Bravo.


Bravo.




Comunque ripeto la domanda già fatta "Noi chi?"
L'Occidente, inteso come Francia, Germania, Italia e Spagna non è più in Iraq.


contro chi "staremmo" vincendo...??
ti riporto uno tra i tanti univoci commenti relativi alla notizia da te postata:
"I'm confused. Nineteen troops died last month, and perhaps fifty were permanently disabled. If we hadn't invaded Iraq, all of them would still be alive and well.
Al Qaeda in Iraq is "nearer to defeat than ever before". If we hadn't invaded Iraq, AQI would never have existed.
Iraq is slowly getting more stable. Iraq was already stable before we destabilized it by invading.
All the evidence tells us that invading Iraq was a terrible mistake - not least because the casus belli turned out to be completely false.
This month, the negative consequences of that mistake are somewhat lesser than in other months. This month, fewer people died for that mistake - though hundreds still died.
So therefore it wasn't a mistake?
If I run a lab, and I release some terrible virus into society, and it kills 50,000 people in the first year, 100,000 in the second, 150,000 in the third, 200,000 in the fourth ... if that virus only kills 75,000 in the fifth year, does that mean I was right to release it? That I've been vindicated?
No war, no civil war can last for ever. The Iraq war supporters' argument seems to be that if the killing ever peaks and declines, that decline proves all the killing was good. So unless the killing in Iraq continues to increase until the end of time, they will consider the war a success.
Why is this war a victory? What have we gained? What would we have lost if we hadn't started this war?
Watch the brave war supporters flee from answering these questions."
Complimenti per la vostra barbara "vittoria".
![]()


In Iraq, come in Vietnam, non ci sarà mai vittoria degli Stati Uniti, perchè sono un fattore esterno che non conta nulla...
Il problema è interno e va risolto tra di loro...









