Thread contenitore generico sugli USA

[Marximiliano]

Vabbè negli usa ogni tanto crollano cose, pure in italia...

[Giulio962]

https://tg24.sky.it/mondo/2024/03/29...an-interazioni

La Cina: "Gli Usa fermino tutte le interazioni militari con Taiwan”

Lo ha sottolineato il portavoce del ministero degli Esteri, Lin Jian, dopo la diffusione delle notizie arrivate da Taipei secondo cui il capo della Marina, Tang Hua, visiterà gli Stai Uniti la prossima settimana con l’intento di partecipare ad una cerimonia militare. Oltre che, probabilmente, per discutere di temi che riguardano il rafforzamento della cooperazione navale bilaterale tra i due Paesi

La Cina ha dichiarato di opporsi “con fermezza" alle interazioni militari "tra la sua regione di Taiwan e gli Stati Uniti". Lo ha confermato il portavoce del ministero degli Esteri Lin Jian, dopo la diffusione delle notizie rimbalzate da Taipei secondo cui il capo della Marina, Tang Hua, visiterà gli Stai Uniti la prossima settimana con l’intento di partecipare ad una cerimonia militare. Oltre che, probabilmente, per discutere di temi che riguardano il rafforzamento della cooperazione navale bilaterale in una fase in cui la stessa Cina sta rafforzando le sue minacce verso l'isola ribelle. "Esortiamo gli Usa ad aderire al principio della 'Unica Cina' e ai tre comunicati congiunti", ha sottolineato ancora Lin

[alpha12000]

https://thehill.com/business/4562321...-market-debut/

Trump social media company defies expectations in stock market debut

[alpha12000]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mai...ia-court-rules

A Pennsylvania federal appeals court has ruled that mail-in ballots received without accurate handwritten dates on the outside of envelopes are not valid, a ruling that will have a significant impact on this year's elections in the key battleground state.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled 2-1 on Wednesday, overturning a lower court’s November decision.
The lower court had ruled that even without the proper dates, mail-in ballots should be counted if received on time. The court said that "trivial paperwork" errors disenfranchised voters and violated the Materiality Provision of the U.S. Civil Rights Act of 1964, which states that immaterial errors or omissions should not be used to prevent voting.
But in Wednesday’s federal appeals court’s opinion, Judge Thomas Ambro wrote that under a state legislature passed law, mail-in voters must write the date on their envelopes in order to make their vote effective.
"The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously held this ballot-casting rule is mandatory; thus, failure to comply renders a ballot invalid under Pennsylvania law," Ambro wrote.
The Materiality Provision "only applies when the State is determining who may vote," Ambro wrote.
Under a state law passed in 2019, Pennsylvania voters must "fill out, date and sign the declaration printed on [the] envelope" before returning their ballot.
Proponents of mail-in ballots argue it makes voting more convenient, as well as being easier for senior citizens and people with disabilities to vote. However, some Republicans say that the process raises serious election integrity issues, while former President Donald Trump has blasted the system as "totally corrupt" and blames it, in part, for his 2020 election loss.
In Pennsylvania, Democrats have been far more likely to vote by mail than Republicans.
"This is a crucial victory for election integrity and voter confidence in the Keystone State and nationwide," Michael Whatley, the chair of the Republican National Committee said in a statement.
"Pennsylvanians deserve to feel confident in the security of their mail ballots, and this Third Circuit ruling roundly rejects unlawful left-wing attempts to count undated or incorrectly dated mail ballots."
The American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, which helped represent groups and voters who challenged the date mandate, said that voters will lose as a result of the ruling.
"If this ruling stands, thousands of Pennsylvania voters could lose their vote over a meaningless paperwork error," said Mike Lee, the executive director of the ACLU in Pennsylvania.
"The ballots in question in this case come from voters who are eligible and who met the submission deadline. In passing the Civil Rights Act, Congress put a guardrail in place to be sure that states don’t erect unnecessary barriers that disenfranchise voters. It’s unfortunate that the court failed to recognize that principle."
In the 2022 midterms, more than 7,600 mailed ballots in 12 counties were tossed because their outer envelopes lacked dates or had incorrect dates, according to the decision.

