would later be organized.

The Seminary continued to grow with many difficulties, At the same time Bishop Carmona continued his untiring labor of the conquest of new communities. One of them being the Parish of St. James the Apostle in the town of Dos Caminos, Guerrero, with approximately 1000 parishioners.

GROWTH
In June of 1987 Bishop Carmona ordained Gerardo Solis and Alfredo Adame, whom he himself had formed, In July of the same year he ordained Fr. Jose Isabel Robles in Hermosillo, who would be at his side until the Bishops death.

At this time other priests joined who were to cause much damage to our community and who later on separated themselves from us. One example is Fr. Manuel Ojeda, who betrayed Bishop Carmona and took over almost all the communities and towns of natives of the mountains of Guerrero.

But the untiring battle spirit of Bishop Carmona drove him to found new communities that were added to his apostolic zeal. These communities are found in the states of Chihuahua, Coahuila, Durango, Veracruz, Moreos and State of Mexico.

In June of 1989 Fr. Martin Davila and Fr. David Contreras were ordained. In April of 1991 it was Daniel Perez Gomez turn to be ordained along with whom were ordained another two priests for the Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen in the U.S., and whose Superior was at that time Fr. Tarcisius, who on the 24th of Sept, of that same year would receive the Episcopal Consecration in the city of Spokane. Washington and whom we now know as Bishop Pivarunas. It is well to bring out that strong ties of unity were established with this Religious Congregation that had priests in various parts of the U.S, and Canada.

EPISCOPAL CONSECRATION OF BISHOP PIVARUNAS
The Consecration of Bishop Pivarunas was an event more than providential of the Divine Wisdom since a few weeks later, the untiring Bishop Moises Carmona was to deliver his soul to Our Lord, having died in a car accident after returning from one of the missions that he carried out in his extensive labor.

CONSTITUTION OF THE SOCIETY OF TRENT

Immediately after this lamentable event, Fr. Jose Isabel Robles was named Superior in interim form. Nevertheless, the death of Bishop Carmona revealed even more the need of organizing and founding a Society to preserve unity among us and to sustain that form of labor we inherited from Bishop Carmona.

In 1993 the Priestly Society of Trent was founded, not in a canonical form, since in the actuality this is impossible due to the veritable chaos being lived in the Church in which we cannot speak of a legitimate authority nor jurisdiction.

We founded ourselves as best we could with a Superior just like all Societies although not possessing either approbation nor canonical title, but only the priesthood and the election freely made of all the associated priests.

From that moment we had a great challenge. The work that God commended to us seemed too much for us. We were only seven priests and very young. Bishop Carmona left a great void, and a great responsibility for us. Many Modernists and pseudo-Traditionalists infiltrated in the Church thought that the Priestly Society of Trent would be a failure. There was only one thing favoring us.- it was the confidence and security that God had destined us for this and that He would be with us in order to communicate all the graces and necessary help to continue His work here in Mexico.

The example of Bishop Carmona encouraged us enormously. We felt the pride of having received his schooling. All this made us ignore the criticism and snares of our enemies, by which we lost just about all of our benefactors and help that Bishop Carmona had.

THE PRIESTLY SOCIETY OF TRENT IS CONSOLIDATED AND ITS OBJECTIVES ARE SET

But we moved forward. How could we abandon so many souls confided to us by God? We began to reunite periodically. We set the principal objectives towards which we had to direct all our works. It is well to say here that we could always count on the support of Bishop Mark Anthony Pivarunas, above all with sacramental assistance. Thus then, would our principal objectives be in order of importance:
1) The consolidation of our Seminary and foundation of a minor seminary
2) The foundation of Convents.
3) The foundation of schools and parallel to all this, the conquest of new communities and construction of churches.


Father Daniel Perez Gomez

[Guelfo Nero]

Primero, a la ambigüedad de la mencionada Declaración, la misma está llena de sofismas, y por medio de ellos trata de compaginar enseñanzas de la Iglesia Católica con errores ya condenados anteriormente por el magisterio de la Iglesia, emanados de decretos y encíclicas del Vaticano II, Pablo VI y Juan Pablo II.

Segundo, aunque fuera ortodoxa toda la Declaración Dominus Iesus, en esto se les reconocería dicha verdad, claro que esto no significa que sean la verdadera Iglesia Católica, ya que todavía mantienen doctrinas erróneas que la descalifican, tales como la libertad religiosa, el antropocentrismo y el seguir manteniendo la falsa misa, esto por mencionar algunas.

