



Quando succedono queste cose non so mai che pensare: sono atrocità, ma noi che scuoiamo maiali e conigli allora, cosa siamo?
"Ah sì, ma quelli sono da mangiare..."
Chi lo dice? E' solo una prassi consolidata...
[quote=Liberal;8520446]Il filmato è veramente Duro e Crudele ...io non riesco a guardarlo tutto...
http://www.furisdead.com/feat/ChineseFurFarms/
quoto in pieno il tuo disprezzo verso un regime che non ha nessuna pieta' nemmeno verso gli animali:
![]()
In order to be objective, let us immediately clear up any clichés or facile exploitation of facts: we have no desire to denigrate the Chinese for eating animals that we in the West never eat. This is part of their local customs and must be respected, just as local customs in other countries must be respected. Crocodile tripe, lizard sauce or zebu casserole are enjoyed in Ethiopia. In Madagascar parrots and squirrels end up roasted, in the Congo they prefer boa snakes. Wingless termites roasted in banana leaves or live black ants are considered a delicacy in Cameroon, as caimans are in New Guinea. We have no intention to question nor to share these practices. We will simply speak about the pointless violence to which animals are subjected.
Traditionally, the Chinese were not enemies of animals… on the contrary. In the China of yesteryear the care of small animals was considered a pleasure for young and old alike; not only dogs but also birds, particularly nightingales and crickets were bred. There is quite an extensive literature about crickets which dates back many centuries. In fact, it was a tradition for each dynasty to reprint a famous handbook on how to breed, train, and take care of crickets as well as how to improve their singing and their combat skills. To a Chinese person, having a canary or a nightingale as a pet did not mean keeping it at home as an ornament; it meant having a companion to go for walks with, to talk to and play with. A way to wish somebody happiness was to say “may you become old and have a grandchild and a bird in your care.” Walking along the street, you may often witness this scene: an old man pushing a bamboo baby carriage and a cage with a bird right next to it.
We don’t know why, but this kind of treatment was not approved by the Maoist regime. One popular explanation was that “when Mao tried to escape from prison he was captured because of a wall which he was unable to climb and a dog growling at his heels. I’ll pull down all the walls and put down all the dogs if ever I become emperor of China, young Mao swore to himself. And, as soon as he became the leader of China he kept his promise: he ordered that all the walls of Beijing be destroyed and all dogs be eliminated.” (Tiziano Terzani, La Porta Proibita)
We do not know if this is true or a legend but in Beijing, at the beginning of Maoism, a mass slaughter of dogs took place in which the animals were strangled or beaten to death. Then came the turns of cats, birds and all those animals accused of ruining the Chinese economy. This word “economy”… is one of the key words of the problem.
The new Chinese economic policy combines - at least from the ruling class’ point of view - the best aspects of communism and wild capitalism admirably well. Even the Chinese Prime Minister has euphemistically underlined the “imperfect” distribution of the domestic product. Chinese “capitalist-communism” is becoming sadly famous for its lack of regard for the work force… the priority is to reduce costs of production. Where the economy is based on breeding animals and fur animals, reduction of costs is almost totally placed upon the animals: fewer regulations, lower costs, higher profits.
In just a few years, thanks its total lack of protection of animals, China has become the most sought after country in the fashion world due to the low cost of its furs.
Obviously animals in China have to exist without dignity since good fodder, hygiene and spacious cages are luxuries that the Chinese have no intention of providing. But just one question … is it that expensive to kill those poor creatures in a compassionate manner, instead of skinning them alive?
And what about animals destined for food products? Low-quality fodder, a low level of hygiene, lots of chemicals, lots of profit.
I just lost my appetite.
The Solution: Boycott the Olympics - Boycott Chinese products![]()
Codice PHP:[CODE]
[quote=Liberal;8520446]Il filmato è veramente Duro e Crudele ...io non riesco a guardarlo tutto...
http://www.furisdead.com/feat/ChineseFurFarms/
Questo è una delle tante violazioni dei diritti in Cina. L'atrocità che si vede in queste scene non deve farci dimenticare i milioni di schiavi cinesi costretti a lavorare senza diritti per farci arrivare nei nostri supermercati le marci a basso costo.
Vergogna alla regime Capitalcpmunista cinese... Altro che giochi olimipici... :mad:[/quote]
[/CODE]
Caro Liberal,finalmente una voce fuori dal coro,benvenuto!Questo regime fa' veramente schifo!
http://www.unmadeinchina.org/galleri...=41&pagProv=29
Salutoni!![]()


Sono animali.


ah adesso i diritti umani non tirano più? siam passati ai diritti animali?![]()
Non lo sai che fa parte del pacchetto del giovane contestatore anti cinese?
Classifica deglia rgomenti piu usati dagli anti cinesi:
-un miliardo e 300 milioni di schiavi(quindi nessun mercato interno) che lavorano nei laogai,vero motore del economia cinese.
-il governo tortura gli animali o/e i cinesi amano torturare gli animali
-gli aborti forzati e il figlio unico(tuttavia ora non tira più )
-i cinesi ci avvelenano(chissa poi con chi fanno affari..)
-i cinesi sono mafiosi
-Il Tibet era un paradiso in terra prima dell invasione cinese
..........
La frase classica del filocinese quando gli vengono mostrati 100 articoli tutti diversi,inoppugnabili perche' facilmente documentabili e':sempre il solito disinformatore,dicci qualcosa di diverso....(nonostante i 100 articoli diversi....).Be',discutere del governo cinese allo stato attuale e' come sparare sulla croce rossa.Aggiornatevi sulla parte inglese di www.unmadeinchina.org:
occhio,li'ci sono molto piu' di 100 diversi articoli....![]()


sì ma chi se ne frega se mangiano gli animali o se li mettono addosso
a me frega di quello che fanno alle persone, non agli animali