[alpha12000]

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/p...4/73154714007/

Republican Donald Trump has been open about deliberately using inflammatory words to attract attention in the 2024 presidential race.
If you don't use certain language "that maybe are not very nice words, nothing will happen," the former president said in a March interview with Fox News host Howard Kurtz.
Trump employed that signature tactic during his infamous June 2015 announcement speech when he described some Mexican immigrants as criminals and rapists, which he later admitted was planned.
It is a style that excites his conservative base as a leader who rejects the supposed political correctness imposed by liberal Democrats. But it is something that alarms detractors and frightens experts who described it as an authoritarian-leaning campaign, especially in the aftermath of the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol led by Trump supporters.
"Wake up people. This is an emergency. This is what authoritarian thugs and terrorists do," Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a history professor at New York University and author of "Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present" said in March 29 post on X.
She was referring to Trump sharing a video this past week of a pickup truck that had a decal with President Joe Biden hogtied.
Yet that use of language and imagery is something Trump has intensified in his increasingly personal grudge rematch against Biden this year.
"Your victory will be our ultimate vindication, your liberty will be our ultimate reward and the unprecedented success of the United States of America will be my ultimate and absolute revenge," Trump said during this year's Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in February.
With the campaign now shifting to general election mode, more attention is being paid to Trump's rhetoric on the campaign trail and the use of macabre imagery online to convey his ideas.
Here are some key takeaways to keep in mind.
Sometimes it's direct and profane; other times it is suggestive enough to give the presumptive GOP nominee wiggle room to deny Democratic claims.
But it's always meant to get a reaction, whether from allies or critics, especially on hot button topics such as immigration and crime.
In March alone, Trump raised eyebrows when he said some undocumented migrants coming to the U.S. were "not people." That outrage was matched a few weeks later by those furious when he said Jewish Americans who vote Democratic hate Israel and "their religion."
One of the more pronounced backlashes from liberals this month, however, appeared to play into Trump's hands.
At an Ohio rally, he said the nation would face a “bloodbath” should he lose this November. That remark sent Democrats through the roof, but it was in the context of his call for a strict tariff on Chinese-made cars to protect the U.S. automakers.
"We're going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you’re not going to be able to sell those guys if I get elected," Trump said.
"Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath for the whole – that’s gonna be the least of it. It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That’ll be the least of it."
Part of the reason Democrats, anti-Trump Republicans and political observers pounce on every word out of Trump's mouth is a broader anxiety about the state of American democracy.
This is primarily based on the 2021 Capitol riot, which saw roughly 140 police officers injured and hundreds of other Trump-aligned individuals charged with trying to overturn the 2020 election.
That Trump was the "central cause" of the attack, according to a 2022 House investigative committee report, is often lost in the day-to-day campaign coverage.
It also links backs to his ongoing refusal to admit losing the last presidential contest, which has become a GOP litmus test and further fuels much of the concern about his rhetoric.
As far back as 2016, Trump alluded to "riots" by supporters if he didn't win the Republican nomination. Since then, he often brings up potential violence or uses violent images when either discussing political issues or his multiple court cases.
Trump raised the possibility of "bedlam" overtaking the country in the face of legal challenges to his candidacy; "potential death (and) destruction" when the Manhattan district attorney was pursuing the ongoing hush-money case; and sharing images of him carrying a baseball bat near Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's head in a since-deleted Truth Social post.
One thing that is different about this era of politics is swearing in public is far more acceptable.
When speaking about Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who's prosecuting the Georgia election fraud case against Trump, the former president mocked her name during the Ohio rally, for instance.
"It's spelled ‘fanny,’ like your a--, right?" Trump said. At other times he has dropped four-letter words and worse.
As USA Today reporter Sudiksha Kochi noted, Trump has helped usher a new era of foul-mouthed elected officials and candidates who would have made previous generations blush.
At a rally in Georgia, for example, Trump said everything Biden touches “turns to sh--."
Biden has joined in using expletives too, but behind the scenes according to a February report in Politico which said the president called Trump a "sick f---."
A 2019 Harris X survey found 64% of Americans said it's inappropriate for public officials to use obscene language in public.
When the same polling firm asked a similar question in 2022 on whether Americans were bothered hearing profanity in public just 49% said a lot or some.

