User Tag List

Pagina 3 di 159 PrimaPrima ... 2341353103 ... UltimaUltima
Risultati da 21 a 30 di 1584
Like Tree532Likes

Discussione: Focus Libia

  1. #21
    SuperMod
    Data Registrazione
    26 Mar 2005
    Località
    Gubbio
    Messaggi
    51,148
    Mentioned
    801 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Predefinito re: Focus Libia

    In sostanza abbiamo un generale appoggiato più o meno copertamente (ma nemmeno tanto copertamente) dagli USA (dove del resto ha risieduto per venti anni fino a quando non è tornato nel 2011 in Libia con un esercito privato addestrato dalla CIA) che ha rovesciato armi in pugno il fragile parlamentino e punta ora a diventare il nuovo Gheddafi ma in versione meno autonoma (Gheddafi prima delle sue ultime svolte politicamente era anche lui solo un generale golpista che metteva ordine nel caos tribale poco frenato da una debole monarchia ). il generale Haftar (più o meno eterodiretto) punta probabilmente a rimettere ordine attraverso una dittatura militare con "le cattive" in questa Libia dove negli ultimi tre anni il parlamentarismo pseudo democratico succeduto al regime di Gheddafi (caduta che è del resto stata possibile solo per l'intervento militare esterno francese e paradossalmente di quella stessa amministrazione Obama che ora se ne sta pentendo ) si è dimostrato catastroficamente caotico e del tutto impotente verso le spinte mafiose (il traffico di clandestini gestito dalle potenti cosche mafiose libiche verso l'Italia parte da qui al 90%) tribali e contro l' infiltrazione di Al Qaeda
    Ultima modifica di [email protected]; 19-05-14 alle 16:53

    •   Alt 

      TP Advertising

      advertising

       

  2. #22
    Сардиния
    Data Registrazione
    12 Nov 2009
    Località
    Терранова
    Messaggi
    7,133
    Mentioned
    59 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Predefinito Re: Libia, 79 morti e 141 feriti in scontri a Bengasi

    Occhio che in libia è in atto un golpe militare eteroguidato contro gli islamisti (il Gen. Khalifa Haftar è uomo della Cia). "Qualcuno" appoggia la deriva autoritaria con il pretesto del pericolo islamista ...e non è neppure detto che a noi italiani convenga appoggiare l'aspirante Junta, potrebbe essere il momento di fare una scelta coraggiosa e rendere la pariglia ai cosiddetti "alleati" ...anche se con questo popò di governo illuminato che ci ritroviamo, dubito ci siano molte probabilità in proposito!
    amaryllide likes this.

  3. #23
    Forumista
    Data Registrazione
    20 Jan 2014
    Messaggi
    226
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito Prosegue l’attacco contro gli islamisti di Ansar al-Sharia a Bengasi

    Distrutta la radio del gruppo jihdista legato ad al-Qaeda. Haftar: “distruggeremo chi accusa altri musulmani di essere infedeli”. Bilancio ufficioso degli scontri: 43 morti e 250 feriti


    20140518-ansa-l-sh-660x438


    A Bengasi ieri è proseguito l’attacco condotto dalle milizie guidate dal generale Khalifa Haftar contro il gruppo islamista di Andar al-Sharia e la Brigata martiri del 17 Febbraio. Il presidente della General National Congress (il parlamento libico, ndr), Nuri Abu Sahmain, in una dichiarazione congiunta con il primo ministro ad interim Abdullah Al -Thinni e al Capo di Stato Maggiore della Difesa, generale Jadallah Obeidi, ieri ha condannato le azioni militari intraprese dal generale Khalifa Hafter venerdì scorso.


    Abu Sahmain ha definito “illegale e illegittima” l’azione militare e ha invitato i membri delle forze regolari di Bengasi e la Brigata Martiri 17 Febbraio (che è riconosciuta dallo Stato) ad astenersi dal prendere parte a qualsiasi azione militare non comandata dal governo, aggiungendo che tutto coloro che hanno 20140518-ansar-al-sharia-logo-320x210partecipato alle operazioni – compreso il generale Hafter – saranno perseguiti.


