cabala

[Fenriz (POL)]

salve !!

qualcuno può darmi qualche informazione o link riguardanti al acbala ebraica ???

grazie anticipati.

[stuart mill]

salve !!

qualcuno può darmi qualche informazione o link riguardanti al acbala ebraica ???

grazie anticipati.

si, ecco http://www.cabala.org/lacabala/lacabala.shtml
e poi http://www.fuocosacro.com/main_frames.htm

[Fenriz (POL)]

si, ecco http://www.cabala.org/lacabala/lacabala.shtml
e poi http://www.fuocosacro.com/main_frames.htm

grazie !!

ben fatto in maniera particolare il secondo sito !

[stuart mill]

grazie !!

ben fatto in maniera particolare il secondo sito !

prego. Si, però nel primo, se gli mandi una mail, ti mandano 2 file molto interessanti, gratis!

[Una Qualsiasi Pietra]

http://www.cabala.org/oltreilfiume/137.shtml
E' vero o é una palla? :eek::rolleyes::D:-00w09d

[Morning Star]

sulla cabala posso consigliarti non dei link ma dei libri, come "la cabala mistica" di Dion Fortune e il "liber 777" di Aleister Crowley.... quella però è cabala ermetica, su quella ebraica invece ti consiglio il "sefer yezirah" e lo "zohar"

[Una Qualsiasi Pietra]

http://www.cabala.org/oltreilfiume/137.shtml
E' vero o é una palla? :eek::rolleyes::D:-00w09d

Numerological explanations
As a dimensionless constant which does not seem to be directly related to any mathematical constant (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_constant), the fine-structure constant has long been an object of fascination to physicists. Richard Feynman (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Feynman), one of the founders of quantum electrodynamics, referred to it as "one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics: a magic number that comes to us with no understanding by man."[22] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant#cite_note-21)
In 1929, Arthur Eddington (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Eddington) conjectured that its reciprocal was precisely the integer (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integer) 137 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/137_(number)), constructed numerological (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerology) arguments that the value could be "obtained by pure deduction", and related it to the Eddington number (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddington_number), his estimate of the number of protons in the Universe. Other physicists neither adopted this conjecture nor accepted his arguments, and by the 1940s, experimental values for 1⁄α deviated sufficiently from 137 to reject that value.[23] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant#cite_note-22)
Recently the mathematician James Gilson (http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~jgg/) has suggested [2] (http://www.fine-structure-constant.org/) that the fine-structure constant has the value:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/2/c/4/2c4ed36907cce7201ce0b456a4a0025c.png , 29 and 137 being the 10th and 33rd prime numbers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_number). This deviates from the 2006 CODATA (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CODATA) value for α by about one standard uncertainty of measurement, but by more than seven standard deviations from the best α value currently known (2007).
The fine structure constant so intrigued the physicist Wolfgang Pauli (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Pauli) that he even collaborated with the psychologist Carl Jung (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Jung) in an extraordinary quest to understand its significance.[24] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant#cite_note-23)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant



:-0#09g