En tercer lugar; con la salida a la luz de esta Declaración, Dominus Jesus, inmediatamente se nota el divisionismo imperante en la nueva Iglesia, debido a la inconformidad de un número considerable de Obispos y Prelados de la misma, que no están de acuerdo con este documento, cabe mencionar que esta división no es nueva, sino que se viene dando desde la fundación de esta Iglesia en el Concilio Vaticano II; división que se da no sólo en cuanto a la doctrina, sino también en el culto.

En esta mencionada Declaración, que he revisado de una manera exhaustiva prácticamente, no encuentro aquellas frases de alarma de ciertos medios de comunicación, tanto impresos, como electrónicos, 'Como que la Iglesia con esta Declaración volvió a los tiempos de antes', 'O decir, que la Iglesia está retrocediendo por volver a afirmar que fuera de la Iglesia no hay salvación', alarmados estos medios; dicen que esto romperá la comunicación y el diálogo con las otras religiones.

Repito, revisando este documento, lo único que encuentro son afirmaciones ortodoxas de verdades dogmáticas de la Iglesia Católica, y aún en éstas, metiendo términos ambiguos como el 'logos', 'unicidad', y por medio de éstos tratar de compaginarla verdad revelada con los errores de los documentos del Vaticano ll, Pablo VI y Juan Pablo ll, y con ello tratar de justificar el falso Ecumenismo o unidad de la Iglesia del Vaticano II con las otras religiones tanto de índole cristiano, o no cristiano.

En el término 'logos' - tiene los siguientes significados 1) sustancia o causa del mundo; 2) persona divina. La primera definición fue defendida por Heraclio. El logos es entendido por los estoicos y Plotino como principio formador del mundo y como destino, el 'logos' en este sentido es el propio intelecto divino como ordenador del mundo: 'De la inteligencia emana el 'logos', y emana siempre, a tal punto que el intelecto está presente en todos los seres'.

Esta concepción ha servido de modelo a todas las formas del panteísmo moderno. Para los gnósticos el 'logos' es el último de Eones y, por hallarse más cercano al mundo está destinado a formarlo. Orígenes dice, el 'logos' es coeterno con el Padre, el cual no sería tal si no generase al Hijo, pero no es eterno en el mismo sentido. Dios es la vida y el Hijo recibe la vida del Padre. El Padre es el Dios y el Hijo es Dios; los concilios de la Iglesia siempre se han pronunciado contra esta interpretación, que ha sido base para tentativas de herejías.

Nos preguntamos .Por qué utilizar un término equívoco que se presta a caer en ambigüedad y por ende hasta en herejía, como es el término de 'logos' para mencionar al Hijo de Dios, en vez de un término correcto como es el de 'Verbo'?.

Sobre la unicidad, o unidad, este término es utilizado como atributo de Dios para designar que Dios es uno, único, de ser varios dioses, se distinguirían o por una perfección o por una imperfección. En ambos, el que careciera de la imperfección o tuviese la imperfección, no sería infinitamente perfecto ni por ende Dios. O sobre la 'unidad' de la Iglesia como nota característica de la verdadera Iglesia de Jesucristo; el hablar, como ya mencionamos, de unidad de Dios o de su Iglesia, esto no indica que se deba utilizar el mismo término para compaginar o aglutinar todas las religiones o iglesias en una, no importando las doctrinas, aunque contradictorias, de otras religiones con la Iglesia católica.

Como hemos visto, esta Declaración está plagada de términos ambiguos, como por ejemplo el logos, unicidad, inaferrabilidad, y otros términos parecidos que lo único que hacen es confundir, esto aunado con el afán por justificar las doctrinas erróneas, del Vaticano II, Pablo VI y Juan Pablo II, mismas que nos llevan a un falso Ecumenismo, ya condenado por el Magisterio de la Iglesia.

Analizando todo esto me pregunto: .Por qué ese afán de confundir? .Por qué condenar supuestamente el relativismo religioso y a la vez caer en el mismo? .Cuál es la intención al hacer todo esto?

Ahora bien, a nosotros, los de la Verdadera Iglesia Católica, no nos deben interesar de los teatros y faramallas de las declaraciones y documentos de la Iglesia del Vaticano II, ya que estaríamos perdiendo el tiempo en tratar de descifrar las ambigüedades y sofismas propios del Modernismo Religioso imperante en la nueva Iglesia nacida en el concilio Vaticano II.

Por último, ya en la conferencia que di acerca del verdadero y falso Ecumenismo, pongo todos los documentos probatorios, de la falsedad primero de la Iglesia Modernista del Vaticano II, y luego la del Ecumenismo promovido por esta misma.

Sinceramente en Cristo,

Mons. Martín Dávila G.

Pubblicato su 'Trento'
Año 3 No. 9
Diciembre 2000 / Enero 2001

[Guelfo Nero]

Estratto da "LA NUEVA IGLESIA MONTINIANA", Editores Asociados, S. de R. L., seconda edizione, pp. 322-340.

EL AMULETO DE PABLO VI Y SUS IMPLICANCIAS
EN RELACIÓN CON EL JUDAÍSMO

Padre Dr. Joaquín Sáenz y Arriaga

En su "CONTRA-REFORMA", el Abbé Georges de Nantes publicó, en el número de noviembre de 1970, un artículo de gran impacto en toda Europa, titulado "EL AMULETO DEL PAPA". De este artículo me permito transcribir lo siguiente:

"En el PARIS MATCH del 29 de agosto 1970, en el artículo de Robert Serrou 'El próximo Papa será un francés', aparece una ilustración de una gran fotografía del Papa y del Cardenal Villot. Observé esos dos rostros herméticos, en los que se oculta el destino de la Iglesia... Pero, ¿qué es eso, que se descubre sobre el pecho de Paulo VI, encima de su Cruz pectoral? Una curiosa joya, que, me parece, no haber visto nunca a ningún Papa. El objeto debe ser de oro, cuadrado, adornado con doce piedras preciosas, dispuestas en cuatro hileras, tres por tres. Aparece suspendido, en forma muy peculiar, por un cordón, que se añade alrededor del cuello a aquel otro del que pende la Cruz de Cristo.

"Siento miedo de comprender. Sin embargo, no cabe duda alguna. Para describir el objeto, he empleado las mismas palabras, que en el capítulo XXVIII del Exodo, describen el EFOD DEL GRAN SACERDOTE JUDÍO. He aquí, pues, sobre el corazón del Papa, atado a su cuello, el 'Pectoral del Juicio', que el Sumo Sacerdote Aaraon y sus sucesores debieron llevar como ornamento ritual, y sobre las doce piedras del cual estaban inscritos los nombres de las doce tribus de Israel, "para evocar continuamente su recuerdo en presencia de Yahveh". (Ex. XXVIII, 29). Paulo VI lleva la Insignia de Caifás.

¿Quién sabe cuándo, por qué y de quién la ha recibido? ¿Quiere el Papa significar con ello que es el heredero directo del Sacerdote Levítico, como Pontífice de la Iglesia Católica convertido en el nuevo y único Israel de Dios? o ¿es caso que prepara una restauración del judaísmo, como religión del monoteísmo puro, del Libro más sagrado, de la Alianza universal?

"En el Katholikentang (las fiestas anuales de la Alemania Católica) se ha desarrollado este año un culto judío sabático, y en Bruselas, el Cardenal Suenens ha anunciado un próximo CONCILIO, que él llamó CONCILIO DE RECONCILIACIÓN, que tendrá lugar en Jerusalén. y recordemos que la B'nai B'rith y los francmasones sueñan igualmente en la construcción de un 'TEMPLO DE LA COMPRENSIÓN', en la Ciudad Santa, semejante al que ya existe en Nueva York. Una maqueta de ese futuro Templo fue ofrecido al Papa hace ya tiempo, como signo de amplio ECUMENISMO. ¡Todo converge!

"¿Quién nos informará a nosotros, soldados de fila, sobre ese 'Pectoral' y sobre tantos otros puntos oscuros, que encierran designios tenebrosos? ¿Quién tiene, entre nosotros, derecho a saber si el Papa, al revestirse con el 'Efod' de Caifás, pretende asumir el antiguo rito judío, sin temor del Israel, según la carne, o si tiene el proyecto de conducir las iglesias cristianas al 'judaísmo universal' y de restaurar en Jerusalén el Sacerdocio Levítico? Ambigüedad de la mirada y del gesto, de los discursos y del 'amuleto'... Hasta este día, el Crucifijo no había compartido su puesto con ningún otro signo ritual. ¿Será que pronto, sin -ruido, sin palabras, va a desaparecer de sobre el corazón del Papa? Será entonces, cuando en el Vaticano cantará el gallo por última vez...

"¿Qué sabemos nosotros? Nosotros, rebaño católico, nada sabemos de los lejanos proyectos de nuestros Pastores...
Georges de Nantes.



El servicio que el Abbé de Nantes ha prestado a la Iglesia en publicar lo que ya se murmuraba en los corrillos eclesiales, con gran escándalo y con extraordinaria sorpresa, acerca de esa insignia ritual, propia del Gran Sacerdote Levítico, que, desde su viaje a Tierra Santa, aparece en casi todas las fotografías de Paulo VI, es, a no dudarlo, un servicio extraordinario, cuya importancia, tal vez, todavía no podemos ni prever, ni mucho menos precisar. Quizá en esta señal encontremos la clave para explicarnos toda esa subversión en la Iglesia de Cristo, esa que el mismo Papa Montini llamó la "autodemolición" del cristianismo. En Roma, el BORGHESE, revista de gran circulación, en su número del 18 de noviembre de 1970, pág. 603, publicó un sensacional arículo, con estos títulos llamatívos: "El Portón de Bronce". "PAULO VI: ¿PAPA O 'GRAN SACERDOTE'?":

Vaticano, noviembre. - "La impresión en el Vaticano ha sido enorme, casi un choque. Los rumores circulaban hacía tiempo, en los corrillos vaticanos, sin que hubiera nadie que se atreviese a denunciar el hecho. Así las cosas, ha poco tiempo, el Abbé Georges de Nantes difundió la noticia de que el Pontífice Máximo de la Iglesia Católica, Apostólica y Romana lleva en algunas ocasiones sobre la muceta y con la Cruz pectoral la insignia del "GRAN SACERDOTE HEBREO" Caifás. El eco de esta noticia ha sido enorme detrás del Portón de Bronce.
"Y, sin embargo, no cabe la menor duda: la forma, el color, el ornato de esa insignia corresponde a la descripción dada en el Libro de los Libros. Ningún Papa, en los dos mil años anteriores, había llevado una joya, como esa, minuciosamente descrita en el capítulo XXVIII del Exodo, uno de los libros de la Biblia. Juan Bautista Montini sí la lleva. Y ¿por qué? Nadie se atreve a decir los oscuros motivos, que han dado base a esta decisión, pero todos están de acuerdo en afirmar la posibilidad de un intencional equívoco de parte del Pontífice. El objeto, de oro puro, es cuadrado, adornado con doce piedras preciosas, dispuestas en cuatro hileras, de tres en tres, suspendido del cuello de modo muy particular, gracias a un cordón también aureo, hecho de anillos entrelazados que terminan en una borla. Las doce piedras preciosas son de diverso color.
"En suma, se trata, hablando con toda propiedad, del 'EFOD DEL GRAN SACERDOTE HEBREO, conocido como el "PECTORAL DEL JUICIO", que Aaraón y sus sucesores debían llevar como ornamento ritual, y cuyas piedras preciosas corresponden a las doce tribus de Israel. La descripción de este objeto singular está contenida en el Exodo... Exactamente, como se puede ver hoy, en muchas fotografías de Paulo VI...
"Mas, ¿desde cuándo aparece esta increíble unión de la Cruz pectoral con la 'insignia' del Gran Sacerdote Hebreo? Para responder a esta pregunta, hemos examinado centenares de fotografías; así hemos podido precisar que la primera aparición de este extraño 'amuleto' sobre el pecho del Papa romano data, por lo menos, de 1964, es decir, unos meses después de su visita a Palestina. Parece lógico deducir que el ornamento ritual, de que tratamos, le fue dado en esas circunstancias, ya que Paulo VI estuvo también en territorio de Israel.
"No se trata de un caso aislado, de una alucinación. El emblema del 'GRAN SACERDOTE LEVITICO' es visible, claramente visible, sobre todo cuando Paulo VI usa la 'muceta', es decir, esa especie de manteleta roja bordada de armiño blanco; en esas ocasiones, en las fotografías, no se ve muchas veces la Cruz pectoral, por las manos juntas con que el Papa parece encubrirla; pero siempre aparece la insignia de Aaraón, porque está unida a un amplio cordón de oro. Sólo en una ocasión el extraño emblema cuelga sobre el hábito blanco de Paulo VI, sin la 'muceta'. Fue cuando el Pontífice romano estuvo en la India y los fotógrafos le sorprendieron seguido y rodeado de niños hindúes.
"En las diversas fotografías, tomadas durante las visitas de Paulo VI a los lugares santos de la cristiandad, en los varios Santuarios, el "Efod" es siempre visible: así, por ejemplo, con ocasión de su viaje a Fumone, cuando quiso visitar la tumba del Papa Celestino V, la tumba del 'gran refugiado'; en Santa Sabina, en el Aventino el miércoles de ceniza, cuando se cantaron las letanías de los Santos, innovadas por la liturgia bugniniana, que ahora comienzan con un 'Sancte Abraham'...; en la Plaza de España, en el homenaje a la Inmaculada; en Santa Inés; en Santa María del Transtévere, y así en otros casos, en los que el Papa lleva esta insignia ritual, es algo raro, por lo menos, si no sospechoso, y que origina dudas que están exigiendo una respuesta distinta de la que estamos acostumbrados a recibir, del silencio equívoco.
¿Estamos, pues, delante de un hecho masónico o delante de un oscuro designio? Es necesario que alguien esclarezca qué significa todo esto. Porque, en verdad, es desconcertante el hecho de que al lado o en lugar de la Cruz pectoral del Sucesor de Pedro (que todavía y no obstante la contestación de los nuevos teólogos es el Vicario de Cristo) aparezca sobre el pecho del Romano Pontífice un emblema que no es cristiano y que por ser tan rico está en contradicción con los postulados de la "Iglesia de los Pobres".