[Amati75]

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/p...4/73154714007/

Republican Donald Trump has been open about deliberately using inflammatory words to attract attention in the 2024 presidential race.
If you don't use certain language "that maybe are not very nice words, nothing will happen," the former president said in a March interview with Fox News host Howard Kurtz.
Trump employed that signature tactic during his infamous June 2015 announcement speech when he described some Mexican immigrants as criminals and rapists, which he later admitted was planned.
It is a style that excites his conservative base as a leader who rejects the supposed political correctness imposed by liberal Democrats. But it is something that alarms detractors and frightens experts who described it as an authoritarian-leaning campaign, especially in the aftermath of the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol led by Trump supporters.
"Wake up people. This is an emergency. This is what authoritarian thugs and terrorists do," Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a history professor at New York University and author of "Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present" said in March 29 post on X.
She was referring to Trump sharing a video this past week of a pickup truck that had a decal with President Joe Biden hogtied.
Yet that use of language and imagery is something Trump has intensified in his increasingly personal grudge rematch against Biden this year.
"Your victory will be our ultimate vindication, your liberty will be our ultimate reward and the unprecedented success of the United States of America will be my ultimate and absolute revenge," Trump said during this year's Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in February.
With the campaign now shifting to general election mode, more attention is being paid to Trump's rhetoric on the campaign trail and the use of macabre imagery online to convey his ideas.
Here are some key takeaways to keep in mind.
Sometimes it's direct and profane; other times it is suggestive enough to give the presumptive GOP nominee wiggle room to deny Democratic claims.
But it's always meant to get a reaction, whether from allies or critics, especially on hot button topics such as immigration and crime.
In March alone, Trump raised eyebrows when he said some undocumented migrants coming to the U.S. were "not people." That outrage was matched a few weeks later by those furious when he said Jewish Americans who vote Democratic hate Israel and "their religion."
One of the more pronounced backlashes from liberals this month, however, appeared to play into Trump's hands.
At an Ohio rally, he said the nation would face a “bloodbath” should he lose this November. That remark sent Democrats through the roof, but it was in the context of his call for a strict tariff on Chinese-made cars to protect the U.S. automakers.
"We're going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you’re not going to be able to sell those guys if I get elected," Trump said.
"Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath for the whole – that’s gonna be the least of it. It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That’ll be the least of it."
Part of the reason Democrats, anti-Trump Republicans and political observers pounce on every word out of Trump's mouth is a broader anxiety about the state of American democracy.
This is primarily based on the 2021 Capitol riot, which saw roughly 140 police officers injured and hundreds of other Trump-aligned individuals charged with trying to overturn the 2020 election.
That Trump was the "central cause" of the attack, according to a 2022 House investigative committee report, is often lost in the day-to-day campaign coverage.
It also links backs to his ongoing refusal to admit losing the last presidential contest, which has become a GOP litmus test and further fuels much of the concern about his rhetoric.
As far back as 2016, Trump alluded to "riots" by supporters if he didn't win the Republican nomination. Since then, he often brings up potential violence or uses violent images when either discussing political issues or his multiple court cases.
Trump raised the possibility of "bedlam" overtaking the country in the face of legal challenges to his candidacy; "potential death (and) destruction" when the Manhattan district attorney was pursuing the ongoing hush-money case; and sharing images of him carrying a baseball bat near Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's head in a since-deleted Truth Social post.
One thing that is different about this era of politics is swearing in public is far more acceptable.
When speaking about Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who's prosecuting the Georgia election fraud case against Trump, the former president mocked her name during the Ohio rally, for instance.
"It's spelled ‘fanny,’ like your a--, right?" Trump said. At other times he has dropped four-letter words and worse.
As USA Today reporter Sudiksha Kochi noted, Trump has helped usher a new era of foul-mouthed elected officials and candidates who would have made previous generations blush.
At a rally in Georgia, for example, Trump said everything Biden touches “turns to sh--."
Biden has joined in using expletives too, but behind the scenes according to a February report in Politico which said the president called Trump a "sick f---."
A 2019 Harris X survey found 64% of Americans said it's inappropriate for public officials to use obscene language in public.
When the same polling firm asked a similar question in 2022 on whether Americans were bothered hearing profanity in public just 49% said a lot or some.

