Risultati da 1 a 2 di 2
  1. #1
    From beyond
    Data Registrazione
    13 Oct 2006
    Messaggi
    59,227
     Likes dati
    14,062
     Like avuti
    9,098
    Mentioned
    532 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)

    Talking Andare in Chiesa avvicina di più a Dio...

    ...andare in Chiesa avvicina di più a Dio... nel senso che rischi di andare al Creatore in anticipo...

    Emerge dai risultati di uno studio condotto da un equipe di scienziati dell'Università di Maastricht (Olanda) e pubblicato su "European respiratory journal"che l'incenso faccia male ai polmoni. La ricerca, basata sull'analisi dell'aria della basilica di Maastricht dopo una cerimonia rituale, ha evidenziato la presenza di elementi ritenuti dannosi per i polmoni. L’incenso e il fumo delle candele presenti durante la cerimonia possono infatti rilasciare delle particelle altamente cancerogene, con valori di "PM10" sino a 20 volte superiori ai limiti consentiti dall'Unione Europea. Gli scenziati hanno inoltre rilevato la presenza di elevati livelli di idrocarburi aromatici policiclici e di atomi di radicali liberi, noti in campo medico come attivatori di processi cancerogeni. Theo de Kok, autore dello studio, ha osservato come "alla fine di una giornata con le candele accese, le esalazioni erano venti volte superiori a una strada cittadina trafficata". I rischi sono quindi molto alti, aggiunge lo scienziato, la presenza di queste particelle infatti "rappresenta un pericolo per la salute dei polmoni e potrebbe causare l'insorgere di malattie respiratorie come l'enfisema e la bronchite''.

    ---------------

    Behind the label: Candles


    While nothing says holistic living like a nice candle, that warm glow may be hiding a toxic secret, warns Pat Thomas
    Most of us are aware of the health effects of combustion by-products from major outdoor sources, such as cars and power plants, and even from obvious indoor sources such as stoves. Few are aware of the potential health effects of regularly burning candles – even though these are usually lit indoors, in small, poorly ventilated spaces.

    In research by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the American Lung Association, candles have been shown to emit a frightening range of carcinogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including acetone, acetaldehyde, benzene, carbon disulfide, carbon tetrachloride, chlorobenzene carbon monoxide, creosol, cyclopentene, ethylbenzene, formaldehyde, phenol, styrene tetrachloroethene, toluene, trichloroethene and xylene.

    In addition, like anything that burns, candles produce a microscopic soot that can sometimes contain toxic heavy metals released from the candle wick.

    The purpose of a candle wick is to draw wax to fuel the candle’s flame. Generally speaking two different types of wick are used: cored and non-cored.

    Non-cored wicks are generally made of a braided or twisted fibre (usually cotton), and are considered the safest to burn. Cored wicks also use cotton, but this is wrapped around a paper or metal core to give it support. Wicks with a metal core also burn at a higher temperature, useful when the candle is made of a wax that only melts at high temperatures. Lead and cadmium are the most common metals found in cored wicks, but zinc and tin can also be used.

    As the candle burns, it releases dirty soot containing sub-micron-sized particles light enough to remain suspended in the air for considerable time, and small enough easily to be absorbed into the body once inhaled.

    Research by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has shown that burning multiple candles, or a candle with multiple wicks, can lead to high levels of indoor pollution. Scented candles give off more of this soot than unscented candles.

    The problem of candle soot was illustrated in a 2000 study at the University of Michigan School of Public Health. Researchers there examined a range of candles made in the US, Mexico and China, and measured the amount of lead they emitted while burning, as well as the amounts left in the air in an enclosed space after one hour and five hours.

    Results showed that lead emission rates for the candles ranged between 0.5 and 327 micrograms (mcg) per hour. After burning the candle for one hour, the lead levels in the air ranged from 0.04 to 13.1 mcg per cubic meter (‘safe’ levels, as defined by the US Environmental Protection Agency are 1.5 mcg per cubic meter); after five hours they were 0.21 to 65.3 mcg per cubic meter.