No sabemos qué explicación pueda darse a ese objeto ritual del gran sacerdote levítico, usado ahora por Paulo VI, el Pontífice Máximo de la Iglesia Católica. La primera explicación, que benignamente insinúa el Abbé de Nantes, no parece ser muy convincente, porque no puede ser admitida. Entre el judaísmo, religión de la promesa y catolicismo, religión. del cumplimiento de esa promesa, no hay propiamente una continuidad, porque el judaísmo actual niega contumazmente el cumplimiento de las divinas promesas en el advenimiento del Cristo prometido; Jesús, el Hijo de Dios y el Hijo de María. El judaísmo, religión actual, niega los dos dogmas fundamentales de nuestra religión, el misterio de la Santísima Trinidad y el misterio de la Encarnación. ¿Cómo es posible que se quiera unir la religión judaica con el verdadero cristianismo basado en esos dos dogmas fundamentales? La promesa, la preparación perdieron su razón de ser, al venir Cristo y todo el judaísmo religión perdió su legitimidad, al fundar Jesucristo su Iglesia, el nuevo Israel, no el Israel según la carne, sino el Israel según el espíritu.

Ahora bien, el "efod" era una insignia eminentemente judaica, que simbólicamente representaba en las funciones rituales del judaísmo religión a las doce tribus de Israel, el Israel según la carne. No hay, pues, nada que justifique el uso de ese objeto ritual en un Papa, que es cabeza visible del nuevo pueblo de Dios, de los hijos de la nueva Alianza. Ya el hecho cierto de que ningún Papa, en los 2000 años de historia de la Iglesia haya usado ese objeto ritual del judaísmo religión, parece demostramos que hay una absoluta incompatibilidad entre la profesión de nuestra fe católica y el uso del "efod" y del "pectoral del juicio", descritos minuciosamente en el Exodo, como propios y exclusivos del "Gran Sacerdote Levítico".

Al usarlo públicamente Paulo VI, tenemos derecho y aún obligación grave en conciencia de investigar el por qué de esa decisión pontificia. Con razón el Abbé de Nantes sentía miedo al comprender o vislumbrar siquiera la única explicación satisfactoria, que, por otra parte, está en perfecta coherencia y armonía con otros hechos inexplicables del Papa Montini, con todo su paradójico pontificado y con toda esa subversión y autodemolición que vemos en la Iglesia. Juan Bautista Montini usa el "efod", porque en su corazón más que Papa, es un "Gran Sacerdote Levítico". Consciente o inconscientemente -Dios todo lo sabe- el parece asociado con el judaísmo internacional, con sus poderosos dirigentes, con sus instrumentos destructores, el comunismo y la masonería. Por otra parte, en su ascendencia genealógica encontramos raíces ciertas de su origen judío, así como en otros de los cardenales y monseñores y teólogos que han planeado esta espantosa revolución en la Iglesia de Dios. Sí, yo denuncio al judaísmo como la causa activa y eficacísima que, con sus inmensos recursos, ha preparado esta tragedia, que no solamente ha afectado a la Iglesia y a las almas, sino a los Estados y a los pueblos, sembrando la confusión, la inconformidad, la lucha de clases, las guerras intestinas y las guerras internacionales, que han cubierto de sangre y de dolor al mundo entero.

