"Il wokeismo ha una tendenza autoritaria". Parla la prof minacciata dai trans

[Dr. Gori]

Jordan Bardella rinnova la destra in salsa antiwokista Gori style


«Déconstruire la déconstruction» : le RN veut lutter contre le «wokisme»


Le parti à la flamme organisait, ce vendredi, un colloque pour lutter contre l' «idéologie woke».

Déconstruire la déconstruction. C'est l'ambition (pas des moindres) que s'est fixée le Rassemblement national, ce vendredi, à la maison de l'Amérique Latine dans le VIIe arrondissement parisien. Organisé par la Fondation Identité et Démocratie, le colloque consacré au «wokisme» accueille plusieurs orateurs pour décrypter ce phénomène contre lequel le parti à la flamme entend lutter. «La question est de savoir s'il s'agit d'une idéologie avec un objectif politique, d'un sectarisme ou d'une mode passagère», précise Mathilde Androuët, eurodéputée RN et présidente de la Fondation ID. Dans la salle, les initiateurs de ce colloque : Philippe Olivier et Patricia Chagnon, parlementaires européens, accompagnés de quelques élus nationaux, et de dizaines de militants et sympathisants.

C'est devant une salle comble, donc, que Jordan Bardella, président du parti, ouvre la séquence. Fustigeant un «nouveau Rousseauisme» («celui de Sandrine, pas celui de Jean-Jacques»), il appelle à «préserver l'espace public de ce puritanisme». «Après l'obsolescence de Dieu, voici venue celle des Hommes et de l'Occident. Ce mouvement, qui veut effacer les valeurs que nous portons, nous entraîne dans une régression générale et civilisationnelle», déclare-t-il, invoquant la nécessité de «mener ce combat pour la République».


https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/de...kisme-20230423

[Xenu]

[Dr. Gori]

WE’VE REACHED PEAK WOKE. ITS VIRTUE-SIGNALLING CHAMPIONS ARE BEING
HUMILIATED

The University of Oxford’s decision to intervene against its
snowflake students in support of freedom of speech is a further
indication that the tide might finally be turning on wokery. In a
letter to _The Daily Telegraph_, Prof Martin Williams, one of the
university’s pro-vice-chancellors, said what we’ve all been
thinking for months.

Telling students that they must be prepared to “encounter and
confront difficult views, including ones they find unsettling, extreme
or even offensive,” the Oxford don has effectively thrown his
support behind Prof Kathleen Stock, a leading feminist, after sections
of the student union tried to stop her from speaking at the Oxford
Union because of her gender critical views.

It should not need explaining to this country’s supposedly brightest
minds that there is no place in a world-renowned seat of learning for
the no-platforming of lawful speech.

The student union had flirted with stopping the Oxford Union from
taking a stall at this year’s freshers’ fair, but in a victory for
common sense – and a sign that the new Free Speech Act might be
having an impact – it will now be allowed to canvas for student
members come September.

As 40 other Oxford dons pointed out in another letter to this
newspaper earlier this week: “Universities exist, among other
things, to promote free inquiry and the disinterested pursuit of the
truth by means of reasoned argument.”

Again, this shouldn’t have to be explained to A* undergraduates any
more than the biological fact of there being only two sexes. But the
important thing is that the
if-you-don’t-agree-with-me-then-you’re-cancelled brigade have been
defeated. At last, the adults appear to be taking charge. And the woke
minority – who pose as “victims” of the system in an attempt to
demand special treatment from the rest of us – have been humiliated.

In fact, it has been a good week for woke humiliation. Take the
unedifying spectacle of the Duke and Duchess of Sussexes’ “near
catastrophic car chase at the hands of a ring of highly aggressive
paparazzi” in New York on Tuesday night. The couple claimed that
they had been the victims of a “relentless pursuit” over the
course of two hours which had “resulted in multiple near collisions
involving other drivers on the road, pedestrians and two NYPD
officers”.

The reality, however, appears to have been rather different, with the
NYPD describing it as a “challenging” transport situation and a
taxi driver who was involved in the “chase” commenting: “I
don’t think I would call it a chase. I never felt like I was in
danger. It wasn’t like a car chase in a movie. They [the couple]
were quiet and seemed scared but it’s New York – it’s safe.”