    More recently, in 2006, atmospheric scientist Stephan Weber of the University of Duisburg-Essen, in Essen, Germany, measured levels of micro-particles in the air of a single church over a 13-day period leading up to Christmas. His equipment measured concentrations of particles up to 10 microns (ìm) in diameter (PM10) and also those 1 ìm in diameter or smaller (PM1). The church used both candles and incense during its services, and Weber found that concentrations of both types of particle almost doubled when just candles were burned. Burning candles and incense together raised the concentration of PM10 to levels seven times those recorded between services, and PM1 to about nine times background levels.

    Concentrations of particulate matter quickly dropped after the candles were extinguished, but remained elevated for 24 hours after simultaneous use of candles and incense.

    Weber concluded that even brief exposure to contaminated air during a religious service could be harmful to some people.

    Two years earlier, researchers in the Netherlands also measured particulate matter in churches that burn candles. Theo de Kok, of Maastricht University, found that when candles had been burning in a Dutch chapel for nine hours, particles in the air there formed 10 times as many free radicals as airborne particulates collected along busy roadways travelled by 45,000 vehicles daily. It also had levels of tiny solid pollutants (PM10s) up to 20 times European limits.

    According to De Kok, PM10 from candles might be especially harmful because, in the body, constituents of the smoke readily generate free radicals that damage cells.

    Around the same time, the UK consumer magazine Proof! reported on its laboratory analysis of a range of pillar-type candles and tealights purchased from supermarkets, department and home furnishing stores in London. The smoke from the burning candles was analysed for traces of lead and cadmium. Seventeen per cent (or nearly two in 10) had detectable levels of cadmium and a small number also contained lead, though levels detected were also well below those found in other surveys. In this analysis, the candles with the most lead and cadmium were scented candles purchased at Boots. Other cadmium-containing candles came from IKEA. In common with other data, the survey found that metal-containing candles came from China, as well as Poland and Germany.

    In April 2003, the Consumer Product Safety Commission banned candles with lead wicks from being imported to or sold in the US. Other countries, including the UK, have yet to follow suit. There is no way to distinguish lead-containing wicks from safe ones, nor do labels state what a wick contains.

    Apart from how its wick is made, how ‘cleanly’ a candle burns depends on several other factors, including the type of wax it is made of, whether it is perfumed and coloured, and how long the wick is. A wick that is too large will flare and produce more soot than a properly trimmed one; and a flaring smoky flame will put particulate matter into the air no matter what the wick is made from.

    Tallow and other unprocessed animal fat, once widely used in candle-making, are no longer popular. Instead, paraffin, which is made from petroleum waste, is the most common type of candle wax. From the manufacturers’ point of view it is cheap and easy to work, has an appealing translucence and is slow-burning. Stearic acid (a component of tallow and some vegetable fats) is commonly added to paraffin candles to raise their melting point and burning time.

    Gel waxes, popular because of their crystal clarity and ability to hold colour and fragrance, are basically petroleum oil turned to jelly, and need to be used in a container (often with a reinforced wick) because the wax is very soft. Both types produce smoke and soot.

    It can be hard to make a candle using natural essential oils. Good-quality essential oils are expensive and so are not suitable for production-line candles; they also may not blend well with candle wax. They can be more volatile than synthetics and difficult to use in candles unless they have added stabilisers or fixatives.

    So manufacturers generally use more toxic synthetic fragrances. In addition to these, many types of candles contain synthetic colours. The safety of colours used in candles depends largely on the ingredients of the dye, but most synthetic dyes will give off some unsafe particles on burning.

    It is almost impossible for most consumers to tell the difference between candles with metal-containing wicks and those that are metal-free. You may wish to avoid candles made in countries such as China – though many candles on the market contain no labelling information to say what they’re made of or where they’re made. Likewise, few candles will provide information on fragrance ingredients or types of wick (indeed, this is not required). A legal requirement for clearer labelling would certainly help consumers make better choices.

    What’s in candles?

    Candles contain a complex mix of unseen and unlabelled ingredients that add to the atmospheric pollution they create. Emissions include:

    Lead
    Even low levels can adversely affect the central nervous system (brain and spinal cord), the heart, red blood cells and kidneys. Chronic exposure in adults is associated with endocrine and reproductive problems. Lead exposure in children is linked to behavioural problems and depressed intelligence.

    Cadmium
    Inhaled cadmium is carcinogenic. Overload can cause yellow teeth, dry skin, chronic bronchitis and fatigue. Toxic to liver, kidneys, bones and testes, as well as disruptive to the immune, hormone and cardiovascular systems.

    Perfume
    Synthetic perfumes contain toxins and sensitisers capable of causing cancer, birth defects and central nervous system disorders. Other toxic effects include asthma, allergies and skin disorders.

    Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
    When volatile chemicals are burned they release PAHs, which are absorbed through the skin as well as inhaled, causing skin, eye and respiratory irritation, nausea and headache. Long-term PAH exposure can cause cancer, central and peripheral nervous system damage, and hormone disruption.

    Particulates
    Microscopic particles (10 microns or less in diameter) are easily and deeply inhaled into the lungs, and can damage the heart, lungs and arteries, as well as cause respiratory problems and trigger allergies. Long-term exposure increases the risk of death from heart disease.


    Behind the label: Candles - The Ecologist

    “In amore non essere un mendicante, sii un imperatore. Dà e resta semplicemente a vedere che cosa accade...”

  2. #2
    repubblicano perciò di Sx
    Data Registrazione
    02 Apr 2009
    Località
    dove il dubbio è impossibile la certezza è sempre eguale
    Messaggi
    12,169
     Likes dati
    17
     Like avuti
    73
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito Rif: Andare in Chiesa avvicina di più a Dio...

    per quanto ne so l'incenso è favorevole all'attività dell'apparato respirtaorio. A suo tempo una ricerca dell'università di Padova studiò l'azione del fumo d'incenso unito a quello di propoli in una serie di scuole della provincia e vide come tale azione ridusse mediamente in misura più che significtiva le malattie stagionali nelle aule in cui veniva posta in essere rispetto alla medi delle rimanenti. Del resto i vantaggi dell'incenso per le mlattie respirtaorie è d sempre noto; altra cosa per le candele che sono notorimente dannose. Si tratta poi di vedere come l'incenso stesso viene bruciato . Trovo che siano ancor più pericolosi gli iscalini delle vecchie chiese del periodo della controrifoma e naturlmente l'ammassrsi di tante persone in uno stesso luogo. E non parliamo di quando viene dato l'invito allo scambiarsi il segno di pace ,le poche volte che mi sono trovato ad un funerale , oltre al fatto che mi scappa di dire piacere seguito dal nome, ho chiuso gli occhi dinnanzi all'inesorabile.
    "E' decretato che ogni uomo il quale s'accosta alla setta dei moderati debba smarrire a un tratto senso morale e dignità di coscienza?" G. Mazzini

    http://www.novefebbraio.it/

 

 

Discussioni Simili

  1. Andare in chiesa fa venire il cancro toutta?
    Di l'inquirente nel forum Laici e Laicità
    Risposte: 2
    Ultimo Messaggio: 05-08-12, 15:27
  2. Risposte: 18
    Ultimo Messaggio: 06-06-09, 03:54
  3. Come non fare andare l'8 per mille alla Chiesa Cattolica
    Di Razionalista nel forum Politica Nazionale
    Risposte: 34
    Ultimo Messaggio: 29-03-08, 01:12
  4. Risposte: 5
    Ultimo Messaggio: 24-02-06, 11:51
  5. Risposte: 26
    Ultimo Messaggio: 28-09-05, 12:01

Permessi di Scrittura

  • Tu non puoi inviare nuove discussioni
  • Tu non puoi inviare risposte
  • Tu non puoi inviare allegati
  • Tu non puoi modificare i tuoi messaggi
  •  
[Rilevato AdBlock]

Per accedere ai contenuti di questo Forum con AdBlock attivato
devi registrarti gratuitamente ed eseguire il login al Forum.

Per registrarti, disattiva temporaneamente l'AdBlock e dopo aver
fatto il login potrai riattivarlo senza problemi.

Se non ti interessa registrarti, puoi sempre accedere ai contenuti disattivando AdBlock per questo sito