Duele en el alma tener que llegar a estas conclusiones; pero hay un dilema ineludible, en el que tenemos que escoger: o salvamos la Iglesia o nos obstinamos en seguir defendiendo obstinadamente a dos Papas y un Concilio, que han venido a romper la unidad de la Iglesia.

En el artículo de LOOK al que nos referimos antes, Roddy dice: "EL DESCUBRIR ESTAS CONFERENCIAS SECRETAS EN LA CIMA HIZO QUE LOS CONSERVADORES EMPEZASEN A SEÑALAR A LOS JUDÍOS NORTEAMERICANOS COMO EL NUEVO PODER DETRÁS DE LA IGLESIA". Y tenían razón los conservadores que desde entonces empezaron a sospechar una inmensa y universal infiltración en todos los organismos de la Iglesia, de judíos, de masones, de comunistas, de falsos hermanos, que entraron en los seminarios, noviciados y organismos católicos, con la consigna y los compromisos de procurar escalar discretamente los puestos de comando, para dirigir, desde esos puestos, la revolución interna, que había sido planeada en los antros tenebrosos de la conspiración judeo-masónica-comunista. ¿Hechos? ¿pruebas? Sobran para los que no se obstinan en negarlos.

Tenemos, en primer término, el muy conocido caso del P. Tondi, S. J., que, siendo miembro activo del Partido Comunista Italiano en su juventud, fue seleccionado por los dirigentes del Partido para hacer esta labor de infiltración activa en la Compañía de Jesús. El cripto-comunista pasó con tal éxito todas las pruebas de su formación jesuítica e hizo tan felizmente sus estudios, que, al terminar su tercera probación -el último reto que que la Compañía da a sus operarios-, fue elegido por los superiores al cargo de tanta responsabilidad de Prefecto de Estudios de la Pontificia Universidad Gregoriana, el centro filosófico y teológico más importante de los jesuitas y quizá también de la Iglesia. En ese puesto importantísimo, el oculto comunista, siguiendo ¡lealmente las directivas secretas de sus verdaderas jerarquías, inició y desarrolló felizmente la revolución ideológica, que, más adelante, habria de corromper el pensamiento teológico-filosófico de ese tan importante Centro del saber. Al fin, se descubrieron las conexiones ocultas del jesuita con los altos dirigentes del Comunismo Italiano e Internacional.

En otra parte de su comentado artículo, Joseph Roddy escribe estas palabras reveladoras: "Una agencia publicitaria, suficientemente cercana al Vaticano para obtener la dirección en Roma de los 2.200 Cardenales y Obispos que de afuera habían acudido al Concilio, entregó a cada uno de ellos un libro de 900 páginas 'Il Complotto contra la Chiesa' (Complot contra la Iglesia). Entre las infamatorias páginas del libro, HABÍA ALGUNOS VESTIGIOS DE VERDAD. La afirmación, que dicho libro hace, de que la Iglesia había sido infiltrada por los judíos, era una intriga eficaz para los antisemitas; PERO ES UN HECHO INNEGABLE QUE MUCHOS JUDÍOS, ORDENADOS DE SACERDOTES, ESTABAN TRABAJANDO EN ROMA ESA DECLARACIÓN EN FAVOR DE LOS JUDÍOS. Entre ellos estaba el P. Baum, como también Monseñor Juan Oesterreicher, miembros del Secretariado de Bea. Y el mismo Cardenal Bea, según el Diario del Cairo 'Al Gornhuria' era un judío llamado Bejar".

Ante la evidencia de los hechos, la judería internacional y su vocero Roddy no pueden negar el hecho palpable de la infiltración, aunque, como es natural, se guardan mucho de darnos todos los nombres de los infiltrados.

