Risultati da 1 a 4 di 4
  1. #1
    kshatrya
    Data Registrazione
    21 Oct 2002
    Località
    Thule
    Messaggi
    1,216
     Likes dati
    0
     Like avuti
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito interessante progetto USA

    Racial Partition for Racial Preservation

    by
    Richard McCulloch


    A racial partition of the United States for the purpose of racial preservation and independence would involve the creation of separate, independent and sovereign racial nations in accordance with the principles of racial rights, racial security and the Racial Compact. A just partition would take into consideration the relative historical role of each racial group as well as their current position, and a practical partition would seek to create compact racial nations with geographical integrity and the shortest possible borders for their area. Persons of mixed racial ancestry would be classified according to their visible racial traits, characteristics and identity (or phenotype) and assigned to the most appropriate racial nation. Racially-mixed families would be classified and assigned according to the racial identity or phenotype of the children. Many different plans for partition are possible. The author offers the following proposal as one possibility for consideration.



    For the purpose of geographic partition for racial preservation and independence, the population of the United States could be divided into seven racial groupings, as listed below:

    1. A Nordish (Northern European) centered racial grouping consisting of the Nordish-American population and the "near Nordish" racial elements -- i.e., those most similar and closely related to, and therefore most easily assimilated by, the Nordish population. These would include the Alpine, Dinaric and Ladogan populations of central and eastern European origin. Assimilated southern Europeans would also be eligible for inclusion in this grouping. These racial elements can be regarded as assimilable by the Nordish-American population within the existing proportions. This grouping comprised 86% of the U.S. population in 1880, 77.3% in 1970, and 65.5% in 1994.
    2. A Congoid (Sub-Saharan African) grouping consisting of all members of the Congoid race (including all persons of obvious partial Congoid ancestry) in North America, and all those in Europe who cannot be practically or humanely repatriated to their own ancestral homelands. This group comprised 11.1% of the U.S. population in 1970 and 12.1% in 1994.
    3. A Latin Amerindian racial grouping consisting of the Mexican, Central and South American Indian and Mestizo population. This group, the majority of the U.S. "Hispanic" population, comprised 2.5% of the U.S. population in 1970 and 8.8% in 1994.
    4. A North Amerindian group consisting of the native North American Indian population. This group comprised .4% of the U.S. population in 1970 and .8% in 1994.
    5. An East Asian racial grouping consisting of those members of the Northeast Asian and Southeast Asian races in North America, and all those in Europe who cannot be practically or humanely repatriated to their own ancestral homelands. This group comprised 1% of the U.S. population in 1970 and 2.7% in 1994.
    6. A Mediterranid-Armenid racial grouping which would include the Southern European and other European racial elements not included with the Nordish centered group, together with the Armenid racial elements. This grouping comprised 7% of the U.S. population in 1970 and 6.9% in 1994.
    7. A North African and West Asian racial grouping that would include the Pakistani and Asian Indian (Indic and Dravidic), Irano-Afgan, Turanid (Turkic), Orientalid (Arabic) and Mediterranid populations of North African and West Asian origin in North America, as well as those in Europe who cannot be practically or humanely repatriated to their own ancestral homelands. This grouping comprised .1% of the U.S. population in 1970 and 1.8% in 1994.

    In addition to the above groupings are the Caribbean population elements of mixed Afro-European ancestry, mostly Puerto Ricans and Dominicans, which comprised .7% of the mainland U.S. population in 1970 and 1.4% in 1994. The members of this population who do not wish to return to their Caribbean homelands should be assigned to the most appropriate of the above groupings according to their racial identity.
    As illustrated by the above map, an independent nation for the Congoid racial group could be formed out of the area of the states of Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Arkansas north of the Colorado river, west of the Mississippi river, and south of the Arkansas river. It would include the cities of Little Rock, Shreveport, Oklahoma City, Dallas, Houston, Galveston, Austin and Amarillo. Its territory would be about 257,823 square miles (larger than France, which has an area of 213,009 square miles, or Kenya, which has an area of 224,081 square miles).

    An independent nation for the "Latin" or "Hispanic" Amerindian and Mestizo racial group could be formed from the territory of Texas south of the Colorado river, and New Mexico south of the line of 35 degrees north latitude. It would include the cities of San Antonio, Corpus Christi, El Paso and Alamogordo. Its area would total about 198,901 square miles (larger than Spain, which has an area of 195,988 square miles).

    An independent nation for the North American Amerindian population could be created out of the states of Arizona and New Mexico north of the line of 35 degrees north latitude and east of the Little Colorado and Colorado rivers. It would include the cities of Santa Fe and Albuquerque. Its territory would be about 66,798 square miles.

    An independent nation for the East Asian population could be formed from San Diego, Orange, Riverside and Imperial counties in California and Yuma county in Arizona. Its area would be 21,961 square miles (larger than Taiwan, which has 13,814 square miles) and would include the cities of San Diego, Anaheim, Palm Springs and Riverside.

    The Mediterranid-Armenid grouping could be formed into two independent nations. One could consist of Florida south of the line of 29 degrees latitude and north of Long Key, with an area of about 28,100 square miles (about the size of the Netherlands, with 15,770 square miles, and Belgium, with 11,779 square miles, added together). It would include the cities of Miami, Tampa and Orlando. The other could consist of San Bernardino, Santa Barbara, Ventura, and Los Angeles counties in California, Clark county in Nevada, and all of Arizona except for Yuma county and the territory which is part of the native Amerindian nation, with an area of about 126,162 square miles (larger than Italy, which has 116,311 square miles). It would include the cities of Los Angeles, Long Beach, Las Vegas, Flagstaff, Winslow, Phoenix and Tucson. The total combined area of both nations would be about 154,262 square miles.

    An independent nation for the West Asian and North African grouping could be formed from Monterey, San Benito, Fresno, Kings, Tulare, San Luis Obispo and Kern counties in California. Its area would be 28,307 square miles (again, as in the preceding paragraph, about the same size as the Netherlands and Belgium added together) and would include the cities of Fresno and Bakersfield.

    The Hawaiian islands to the west of Oahu (Kauai, etc.) could be reserved for the native Pacific Islanders. Oahu and the islands to the east would belong to the Nordish nation, as the "crossroads of the Pacific" providing a strategically vital link between the Nordish countries of North America and those of Australia and New Zealand.

    The remaining territory of the United States would be an independent nation for the Nordish centered racial group. Its population of about 168 million (based on 1994 U.S. population figures) would be about 86.9% Nordish (146 million) and 13.1% Alpine-Dinaric-Ladogan (22 million), plus whatever number of eligible "assimilated" Mediterranids would choose to be a part of it.

    The land area of the 48 contiguous states is 2,962,031 square miles. The partition proposal detailed above would allocate 2,234,573 square miles, or 75.4% of this area, to the Nordish centered racial grouping, which comprised 77.3% of the U.S. population in 1970 and 65.5% in 1994 (or about 168 million people out of a total population of 258 million). It would allocate 727,548 square miles, or 24.6% of the area of the 48 contiguous states, to the other racial groups, who in 1994 totaled 90 million or 34.5% of the population, but in 1970 comprised only 22.7% of the population. Thus, this proposal would grant 75.4% of the area of the 48 contiguous states to the racial group that was 77.3% of the population in 1970, and 24.6% of the area to the groups that totaled 22.7% of the population in 1970.

    All of the independent non-Nordish nations resulting from the racial partition would be situated along the southern periphery of the United States. As the southern periphery already borders a non-Nordish country and region (Mexico and the Caribbean) this would minimize the length of borders between the Nordish and non-Nordish races. None of the territory allotted to the non-Nordish nations belonged to the United States before 1803. To prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons, any nuclear weapons or production facilities located in non-Nordish areas would be moved to new sites within the Nordish area. Prisoners and other institutionalized persons would go with their race. With the exception of indigenous peoples, non-Nordish racial elements in the other Nordish countries of Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand would be encouraged to repatriate to their own racial homelands. Otherwise they could join other members of their race in the appropriate successor state as given above.