    Secondo i media libici, il generale Hafter, da parte sua, ha confermato il prosieguo dell’operazione “Karama” (dignità) nel corso di una conferenza stampa, durante la quale ha negato la partecipazione all’attacco contro gli islamisti di Bengasi di unità dell’aeronautica militare egiziana. Gli aerei – ha sostenuto il generale considerato golpista da alcuni, salvatore della patria da altri – “sono stati pilotati da militari libici“, schieratisi contro la deriva islamista propugnata nella capitale della Cirenaica da Ansar al-Sharia (che significa “favorevoli alla sharia, la legge islamica, ndr).


    Hafter ha anche affermato che l’obiettivo è di distruggere coloro “che accusano gli altri musulmani di essere infedeli“, confermando la posizione laica ma non contraria di per se all’islam. Poi il generale che ha forti legami con l’intelligence statunitense ha invitato “tutti gli ufficiali e i soldati in tutto il paese a rispondere allo stato di allerta e a unirsi all’azione militare immediatamente“.


    Minacce e appelli che sembrano aver avuto un esito visibile nella forte esplosione che ha distrutto la radio di Ansar al-Sharia, nel quartiere di Leithe, quale passo decisivo per rendere concreata l’azione di “pulizia e purificazione” di Bengasi dagli estremisti islamisti.


    Forse come risposta, ma è un dato non confermato ufficialmente, terroristi hanno attaccato una stazione di polizia a Shara Istiqlal, la ex Nasser Street. L’attacco non ha causato vittime, ma solo danni esterni all’edificio e ad alcune macchie parcheggiate nei pressi.

    La situazione è resa grave dal fatto che Mohamed Hijazi, il portavoce di Hafter (nella foto a sinistra), ha dichiarato ai microfoni di Al-Ahrar TV di non riconoscere il governo e il Parlamento, giudicati troppo teneri verso le attività dei movimenti mafiosi islamici qaedisti. Una legittimità che, sempre secondo Hijazi, il Parlamento e il governo avrebbero perso da tempo.


    Lo stesso colonnello Hijazi aveva creato del panico a Bengasi quando, nella giornata di ieri, aveva chiesto ai residenti di tre quartieri (Gwarsha , Hawari e Sidi Faraj) di procedere all’evacuazione a causa dell’operazione in corso contro Ansar.


    Malgrado le frammentarie notizie provenienti dalla città, sembra che la popolazione abbia risposto all’appello, perché la maggioranza approva l’azione di Haftar contro i jihadisti islamisti, nonostante lo scombussolamento ulteriore della vita della città, in cui i negozi sono rimasti chiusi e la gente rintanata nelle case o evacuata all’esterno.


    L’università è stata chiusa e gli studenti sono stati avvertiti che le sessioni di esame sono sospese, mentre l’aeroporto di Bengasi rimarrà chiuso almeno fino a martedì per non compromettere il traffico aereo civile.


    Sul fronte vittime, fonti ospedaliere hanno aggiornato il bilancio dell’azione militare. Secondo media locali, i morti sarebbero complessivamente 43, mentre i feriti sarebbero 250. Cifre non confermate in via ufficiale, ma ricostruite in base alle indicazioni ricevute dal Medical Centre, dal Jalaa Hospital e dal Marj Hospital di Bengasi.


    L’azione promossa dal generale Hafter dovrebbe continuare anche oggi, domenica 18 maggio.

  4. #24
    Forumista
    Data Registrazione
    15 Nov 2013
    Messaggi
    1,362
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito Re: Prosegue l’attacco contro gli islamisti di Ansar al-Sharia a Bengasi

    distruggeremo chi accusa altri musulmani di essere infedeli

    Sinceramente, non mi riassicura per niente.