Bea, Baum, Oesterreicher son tan sólo unos nombres, a los que podriamos añadir otros de crípto-judíos, cripto-masones y cripto-comunistas, hábilmente infiltrados en la Iglesia, que, hace ya tiempo, fueron preparando la subversión presente, y lograron escalar los altos puestos, para hacer su acción más eficaz. Con su capacidad personal -los escogidos para esta trascendente labor debían estar dotados con aptitudes optimas-, con la influencia de las altas jerarquías, oportunamente trabajadas, por su aparente entrega, sus oportunas adulaciones y sus bien administrados obsequios, debían los escogidos ganarse la confianza y alcanzar así sus progresivos ascensos. En la intriga, la falsedad y la destreza para la infiltración, los judíos sólo son superados por el diablo. Y, en esta intriga, la mafia judia contó con valiosos instrumentos, no judíos, sino católicos, como el R.P. Thimothy Fitzharris O'Boyle, S. J., quien, instalado en el Instituto Bíblico, protegido por la sombra tutelar del valiosísimo Cardenal Bea, miembro, por otra parte, de la ínclita Compañía de Jesús, pudo servir de enlace de información entre todos los que estaban comprometidos en la infiltración masiva de la Iglesia.

Como se desprende del artículo de Roddy, el judaísmo puso en juego toda su táctica, todos sus más valiosos elementos, todos sus inmensos recursos económicos, para asegurar el golpe definitivo, que ellos querían descargar contra el cristianismo, para poder después dedicarse, sin enemigo de importancia al frente, a realizar los sueños de su "mesianismo materialista" en el gobierno del mundo y en el establecimiento del sincretismo religioso, que eliminase para siempre todo vestigio de Cristo y de su religión. La labor fue lenta, discreta y, a no dudarlo, de éxitos progresivos y sorprendentes. No creo posible, para los no judíos, el llegar nunca a investigar todos los secretos de esta secular conspiración. Por eso esta confesión de parte de Mr. Roddy, aunque incompleta, tiene un valor excepcional, que parece indicarnos el por qué Paulo VI usa el "efod" del Gran Sacerdote Levítico.

La famosa "apertura" hacia la izquierda del Pontífice de la Tolerancia no sólo había abierto el "diálogo salvífico" con los "hermanos separados", que jamás han pensado en convertirse a nuestra religión, con los "comunistas", con los que él soñaba establecer "una coexistencia pacífica y mutuamente comprensiva", sino también con los judíos, que ya no tan invisiblemente estaban dirigiendo la subversión, sin que el bondadoso Papa se diese cuenta de la tremenda conspiración, que amenazaba la vida misma de la Iglesia. Juan XXIII, el Papa de la Tolerancia, no sólo había recibido al yerno de Krushev, sino que había establecido, como nos dice Roddy, un gran diálogo con el Comité Judío-Americano, con la Liga Anti-Difamatoria de la B'nai B'rith y con otros organismos judaicos. La conspiración estaba en marcha y contaba con la ayuda de prominentes eclesiásticos, infiltrados oportunamente en la Iglesia Católica, entre los cuales destacaba la figura del Cardenal Agustín Bea, S. J., la figura gris del Vaticano en estos años de transición y de Concilio.

"Aunque Mateo, Marcos, Lucas y Juan hayan sido mejores evangelistas que historiadores -escribe Roddy- sus escritos, según el dogma católico, fueron divinamente inspirados, y alterarlos sería tan imposible, por lo tanto, como cambiar el centro del sol". Con verdadera insensatez el escritor judío pretende negar la historicidad de los Santos Evangelios, para eliminar así su testimonio sobre la responsabilidad colectiva del pueblo de Israel, en la pasión y muerte de Jesús; pero, no por eso deja de reconocer lo que los "expertos' del Cardenal Bea olvidaron, la inspiración divina del texto sagrado, que garantiza el testimonio histórico y de fe de los evangelistas. Sí; alterar los evangelios, aunque sea so pretexto de ecumenismo, es naufragar en la fe. Y en la inviolabilidad de la Sagrada Escritura está la inconsistencia y la equívoca posición de la célebre declaración del Vaticano II sobre los judíos.