  2. #2
    Simply...cat!
    Data Registrazione
    05 Mar 2002
    Località
    Brescia,Lombardia,Padania
    Messaggi
    17,080
     Likes dati
    0
     Like avuti
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito

    McCulloch è un cazzone: se in Svezia c'e' un 70% di Hallstatt Nordic,io sono S.Francesco.
    Massimo,massimo in Svezia è rimasto un 20-30% in qualche vallata.

  3. #3
    kshatrya
    Data Registrazione
    21 Oct 2002
    Località
    Thule
    Messaggi
    1,216
     Likes dati
    0
     Like avuti
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito

    comunque l'idea di separare i bianchi dai colored è buona. Sarebbe meglio però, invece di creare tanti stati separati, espellere del tutto i colored: mongoloidi in asia orientale (Filippine andrebbe bene), indo-araboidi, latinos e negri in america latina. Magari sistemarli nella regione amazzonica.
    Ai messicani si potrebbe restituire una fetta di Texas, Arizona, N.Mex. e California, tanto per farli contenti. La Florida potrebbe divenire uno stato del caribe a base ispanica, come Cuba.
    Il resto degli States sarebbe bianco puro, con qualche riserva di native americans.

  4. #4
    philanthropist
    Data Registrazione
    09 Jun 2009
    Messaggi
    59,720
     Likes dati
    4,847
     Like avuti
    11,405
    Mentioned
    1728 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)

    Predefinito assolutamente NO

    Originally posted by Aryan
    comunque l'idea di separare i bianchi dai colored è buona. Sarebbe meglio però, invece di creare tanti stati separati, espellere del tutto i colored: mongoloidi in asia orientale (Filippine andrebbe bene), indo-araboidi, latinos e negri in america latina. Magari sistemarli nella regione amazzonica.
    Ai messicani si potrebbe restituire una fetta di Texas, Arizona, N.Mex. e California, tanto per farli contenti. La Florida potrebbe divenire uno stato del caribe a base ispanica, come Cuba.
    Il resto degli States sarebbe bianco puro, con qualche riserva di native americans.
    Perche' stiamo bene cosi. Del resto, piu' leggo di certi "caucasian" in questo forum, piu' capisco i neri....
    -N-

 

 

Discussioni Simili

  1. Interessante
    Di Rexal nel forum Fondoscala
    Risposte: 8
    Ultimo Messaggio: 19-04-11, 00:05
  2. Risposte: 17
    Ultimo Messaggio: 19-12-09, 02:18
  3. Risposte: 0
    Ultimo Messaggio: 23-02-08, 15:33
  4. Un'intervista interessante....molto interessante...
    Di Gianfranco nel forum Prima Repubblica di POL
    Risposte: 52
    Ultimo Messaggio: 04-10-06, 18:07
  5. Cunsulta.com, un interessante progetto democratico per la Corsica
    Di tziu flat eric nel forum Sardegna - Sardìnnia
    Risposte: 0
    Ultimo Messaggio: 13-01-03, 13:44

Permessi di Scrittura

  • Tu non puoi inviare nuove discussioni
  • Tu non puoi inviare risposte
  • Tu non puoi inviare allegati
  • Tu non puoi modificare i tuoi messaggi
  •  
[Rilevato AdBlock]

Per accedere ai contenuti di questo Forum con AdBlock attivato
devi registrarti gratuitamente ed eseguire il login al Forum.

Per registrarti, disattiva temporaneamente l'AdBlock e dopo aver
fatto il login potrai riattivarlo senza problemi.

Se non ti interessa registrarti, puoi sempre accedere ai contenuti disattivando AdBlock per questo sito