  5. #25
    Forumista
    Data Registrazione
    04 Mar 2011
    Località
    bologna
    Messaggi
    289
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito Re: Focus Libia

    Dove sono adesso quei forumisti coglioni come ad esempio Hidetoshi 777 e tanti altri che a suo tempo(febbraio 2011)inneggiavano alla"rivoluzione"Libica anti-Gheddafi e appellavano Nikolas Sarkozy come il"Dio Sarkozy"(sì proprio così,andate rileggervi i suo derilanti post)
    Io l'avevo predetto in tempi NON sospetti come sarebbe finita questa finta"rivoluzione"in realtà solo un colpo di stato con secessione della Cirenaica al seguito ed ora i fatti mi stanno dando pienamente ragione,non ci voleva poi un genio x capirlo.
    ps
    Ora saranno ben felici della tragica situazione Libica!
    un saluto
    Alexfaro

  6. #26
    Klassenkampf ist alles!
    Data Registrazione
    31 May 2009
    Messaggi
    23,118
    Mentioned
    271 Post(s)
    Tagged
    26 Thread(s)

    Predefinito Re: Focus Libia

    Citazione Originariamente Scritto da alexfaro Visualizza Messaggio
    Dove sono adesso quei forumisti coglioni come ad esempio Hidetoshi 777 e tanti altri che a suo tempo(febbraio 2011)inneggiavano alla"rivoluzione"Libica anti-Gheddafi e appellavano Nikolas Sarkozy come il"Dio Sarkozy"(sì proprio così,andate rileggervi i suo derilanti post)
    Io l'avevo predetto in tempi NON sospetti come sarebbe finita questa finta"rivoluzione"in realtà solo un colpo di stato con secessione della Cirenaica al seguito ed ora i fatti mi stanno dando pienamente ragione,non ci voleva poi un genio x capirlo.
    ps
    Ora saranno ben felici della tragica situazione Libica!
    un saluto
    Alexfaro
    sta succedendo esattamente quello che è successo in Ucraina. Quella coglionazza della Merkel pensava di rimettere al potere la Timoshenko, mentre gli yankee hanno manovrato i nazi per "fuck the UE" e mettere il loro pupazzo Yatseniuk, col lavoro sporco delegato a nazi e CIa (ops, no, adesso delegano ai "Privati" di Academi).
    In Libia francesi e inglesi pensavano di aver vinto la guerra, e per l'ennesima volta verranno fottuti dal burattino yankee.
    L'Italia ovviamente è fottuta in entrambi i casi sia dagli uni che dagli altri, ma chi pecora si fa, i lupi se la mangiano, e se sono in calore, se la inc...no anche prima....
    Dogma likes this.

  7. #27
    Forumista
    Data Registrazione
    20 Jan 2014
    Messaggi
    226
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Predefinito Re: Focus Libia

    Citazione Originariamente Scritto da amaryllide Visualizza Messaggio
    sta succedendo esattamente quello che è successo in Ucraina. Quella coglionazza della Merkel pensava di rimettere al potere la Timoshenko, mentre gli yankee hanno manovrato i nazi per "fuck the UE" e mettere il loro pupazzo Yatseniuk, col lavoro sporco delegato a nazi e CIa (ops, no, adesso delegano ai "Privati" di Academi).
    In Libia francesi e inglesi pensavano di aver vinto la guerra, e per l'ennesima volta verranno fottuti dal burattino yankee.
    L'Italia ovviamente è fottuta in entrambi i casi sia dagli uni che dagli altri, ma chi pecora si fa, i lupi se la mangiano, e se sono in calore, se la inc...no anche prima....
    Allora diciamo le cose come stanno, al mondo serve un nuovo Montezuma ed un nuovo Impero Azteco, aridatece Montenzuma!

    Rimpiango l' impero Azteco!

  8. #28
    SuperMod
    Data Registrazione
    26 Mar 2005
    Località
    Gubbio
    Messaggi
    51,148
    Mentioned
    801 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Predefinito Re: Focus Libia

    Citazione Originariamente Scritto da alexfaro Visualizza Messaggio
    Dove sono adesso quei forumisti coglioni come ad esempio Hidetoshi 777 e tanti altri che a suo tempo(febbraio 2011)inneggiavano alla"rivoluzione"Libica anti-Gheddafi e appellavano Nikolas Sarkozy come il"Dio Sarkozy"(sì proprio così,andate rileggervi i suo derilanti post)
    Io l'avevo predetto in tempi NON sospetti come sarebbe finita questa finta"rivoluzione"in realtà solo un colpo di stato con secessione della Cirenaica al seguito ed ora i fatti mi stanno dando pienamente ragione,non ci voleva poi un genio x capirlo.
    ps
    Ora saranno ben felici della tragica situazione Libica!
    un saluto
    Alexfaro
    Ma più che altro: come mai l'intellettuale militante , giornalista , filosofo e scrittore francese (socialista ma grande elogiatore di Sarkozy durante l'intervento militare) Bernard henry Levy che nel 2011 aveva inondato i giornali europei (il Corriere della sera e La stampa li pubbicavano tre volte alla settimana) dei suoi appassionati interventi a favore dell'intervento militare "umanitario e democratico" contro Gheddafi ha improvvisamente smesso di scrivere un rigo che sia uno sulla Libia?
    Ultima modifica di [email protected]; 20-05-14 alle 15:02