Sorprende grandemente, al que con detención lee el artículo de Roddy, la multitud de judíos, que, durante el Concilio, estuvieron trabajando en favor de la famosa declaración conciliar de su exoneración de toda responsabilidad en la pasión y muerte del Señor. El Comité Judío Americano, la B'nai B'rith, el Congreso Mundial. Judío, la Anti-Dífamation Ligue, etc., etc. Aparentemente, las cosas no marchaban muy bien en Roma, donde Shuster llenaba las páginas del "New York Times", el diario judío de más circulación en el mundo, para preparar la opiníón pública. Fritz Becker, del Congreso Mundial Judío, escribió por esos días: "Nosotros no tenemos los mismos puntos de vista de los Nortemericanos, para pretender llevarlos a la imprenta". Como si dijera: "debemos obrar con más discreción". Sin embargo, el Vaticano empezó a ver con buenos ojos el que estos temas se llevasen a la prensa, ya que el viaje de Paulo VI a Tierra Santa acababa de ocurrir, y era necesario desviar la opinión pública de los verdaderos objetivos del Pontífice. Escribe Roddy: "Un experto en relaciones públicas hubiera dicho que la Santa Sede -no la Santa Sede, sino Paulo VI- se había mostrado poco experta en Tierra Santa. Cuando Paulo oró al lado del Patriarca barbado ortodoxo Atenágoras en el sector de Jordania, la visita pareció muy bien. Pero, cuando entró en Israel, tuvo palabras tajantes para el autor del "Vicario" (la obra difamatoria de un judío contra Pío XII) y un discurso encaminado a la conversión de los judíos. Su visita fue tan corta que ni siquiera llegó a mencionar públicamente al joven país que estaba visitando".

Era necesario disimular diplomáticamente, con el velo de una piadosa peregrinación, los pasos de Paulo VI, cuyos objetivos en ese viaje no debían ser entonces conocidos. Solamente el tiempo y los eventos sucesivos irían poco a poco descubriendo, ante los observadores diligentes, los secretos designios del Papa Montini en su viaje a la Tierra Santa. Por eso Paulo VI estuvo más tiempo en Jordania; por eso aparentó ignorar a Israel; pos eso habló de la conversión de los judíos, aunque de una manera superficial y delicada. Era lo menos que como Papa, sucesor de Pedro, podía hacer. Sin embargo, después de esa visita, empezó a ostentar sobre su pecho el "efod" y el "pectoral del juicio" del Gran Sacerdote Levítico. La frase de Roddy, en su artículo, no viene sino a completar la maniobra del sigilo: "Los observadores del Vaticano, que estudiaron todos los movimientos de Paulo en Tierra Santa, consideraron que había menos esperanza para una declaración en favor de los judíos"(1).

Pero, esa frase, que quiere darnos la impresión de cierto desacuerdo en los criterios y las acciones de los diversos elementos del judaísmo internacional, que estaban comprometidos en esa labor de convencimiento entre los Padres Conciliares, no es sino una típica maniobra de la astucia judaica, que con diversos frentes quiere darnos la impresión de que hay división entre sus filas. Por eso añade Roddy: "Las cosas se veían con más optimismo en el Waldorf Astoria de Nueva York. Allí, con motivo del aniversario del Beth Israel Hospital, los invitados se enteraron de que al Rabino ABBA HILLEL SILVER (el apellido Silver, en español Plata, es característicamente judío y propio de los elementos más iniciados y más aptos para la conspiración judeo-masónica), años atrás, había expresado el Cardenal Francis Spellman los intentos hechos por Israel para obtener un asiento en las Naciones Unidas. Spellman había dicho que, para ayudar a esta causa, él personalmente se dirigiría a los gobiernos de Sud-Améríca, para invitarlos a que compartiesen con él el profundo deseo de que Israel fuera admitido en esa mundial Organización. Más o menos, por ese tiempo. el 'Papa Americano' (Spellman) dijo, en una reunión del Comité Judío Americano, que era "absurdo mantener que exista o pueda existir cualquiera culpabilidad hereditaria". Desde luego esta afirmación del Cardenal neoyorkino es falsa e indica carencia de conocimientos teológicos e históricos. Todos los hombres, que por generación ordinaria descendemos de Adán, venimos a la vida con esta "culpabilidad hereditaria". "In quo omnes peccaverunt", dice San Pablo, en Adán, todos pecamos. La culpabilidad personal no se hereda, pero, aun entre los hombres, sí se hereda la culpabilidad colectiva. Los hijos de los supuestos criminales de guerra en Alemania siguen todavía pagando a Israel los daños que los judíos dicen haber sufrido durante el régimen de Hitler.


(1) Todo lo que se dice aquí, a pesar de tener una antigüedad de más de 30 años, es de suma actualidad en vista de los actos llevados a cabo por Juan Pablo II y toda la Jerarquía de la Iglesia Conciliar. Han avanzado mucho desde que fueron escritas estas lineas.

[Guelfo Nero]

[franco damiani (POL)]

Cercansi urgentemente traduttori, specie dall'inglese.

[Guelfo Nero]

Padre Joaquind Saenz y Arriaga S.J (1899-1976)