

It's rows upon rows of kings, whores and pawns, and the storm is rolling
The vengeful and the bitter reach out for their fix
Rebels never realized that their angst was a mockery -MGLA-
#Sostieni anche tu don Peppe moderatore del Forum LGBTQI+


Solo le pecore hanno bisogno di leader. La Democrazia richiede partecipazione diretta e assunzione di responsabilità.
Se non stai attento, i mass media ti faranno odiare gli oppressi e amare le persone che opprimono.


It's rows upon rows of kings, whores and pawns, and the storm is rolling
The vengeful and the bitter reach out for their fix
Rebels never realized that their angst was a mockery -MGLA-
#Sostieni anche tu don Peppe moderatore del Forum LGBTQI+


Te vuoi? Ma chissenefrega di quello che vuoi te. Ripeto la domanda, dei links che metto nell'altra discussione te ne fai qualcosa? Sui numeri dei morti in mare rispetto all'Australia che ho postato diverse volte te ne sei fatto qualcosa? Ah no, quelli non li vuoi.
Toh, ecco i numeri. Ora cambierai idea?
https://pagellapolitica.it/fact-chec...tare-in-italia
Non è vero che il 95 per cento degli accolti non ha diritto a rimanere in Italia
Il senatore Aimi ha poi aggiunto che i miliardi spesi per l’immigrazione irregolare riguardano persone che «nel 95 per cento dei casi, non avrebbero titolo alcuno per soggiornare nel Belpaese». Ma come abbiamo scritto di recente – analizzando una dichiarazione molto simile – questo non è vero.
I dati del Ministero dell’Interno sugli esiti delle domande di asilo arrivano fino a luglio scorso. Nei primi sette mesi di quest’anno, in media ogni mese circa il 22 per cento delle richieste di protezione ha avuto una risposta positiva: circa il 12 per cento dei casi ha riguardato persone che hanno ricevuto lo status di rifugiato; circa il 9 per cento la protezione sussidiaria; e circa l’1 per cento la protezione speciale (che è stata di recente modificata dal nuovo decreto “Immigrazione” del governo Conte II).
Dunque – stando alla distinzione fatta da Aimi – sono almeno il 22 per cento del totale dei richiedenti asilo le persone che hanno un «titolo» a rimanere in Italia, dopo la prima richiesta di protezione, e non il 5 per cento. Nel 2019 questa percentuale di circa il 20 per cento era simile, mentre negli anni precedenti – quando era ancora in vigore la protezione umanitaria – i dati erano più alti, superando il 30 per cento e arrivando anche fino al 40 per cento.


Come perculare i poveri accoglioni. Prima arrivi come clandestino in Europa, fai domanda di asilo e poi torni nel tuo paese dal quale sei scappato - IN VACANZA!!
E quando fai notare queste inconguenze ai suddetti idioti sei un razzista.
https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/...-iran-10085930
Asylum seekers who fled Iran to UK on small boats 'return to country on holiday'
"If you're saying you've left the country because it's unsafe and then you're choosing to travel back there it doesn't make sense"
Whistleblowers from asylum accommodation have alleged that three teenage Iranian asylum seekers returned to their home country for a holiday - despite claiming they had fled due to persecution. According to two housing workers, these three Kurdish-Iranian asylum seekers returned to their country of origin on separate occasions, with their trips funded by another migrant.
Following a series of trips last year by teenagers from accommodation in Derbyshire, the two former employees of housing provider Framework claimed their concerns about the young men, all of whom had arrived in Britain via small boat, were "brushed aside." Housing officer Darren Jennings, 50, alleges he was "made to feel like a racist" after deciding to blow the whistle on the holidays, which involved watersports and Eid celebrations.
"If you're saying you've left the country because it's unsafe and then you're choosing to travel back there it doesn't make sense," he told the Express. "The countries they said they were going to have a history of terrorism, people smuggling and drug [trafficking]."
During his monthly check-ups at an asylum seeker accommodation facility, Mr Jennings became concerned when one resident failed to answer his door. He claims the man had returned to Iran to visit his family in April last year for around two months. This, according to Mr Jennings, prompted another Iranian resident to inform him of his plans to return as well.
The housing officer, who stepped down from his role at Framework in July last year, said he had also been told the trips were funded by another asylum seeker in Britain, whose identity remains unknown - saying this raised serious concerns over safeguarding. "These were people who were skint, on benefits but were saying 'we've got the money' from some mysterious individual willing to pay for it," he said.
"I have a daughter the same age and if she came to me and said 'somebody I barely know can pay for me to go to Ibiza for two months' I'm not letting her go. I'm certainly thinking there's something going on there."
Reform UK's Lee Anderson condemned the situation revealed by the Express, insisting that those taking holidays in countries they have fled should be sent back permanently. "Phoney asylum seekers are endemic in Britain," he said, "yet, we have a Labour Government that is bending over backwards to provide them with five-star hotel accommodation and benefits – no questions asked. If their countries are safe enough to vacation in then we should be deporting them, no ifs, no buts."
Weston Walton, another ex-support worker at the Derbyshire residence, echoed Mr Jennings' apprehensions about the men's safety. "I knew of three cases where they went on holiday," he said. "[One of the teens] went for months, it was bizarre. When some staff highlighted the safeguarding risk this was brushed aside."
The teenagers did not journey together, but it is believed that their travel expenses were covered by the same unidentified asylum seeker. The exact dates and routes taken by the three men were not disclosed to the staff.
Mr Walton expressed his concern that, despite Framework receiving £370 per week in enhanced housing benefit for each asylum seeker from UK taxpayers, the organisation was not doing enough to personally check on its residents. Most of the interactions between Framework staff and the asylum seekers under their care are conducted via WhatsApp messages and video calls, rather than face-to-face conversations, according to the Express. In a WhatsApp chat viewed by the Express, one man, who had previously shared videos of himself participating in watersports with staff, accused another support worker of "letting him down" because they had "promised not to say anything" after being informed that his holiday could impact his housing benefit payments.
"I started like kind of doing a bit of due diligence myself and knocking on doors," Mr Walton added. "I realised 'oh my goodness' who's checking upon what we do? If we say someone's there then that just means they are there [when they might not be]. It was a very scary awakening.
"[Framework] were not raising their game to support people in those situations. The [men] were in an extremely vulnerable position," he added.
Mr Jennings raised the alarm through Framework's internal whistleblowing process, as well as notifying other authorities and the police, over concerns that the men's disappearance might indicate benefit fraud. A Home Office spokesperson declined to comment on individual cases, saying: "We take all claims of abuse of the immigration system extremely seriously and will not hesitate to take action where necessary."
Framework also refrained from discussing individual cases, but deputy chief executive Claire McGonigle stated: "These allegations were fully investigated and considered under our Whistleblowing procedures last year. We concluded that all appropriate communication took place with our stakeholders, that appropriate safeguarding responses were made, and that we had shared all relevant information with the local Housing Benefit department."
Ms McGonigle added: "We made repeated attempts to engage with the former staff member who raised these concerns both during their employment and after their resignation. They have been unwilling to accept the findings of our investigations and we are at a loss as to what more we can do to resolve their concerns."
A spokesperson for Derbyshire County Council clarified that they had no "legal power" to stop the trip, so "a partnership, multi-agency safety plan was put in place at the time notification to travel was received. Derbyshire has robust procedures to reduce exploitation risks and legally discharges its statutory duty to support children in care and care leavers.
"The three individuals are all care leavers, over the age of 18, obtained travel documents legally and followed the appropriate Home Office Asylum claim processes," they continued.
Confirming police involvement, a Derbyshire Police spokesperson stated an officer attended a meeting concerning the travel plans of the individuals but "no criminal offences were found". They further mentioned that "were there to be concerns about potential criminal matters, then these would be able to be raised through well-established formal channels that exist between local authorities, and other agencies, in the county."
Addressing the fraud allegation, the spokesperson said: "After meeting with the individual no criminal offences were found to have been reported and no further enquiries were made. It is understood that the individual was not referred to trading standards by the officer that he met with."


Non me ne frega niente delle notizie di cronaca, se affermi qualcosa o hai le prove di quello che dici o confermi che sono cazzate frutto delle tue ossessioni notturne. Scegli.
Dal link che hai postato (almeno leggili prima di postare cazzate).
"Al di là di questa osservazione, abbiamo verificato i dati citati da Aimi, che commette due errori: la spesa per la gestione dell’immigrazione irregolare non è di 5 miliardi all’anno e non è vero che il 95 per cento dei richiedenti asilo non ottiene protezione."
Cum Feris Ferus
Chi striscia non inciampa. Cit.


Giusto, non sia mai che i tuoi sogni bagnati sui migranti vengano sputtanati dalla cronaca, vero?
Ah, se non te ne frega niente della cronaca significa che non te ne frega nulla anche quando crepano in mare?
Vale anche per te quando dai del nazista agli altri?se affermi qualcosa o hai le prove di quello che dici o confermi che sono cazzate frutto delle tue ossessioni notturne. Scegli.
Difatti ho evidenziato proprio cio' che sostenevo: il 22% ha diritto all'asilo, il 78% no. Ora che hai i numeri che fai? Ammetti di essere un cazzaro livoroso pieno di sensi di colpa verso i negher o metterai la tua solita faccina da bimbominchia che non sa cosa rispondere? Scegli.Dal link che hai postato (almeno leggili prima di postare cazzate).
"Al di là di questa osservazione, abbiamo verificato i dati citati da Aimi, che commette due errori: la spesa per la gestione dell’immigrazione irregolare non è di 5 miliardi all’anno e non è vero che il 95 per cento dei richiedenti asilo non ottiene protezione."


Dimentichi quelli che pur non avendo diritto di asilo si inseriscono nel mondo del lavoro. I regolari sono 6 milioni, oltre a quelli che gli schiavisti fanno lavorare in nero. Ti ripeto un consiglio: fatti curare le tue ossessioni.
Cum Feris Ferus
Chi striscia non inciampa. Cit.


Illegalmente dal momento che dovrebbero essere mandati fuori dal paese, piccolo particolare che a quanto pare non ti interessa. Per cui a te sta bene premiare comportamenti illegali, come mai?
Fatti curare la tua ipocrisia. Ah gia' che non vuoi.I regolari sono 6 milioni, oltre a quelli che gli schiavisti fanno lavorare in nero. Ti ripeto un consiglio: fatti curare le tue ossessioni.