  9. #29
    Сардиния
    Data Registrazione
    12 Nov 2009
    Località
    Терранова
    Messaggi
    7,133
    Mentioned
    59 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Predefinito Re: Focus Libia

    ...ho un articolo per te ...emblematico (si legga in particolare le parti in neretto)



    Is General Khalifa Hifter The CIA’s Man In Libya?

    As the United States and its allies get deeper into the confrontation with Qaddafi in Libya, it’s worth stepping back to consider what is actually taking place—and why.We’ve been told very little about the rebels seeking to supplant the dictator. But one in particular deserves our attention. General Khalifa Hifter, the latest person to head the rebel forces.
    There’s been little effort to look at Hifter’s background. One notable exception was the work of the always-diligent McClatchy Newspapers, which briefly inquired about his background in late March. That report does not seem to have generated much additional digging by other news organizations.
    The new leader of Libya’s opposition military spent the past two decades in suburban Virginia but felt compelled — even in his late-60s — to return to the battlefield in his homeland, according to people who know him.
    Khalifa Hifter was once a top military officer for Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, but after a disastrous military adventure in Chad in the late 1980s, Hifter switched to the anti-Gadhafi opposition. In the early 1990s, he moved to suburban Virginia, where he established a life but maintained ties to anti-Gadhafi groups.
    Late last week, Hifter was appointed to lead the rebel army, which has been in chaos for weeks. He is the third such leader in less than a month, and rebels interviewed in Libya openly voiced distrust for the most recent leader, Abdel Fatah Younes, who had been at Gadhafi’s side until just a month ago.
    At a news conference Thursday, the rebel’s military spokesman said Younes will stay as Hifter’s chief of staff, and added that the army — such as it is — would need “weeks” of training.
    According to Abdel Salam Badr of Richmond, Va., who said he has known Hifter all his life — including back in Libya — Hifter — whose name is sometimes spelled Haftar, Hefter or Huftur — was motivated by his intense anti-Gadhafi feelings.
    “Libyans — every single one of them — they hate that guy so much they will do whatever it takes,” Badr said in an interview Saturday. “Khalifa has a personal grudge against Gadhafi… That was his purpose in life.”
    According to Badr and another friend in the U.S., a Georgia-based Libyan activist named Salem alHasi, Hifter left for Libya two weeks ago.
    alHasi, who said Hifter was once his superior in the opposition’s military wing, said he and Hifter talked in mid-February about the possibility that Gadhafi would use force on protesters.
    “He made the decision he had to go inside Libya,” alHasi said Saturday. “With his military experience, and with his strong relationship with officers on many levels of rank, he decided to go and see the possibility of participating in the military effort against Gadhafi.”
    He added that Hifter is very popular among members of the Libyan army, “and he is the most experienced person in the whole Libyan army.” He acted out of a sense of “national responsibility,” alHasi said.
    “This responsibility no one can take care of but him,” alHasi said. “I know very well that the Libyan army especially in the eastern part is in desperate need of his presence.”
    Omar Elkeddi, a Libyan expatriate journalist based in Holland, said in an interview that the opposition forces are getting more organized than they were at the beginning up the uprising. Hifter, he said, is “very professional, very distinguished,” and commands great respect.
    Since coming to the United States in the early 1990s, Hifter lived in suburban Virginia outside Washington, D.C. Badr said he was unsure exactly what Hifter did to support himself, and that Hifter primarily focused on helping his large family.
    So a former Qaddafi general who switches sides is admitted to the United States, puts down roots in Virginia outside Washington, D.C. and then somehow supports his family in a manner that mystifies a fellow who has known Hifter his whole life. Hmm.
    The likelihood that Hifter was brought in to be some kind of asset is pretty high. Just as figures like Ahmed Chalabi were cultivated for a post-Saddam Iraq, Hifter may have played a similar role as American intelligence prepared for a chance in Libya.
    We do need to ask to what extent the Libyan uprising is a proxy battle, with the United States far more involved that it would care to admit. Certainly, Qaddafi has been on the “to-remove” list for a very long time. But after something of a rapprochement, he again became a major irritant in recent years.
    As the New York Times reported, almost in an aside,
    In 2009, top aides to Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi called together 15 executives from global energy companies operating in Libya’s oil fields and issued an extraordinary demand: Shell out the money for his country’s $1.5 billion bill for its role in the downing of Pan Am Flight 103 and other terrorist attacks.
    If the companies did not comply, the Libyan officials warned, there would be “serious consequences” for their oil leases, according to a State Department summary of the meeting.
    …The episode and others like it, the officials said, reflect a Libyan culture rife with corruption, kickbacks, strong-arm tactics and political patronage since the United States reopened trade with Colonel Qaddafi’s government in 2004. As American and international oil companies, telecommunications firms and contractors moved into the Libyan market, they discovered that Colonel Qaddafi or his loyalists often sought to extract millions of dollars in “signing bonuses” and “consultancy contracts” — or insisted that the strongman’s sons get a piece of the action through shotgun partnerships.
    Unfortunately, items like the McClatchy piece and the above extract from a longer Times piece are rarely patched together into a larger analysis of what is going on.
    More detailed examinations of the complex history and interests in play are usually relegated to little-known blogs. For example, the Irish author and journalist Ed Moloney writes about President Obama’s decision to authorize the deployment of CIA agents on the ground in Libya, and notes
    …The rebels are by themselves incapable of dislodging Gaddafi. The allies’ no-fly zone, cruise missile strikes and bombing missions may be sufficient to deny Gaddafi a victory over his rebel opponents but it cannot assure success for the rebels.
    Slowly but surely Obama and his French and British allies are being sucked into direct involvement in yet another project to secure regime change in a Muslim country. The next stage will be to give the rebels sophisticated weapons in the hope this can reverse their decline. The rebels will have to be trained of course, the training must take place in Libya and the trainers will have to be protected, in Libya, by NATO soldiers. Slowly but surely the prohibition against “boots on the ground” will be erased. If, as seems very possible, the acquisition of modern weaponry fails to transform the rebels’ fortunes the only remaining option will be to send NATO troops in against Gaddafi. Failure to remove Gaddafi means a humiliating defeat for Obama and his allies and in the end NATO may have little alternative but to fight on Libyan soil.
    President Obama’s motives in ordering the bombing of Gaddafi’s forces may well have been driven by humanitarian concerns but the appointment of Khalifa Heftir to lead the armed uprising in the oil-rich North African republic, is a reminder that there is a long and tangled history of secret American efforts to oust the Libyan ruler.
    Heftir’s elevation also signals that Obama’s intervention in Libya is now not just about saving civilian lives but is aimed at removing Gaddafi from power, a mission begun a quarter of a century before by a President regarded as an American Conservative icon and supposedly the polar opposite, politically, of the White House’s current resident.
    The story of Khalifa Heftir’s entanglement with the CIA begins with the election to the White House of Ronald Reagan in 1980 amid gradually worsening relations with Gaddafi’s Libya and a growing obsession on the part of Reagan and his allies with removing the Libyan leader.
    Here the story becomes complicated, with lots of names and dates and countries involved. If you don’t have the time or inclination to go further, that’s understandable. The key thing is to appreciate that, as the saying goes, past is prologue. Without understanding what came before, we have no real idea what is happening now, and why. In any case, here’s the back story, which itself is presumably rife with spin and manipulation, and deserves further investigation (the role of Bob Woodward as a principal reporter on these issues, for example, means that the narrative itself may be strategic—see this and this for more on Woodward’s work.)
    A year before Reagan’s election a Libyan mob, imitating Iranian revolutionaries, burned down the US embassy in Tripoli and diplomatic relations were suspended. Two years later the Libyan embassy in Washington was closed down while US and Libyan jets skirmished over the Gulf of Sidra, which Gaddafi claimed to be part of Libya’s territorial waters.
    Later in 1981 American press reports claimed that Libyan hit squads had been sent to the US to assassinate Reagan, shots were fired at the US ambassador to France while the ambassador to Italy was withdrawn after a plot to kidnap him was uncovered. After explosives were found in musical equipment at a US embassy sponsored dance in Khartoum, Sudan, Reagan ordered a travel ban and ordered all Americans out of Libya.
    In 1983 there were more air skirmishes off the Libyan coast; two years later five US citizens were killed by bombs planted at Rome and Vienna airports and US officials blamed Libya. The worst clashes came in 1986, beginning with more air skirmishes over the Gulf of Sidra and the destruction of Libyan SAM sites by American missiles. In April a bomb exploded at the LaBelle nightclub in Berlin, a bar frequented by off-duty American servicemen. Three people were killed, two of whom were US soldiers and of the 200 wounded, sixty were American citizens. President Reagan blamed Libya and on April 15th, some 100 US aircraft, many flying out of bases in the UK, bombed Libyan bases and military complexes. The Libyans said that 70 people were killed in the attacks which also targeted Gaddafi’s compound in Tripoli, killing his adopted infant daughter, Hana. One account claimed that nine of the jets had been directed to blast Gaddafi’s compound in a clear attempt to kill him.
    By the mid-1980’s, the Reagan administration and the CIA believed that Gaddafi was supporting terrorist groups or helping fellow radical states throughout the globe. In a November 3rd, 1985 article for the Washington Post, Bob Woodward listed the countries where Gaddafi was said by the White House to be active. They included Chad, Tunisia, Sudan, Iran, Syria, Ethiopia, Nicaragua, the Philippines, Guatemala, El Salvador, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Lebanon and Iraq. Gaddafi was also supporting the IRA in Northern Ireland and significantly stepped up supplies of arms and cash to the group after a British policewoman was shot dead and diplomats expelled following a confrontation and lengthy siege at the Libyan embassy in London in 1984.
    In May 1984, less than a month after the London embassy siege, gunmen launched rocket and gun attacks against the Tripoli army barracks where Gaddafi’s family compound was located. The initial assault was repulsed and most of the insurgents killed when Libyan tanks shelled the building overlooking the barracks where the gunmen had taken refuge. It was though the most serious challenge to Gaddafi’s hold on power in Libya, made all the more threatening by the fact that it had happened on his doorstep.
    The attack was claimed by a group calling itself the National Front for the Salvation of Libya (NFSL), composed of anti-Gaddafi exiles, some of them supporters of the Idris monarchy overthrown in the 1969 revolution. Claims that the NFSL was at that time supported by US intelligence derive some support from a leak to American newspapers a few days before the attack in Tripoli that President Reagan had recently signed a new directive authorizing US agencies to “take the offensive” against international terrorism by mounting retaliatory or pre-emptive attacks. But the Americans were, at this stage, not directly involved in supporting the exile group’s activities.
    The NFSL was getting aid mostly from Saudi Arabia whose ruling family despised Gaddafi after he had accused them of defiling holy Islamic sites in their country but also from Egypt and Tunisia in whose internal affairs Gaddafi had meddled. Sudan was another sponsor. Gaddafi had tried to foment an uprising against its pro-Western leadership and in response Sudan supplied the NFSL with bases from which the May 1984 attack was planned.
    The Sudanese, according to one account, kept the CIA informed of the plot. CIA Director, William Casey, was heartened by the attack even though it had failed and renewed his efforts to persuade Reagan to authorize specific covert action against the Libyan leader. Casey is said to have remarked: “It proves for the first time that Libyans are willing to die to get rid of that bastard” (p. 85). From thereon the NFSL was put on the CIA’s payroll.
    It was after the unsuccessful effort to kill Gaddafi in his Tripoli compound that Reagan took the intelligence offensive. Bob Woodward revealed Reagan’s move, first in the Washington Post (November 3rd, 1985) and then in his account of Reagan’s secret wars in his book Veil, published in 1987. A secret presidential directive, which Woodward was able to quote, signaled that the exile groups like NFSL would be an important weapon wielded in this campaign against the Libyan leader: “…the exile groups, if supported to a substantial degree, could soon begin an intermittent campaign of sabotage and violence which could prompt further challenges to Qaddafi’s authority.”
