cabala

[Fenriz (POL)]

salve !!

qualcuno può darmi qualche informazione o link riguardanti al acbala ebraica ???

grazie anticipati.

[stuart mill]

salve !!

qualcuno può darmi qualche informazione o link riguardanti al acbala ebraica ???

grazie anticipati.

si, ecco http://www.cabala.org/lacabala/lacabala.shtml
e poi http://www.fuocosacro.com/main_frames.htm

[Fenriz (POL)]

si, ecco http://www.cabala.org/lacabala/lacabala.shtml
e poi http://www.fuocosacro.com/main_frames.htm

grazie !!

ben fatto in maniera particolare il secondo sito !

[stuart mill]

grazie !!

ben fatto in maniera particolare il secondo sito !

prego. Si, però nel primo, se gli mandi una mail, ti mandano 2 file molto interessanti, gratis!

[Una Qualsiasi Pietra]

http://www.cabala.org/oltreilfiume/137.shtml
E' vero o é una palla?

[Morning Star]

sulla cabala posso consigliarti non dei link ma dei libri, come "la cabala mistica" di Dion Fortune e il "liber 777" di Aleister Crowley.... quella però è cabala ermetica, su quella ebraica invece ti consiglio il "sefer yezirah" e lo "zohar"

[Una Qualsiasi Pietra]

http://www.cabala.org/oltreilfiume/137.shtml
E' vero o é una palla?

Numerological explanations
As a dimensionless constant which does not seem to be directly related to any mathematical constant, the fine-structure constant has long been an object of fascination to physicists. Richard Feynman, one of the founders of quantum electrodynamics, referred to it as "one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics: a magic number that comes to us with no understanding by man."[22]
In 1929, Arthur Eddington conjectured that its reciprocal was precisely the integer 137, constructed numerological arguments that the value could be "obtained by pure deduction", and related it to the Eddington number, his estimate of the number of protons in the Universe. Other physicists neither adopted this conjecture nor accepted his arguments, and by the 1940s, experimental values for 1⁄α deviated sufficiently from 137 to reject that value.[23]
Recently the mathematician James Gilson has suggested [2] that the fine-structure constant has the value:
, 29 and 137 being the 10th and 33rd prime numbers. This deviates from the 2006 CODATA value for α by about one standard uncertainty of measurement, but by more than seven standard deviations from the best α value currently known (2007).
The fine structure constant so intrigued the physicist Wolfgang Pauli that he even collaborated with the psychologist Carl Jung in an extraordinary quest to understand its significance.[24]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant