BRICS: Ed ora?

[Shiiva]

Il nome giusto sarebbe briCs. Tolto la Cina son tutti paesi di morti di fame

Dici che la Cina li sta' sfamando tutti quanti?

[the fool]

Dici che la Cina li sta' sfamando tutti quanti?

no, ha solo detto che gli altri sono morti di fame.

[Shiiva]

no, ha solo detto che gli altri sono morti di fame.

Oh.

[Amati75]

Il nome giusto sarebbe briCs. Tolto la Cina son tutti paesi di morti di fame

Ti hanno letto nel pensiero:


The first rule of getting people to invest with you is coming up with an acronym. After all, everybody loves a good acronym. So that's what Goldman Sachs did 15 years ago when it coined the term "BRICs"—that's short for Brazil, Russia, India, and China—to describe the emerging markets that you had to have money in.
It was always a lie.
If that wasn't obvious before, it should be now. Consider this: Brazil is stuck in its worst recession since the 1930s, but still has double-digit inflation. That's what happens when your debt bubble and the global commodities bubble burst at the same time that your sinking currency sends prices soaring from their already elevated levels. And its government hasn't even been able to do anything about this, because it's collapsing itself due to a slow-motion corruption scandal.
Then there's Russia. It never had an economy so much as an oil-exporting business that subsidized everything else, so it's also shrinking now that oil prices have fallen so far -- which, of course, Western sanctions have only made worse. Now, India is actually doing pretty well, but it's still struggling to streamline its regulations and build enough infrastructure so that it can grow as much as it could. And China might be growing fast compared to almost any other country, but not to its own lofty standards. Money is pouring out now that China's economy is starting to slow down under the weight of having built more factories than it needs and borrowed more money than it wants. That's made its stock market crash, and would have made its currency do so as well if the government's wasn't spending so much to prop it up.
But it's not just that it doesn't make sense to talk about the BRICs any more. It's that it never made sense to talk about the BRICs. The only thing that ever mattered was the "C". The problem, though, is that that doesn't make for a catchy acronym. You can see what I mean in the chart below. It shows how much each country's GDP per capita has changed as a share of the United States' since the end of the Cold War, adjusted for how much things cost in each nation. The idea is that these countries should be growing faster than the U.S., so that they start to catch up. But that's not what has happened—at least not for all of them. Indeed, Russia's incomes have gone from 42.1 percent of those in the U.S. in 1992 to 41.3 percent today; Brazil's have done about as bad, going from 27.6 percent to 27 percent; India's have been a little better, going from 5 percent to 11.5 percent; and only China's have made up a lot of ground by going from 4.9 percent to 26.3 percent.

In other words, Brazil and Russia have actually fallen further behind the U.S., India has caught up a little bit, and China really has. Maybe the best way to tell that is this: China was a little poorer than India in 1992, but is now more than twice as rich.

Source: IMF
And now you can see why China's slowdown is such a big deal. It was growing so fast that it was pulling the rest of the developing world with it. That's what the commodities bubble was. China, you see, was building so many roads and bridges and factories that it had an almost insatiable appetite for raw materials—which boosted Brazil and Russia's commodity-driven economies. So now that China is gearing down from mega-growth to merely very fast growth, those other economies are gearing down as well. Except in their case, that means going from good growth to none at all, or even negative growth.
Maybe the next big acronym should be C-H-I-N-A.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-that-matters/

[Geralt di Rivia]

Ti hanno letto nel pensiero:

Il tuo pensiero è molto semplice, visto che sei costretto a stare qui dentro a dire cacate non avendo amici in America perché fai schifo a tutti, amatina.

Ma cosa ti fa pensare di riuscire a far venire la bava alla bocca agli altri utenti, visto che tutti si divertono a prenderti per il culo? Forse un coglione frustrato come te ha bisogno di credersi migliore di quello che è, per non ammettere che la tua vita sia completamente vuota.

Mi hanno detto che tua moglie si diverte a farti le corna mentre tu stai sempre collegato nel forum, io starei attento fossi in te.

Mi raccomando, gli aerei civili non partono mai in ritardo perché l'aereoporto li avverte prima, e controllano sempre il carburante prima di partire, quindi gli aerei che vengono fermati sono solo quelli militari, inoltre la parola arabo si usa per usare tutti quei popoli del Mediooriente che sono simili a loro, come gli iraniani, per fare prima, te lo ripeto perché ogni volta tiri fuori sempre le stesse cazzate.

Inoltre, io a differenza tua posso sbagliare una volta sola, tu spari cazzate in continuazione.

[Amati75]

Chi si rivede, il Geraldino, che ha scritto (l'ho in ignore)?
Presumo abbia scritto qualcosa di profondo, intelligente e sicuramente esatto.

[Geralt di Rivia]

Chi si rivede, il Geraldino, che ha scritto (l'ho in ignore)?
Presumo abbia scritto qualcosa di profondo, intelligente e sicuramente esatto.

Certamente scrivo cose molto più intelligenti di te e il tuo comparone, amatina.
Hai provato a metterti il dito medio nel culo? O magari preferisci quell'africano da cui tu dicevi di andare per farti sodomizzare?
Io voglio censurare solo i provocatori del cazzo come te, che vengono qui solo per rovinare le discussioni, le persone intelligenti che hanno opinioni diverse non si censurano.
Ma visto che mi hai messo in ignore, vuol dire che hai esaurito le cazzate da dire, quindi ho vinto io, testa di cazzo.

[agaragar]

A key forecast had been that Brics taken together would equal half the GDP of the G6 by 2025. That forecast was virtually reached in double-quick time. By 2014 the combined Brics GDP, at $16.6 trillion, was 49.1 per cent of the G6 total of $33.8 trillion. In 2003 the ratio had been just 15 per cent. Further, the forecast for India had been that its GDP would become bigger than Italy’s (the smallest of the G6) in 2015. That too is about to happen. The International Monetary Fund's last forecast for 2015 put India’s GDP at $2.18 trillion, ahead of Italy’s $1.82 trillion. In 2003, Italy had been two-and-a-half times India’s size.

T N Ninan:Why BRICS is no longer a saleable idea | Business Standard Column

Ci risiamo col prodotto in valore monetario,

L'economia reale indiana è 2 volte e mezzo quella italiana, e ha superato quella del Giappone
Oggi le economie bric in termini reali sono circa il 75% del G6

[agaragar]

E' rimasto solo IC (India e Cina), perche' Brasile e Russia son messi abbastanza male e certo non sono in sviluppo.

*volevano colpire le teste anglofone con dei BRICs, invece la NUCA e' stata più forte e si stanno rompendo.
Nez Zealand
USA
Canada
Australia

Il Brasile si riprenderà a breve, apposta bush ha scatenato la Crisi

Auguri per la Nuova Zelanda, prossimo gigante economico mondiale

[blobb]

Il Brasile si riprenderà a breve, apposta bush ha scatenato la Crisi

Auguri per la Nuova Zelanda, prossimo gigante economico mondiale

sbaglio o il canada sta in recessione??

Il Canada rimarrà in recessione tecnica - MilanoFinanza.it