Il problema è che ha milioni di fessi non pensanti che lo prendono sul serio…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[paulhowe]

Il problema è che ha milioni di fessi non pensanti che lo prendono sul serio…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I "fessi" non pensanti sono circa la meta del paese, e nello stato dove vivi tu anche un po piu della meta.

Quindi sei venuto a vivere in un paese dove la meta della popolazione sono dei "fessi".



Forse serve che tu faccia le valigie.

O forse serve che tu affini le tue capacita di analisi e di fare logica.

[Amati75]

I "fessi" non pensanti sono circa la meta del paese, e nello stato dove vivi tu anche un po piu della meta.

Quindi sei venuto a vivere in un paese dove la meta della popolazione sono dei "fessi".



Forse serve che tu faccia le valigie.

O forse serve che tu affini le tue capacita di analisi e di fare logica.

come non capire un cazzo e credersi pure furbi… Mica sto dicendo tutti… si parla in contesto… ovvero dei milioni di qanon fessi maga che lo prendono sul serio,sui milioni di nazionalisti cristiani Baptist/evangelici che lo credono scelto da Dio, ecc ecc sul e che quindi attuano di conseguenza.

Tra L altro fossero la completa metà, in cazzo cambierebbe la sostanza?

In nulla, implicherebbe quindi nel caso che la metà della popolazione sarebbe cogliona…. Che per carità … si potrebbe pure stare..

Ma ragiona per una sola volta nella tua bigotta esistenza su, ed evita di parlare al riguardo di
“Ragionare e logica” che a fatica sai come si scrivano “Mr. boat parades”.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[paulhowe]

Mica sto dicendo tutti… si parla in contesto… ovvero dei milioni di qanon fessi maga che lo prendono sul serio,sui milioni di nazionalisti cristiani Baptist/evangelici che lo credono scelto da Dio, ecc ecc sul e che quindi attuano di conseguenza.

E sono circa la meta dell' elettorato. Nelle ultime elezioni Trump ha ottenuto quasi 75 milioni di voti.

Tra L altro fossero la competa metà, in cazzo cambierebbe la sostanza?

No, la sostanza e' che sei venuto a vivere in un paese dove la "meta della popolazione sono dei coglioni...."


Ma ti pare poco!

Tu lavoreresti in un azienda dove la meta dei dipendenti sono dei coglioni? Vorresti avere meta dei membri della tua famiglia che sono dei coglioni?

Non credo.

Quindi o fai le valigie.... o affini meglio le tue capacita di analisi e magari ti rendi conto che "questi coglioni" sono il frutto di 20 anni di politiche assurde.

Fino a che non te ne rendi conto continuerai a fare queste analisi da studente di seconda elementare.

[Amati75]

E sono circa la meta dell' elettorato. Nelle ultime elezioni Trump ha ottenuto quasi 75 milioni di voti.




No, la sostanza e' che sei venuto a vivere in un paese dove la "meta della popolazione sono dei coglioni...."


Ma ti pare poco!

Tu lavoreresti in un azienda dove la meta dei dipendenti sono dei coglioni? Vorresti avere meta dei membri della tua famiglia che sono dei coglioni?

Non credo.

Quindi o fai le valigie.... o affini meglio le tue capacita di analisi e magari ti rendi conto che "questi coglioni" sono il frutto di 20 anni di politiche assurde.

Fino a che non te ne rendi conto continuerai a fare queste analisi da studente di seconda elementare.

1- continui a non comare un cazzo… che novità…
Pensare che te l ho pure spiegato… dato che non ci arrivi

2-che la metà siano coglioni non vedo dove sarebbe il problema, prenditi come esempio, dici d essere un supervisore in un azienda MN e hai capacità logiche , razionali, conoscimento ecc ecc a livello somaro.

Che il mondo poi sia pieno di fessi, mica è una novità, se così non fosse, non ci sarebbero religioni fantasiose ne persone che credono che la terra sia piatta, et similia.

3- Per il resto, mica colpa mia se milioni della
Base di Trump sono:

Qanon
Nazionalisti Cristiani
La porzione con meno educazione
Ecc ecc

Sono semplici fatti.

Quindi dire che ha milioni di fessi che lo stanno a sentire e’ un semplice dato di fatto, se ti senti chiamato in causa, il problema è tuo, non mio.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk