King Robert 1st of Scots, The Bruce, offered them sanctuary in return for support in his struggle with England. Although primary source material has not been found (Scottish state documents were destroyed by both Edward 1st of England and Cromwell in attempts to eliminate the existence of a Scottish state from human history) there is strong circumstantial evidence that it was they who led the charge of Sma' folk at Bannockburn and it was the Knights in cavalry charge, with their distinctive white crosses on their shields, rather than the Sma' folk per se that led the English troops to finally break and run in terror. Certainly if they were coming in only when Scottish victory seemed likely there was some 'bet hedging' deal with Bruce.
Here is where Scotland takes centre stage in the story. Because Robert the Bruce was currently excommunicated, Scotland became one of the very few havens in Europe for Templar Knights. The Templars were never proscribed in Scotland, even after the excommunication was lifted. It is believed that refugee Templars even fought at Bannockburn (as of course did Scotland's resident Templars like the Sinclairs), but the number and extent is once more clouded by the secrecy that so characterises Templar history.
http://www.siliconglen.com/Scotland/11_21.html




Rispondi Citando