The Sussexes have made themselves look farcical by appearing to
exaggerate what happened. Was it a bid to reinforce their victim
status at a time when their approval rating is on a par with that of
the Duke of York? When asked about the incident, Rishi Sunak was
suitably dismissive of their histrionics, saying: “Cars in New York
are not really my priority.”

The world has now woken up to the fact that the Sussexes aren’t the
victims of anything but their own oxymoronic desire to be famously
private. After gaslighting us all by claiming that they hadn’t
accused the Royal family of racism when everyone who watched their
Oprah Winfrey interview knew that they had, they have now been forced
to dial down their highly inflammatory language to talk of
“unconscious bias” after rapidly losing credibility.

But even the all-white-people-are-unconsciously-biased routine is
losing its schtick, with Suella Braverman, the Home Secretary, this
week pointing out that: “White people do not exist in a special
state of sin or collective guilt.” If you’d said that at the
height of the Black Lives Matter campaign, you’d have been driven
out of public life. But now the public can see the sorts of extreme
claims so often made by BLM activists for what they are: nonsense with
no grounding in objective fact.

Meanwhile, up in Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon has continued to make a
fool of herself over the SNP’s ridiculous policy of allowing Scots
to change their legal sex simply by signing a declaration. First we
had the furore over double rapist Adam Graham initially being sent to
a women’s prison on the basis that he now calls himself Isla Bryson
and wears women’s leggings. Following a public outcry, he was sent
to the male estate.

Now the trans debate has been reignited in Scotland following the case
of transgender butcher Andrew Miller, known locally as “Amy”, who
admitted abducting a schoolgirl while dressed as a woman and then
subjecting her to a series of sexual assaults at his home. The case
drives a coach and horses through the SNP’s claim that making it
easier for male predators to access female-only spaces does not pose a
risk to women or girls. It is not a touching story of “transition”
but of a man, posing as a woman, to lure a young girl into his car.

Here again, then, the so-called “progressives” are facing a moment
of truth. For the reality is that the majority of Scots not only
oppose gender self-identification but have also become even more
sceptical of gender ideology than the English. A recent poll by
_UnHerd_ and Focaldata found that 31 per cent of Scottish people
strongly disagree that transgender women should use women-only spaces,
compared with 28 per cent in Wales and 27 per cent in England.

Those areas in strongest disagreement are almost all in Scotland.
Which just goes to show that you can only push people so far before
they start rebelling. The SNP will deservedly lose seats as a result
come 2024.

Then there are the woke companies, intent on ramming their marginal
and often extremist beliefs down their customers’ throats. They are
turning themselves into laughing stocks.

Bud Light is now reportedly planning a complete rebrand after
featuring a transgender influencer in a disastrous advertising
campaign. Sales of the US beer dropped by 23 per cent after the
company ran a promotion involving Dylan Mulvaney showing off bottles
with her face on them to commemorate her “365 days of girlhood”
series in which she documents her gender transition.

Traditional Bud Light drinkers were appalled and said they would
switch to another brand. When Mulvaney featured in a Nike bra advert,
this also prompted calls from consumers for a boycott of the brand.

Adidas this week faced similar flak over its baffling decision to
advertise women’s swimwear using a model with a penis. The move
rightly prompted criticism from campaigners for women’s equality in
sport, who argue that the use of a biologically male model for a
women’s swimsuit creates the impression that the sportswear brand is
trying to “erase” 51 per cent of the population.

What is the lesson of all this? For too long, the majority has been
cowed into thinking they have to go along with every ridiculous claim
spouted by woke activists and virtue-signalling celebrities. They have
been told that you would have to be a bad person to ask questions or
stand in opposition.

But in the face of ludicrous bids by the rich and powerful to play the
victim, by activists to erase J K Rowling from her own books and
remove softly spoken and thoughtful academics from campuses, and by
businesses to dress men in women’s swimming costumes, the majority
can no longer remain mute. They are finally finding their voice.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...hed-peak-woke/