    The Reagan directive had listed ten options for action against Gaddafi, which ranged from regime change to economic sanctions, although it was obvious that the operation could only be judged a success if Gaddafi was dislodged: “…no course of action short of stimulating Qaddafi’s fall will bring any significant and enduring change in Libyan policies”, the document read.
    The former French colony of Chad on Libya’s southern border had already been a major battleground in the war between Reagan and Gaddafi and after the 1984 bid to kill the Libyan dictator it assumed even greater importance. Chad had gained independence from France in 1960 but its history for many years thereafter has been one of coups and civil wars, often sponsored by foreign powers using Chad as an arena for their rivalry.
    Libyan interest and activity in Chad pre-dated Gaddafi’s 1969 revolution and centered on a piece of land in Northern Chad called the Aouzou Strip which is rich in uranium and other rare minerals. Gaddafi formed an alliance with the government of Goukouni Wedeye who allowed the Libyans to occupy the strip but in 1982 Wedeye was overthrown by Hissene Habre who was backed by the CIA and by French troops.
    Hebre’s was a brutal regime. During the eight years of his leadership some 40,000 people were estimated to have died in detention or executed. Human Rights Watch observed: “Under President Reagan, the United States gave covert CIA paramilitary support to help install Habre in order, according to secretary of state, Alexander Haig, to ‘bloody Gadafi’s nose’”. Bob Woodward wrote in Veil that the Chadian coup was William Casey’s first covert operation as head of the CIA.
    During the years following Habre’s coup, Gaddafi’s army and the forces of the Chad government, the CIA and French intelligence clashed repeatedly. In March 1987 a force of some 600-700 Libyan soldiers under the command of General Khalifa Haftir was captured and imprisoned. Gaddafi disowned Heftir, presumably in anger at his capture, and the former Libyan General then defected to the major Libyan opposition group, the NFSL.
    A Congressional Research Service report of December 1996 named Heftir as the head of the NFSL’s military wing, the Libyan National Army. After he joined the exile group, the CRS report added, Heftir began “preparing an army to march on Libya”. The NFSL, the CSR said, is in exile “with many of its members in the United States.”
    In 1990 French troops helped to oust Habre and installed Idriss Debry to replace him. According to one account the French had grown weary of Habre’s genocidal policies while the new resident in the White House, George H W Bush did not have the same interest as Reagan had in using Chad as a proxy to damage Gaddafi even though the Libyan leader formed an alliance with Debry.
    A New York Times report of May 1991 shed more light on the CIA’s sponsorship of Heftir’s men. “They were trained” it said, “by American intelligence officials in sabotage and other guerilla skills, officials said, at a base near Ndjamena, the Chadian capital. The plan to use the exiles fit neatly into the Reagan administration’s eagerness to topple Colonel Qaddafi”.
    Following the fall of Habre, Gaddafi demanded that the new government hand over Heftir’s men but instead Debry allowed the Americans to fly them to Zaire. There Libyan officials were given access to the men and about half agreed to return to Libya. The remainder refused, saying they feared for their lives if they went back home. When US financial aid offered to Zaire for giving the rebels refuge failed to materialise they were expelled and sent to Kenya.
    Eventually the Kenyans said the men were no longer welcome and the United States agreed to bring them to America where they were admitted to the US refugee programme. A State Department spokesman said the men would have “access to normal resettlement assistance, including English-language and vocational training and, if necessary, financial and medical assistance.” According to one report the remnants of Heftir’s army were dispersed to all fifty states.
    That was not, however, the end of the Libyan National Army. In March 1996, Heftir returned to Libya and took part in an uprising against Gaddafi. Details of what happened are scant but the Washington Post reported from Egypt on March 26th that travelers from Libya had spoken of “unrest today in Jabal Akhdar mountains of eastern Libya and said armed rebels may have joined escaped prisoners in an uprising against the government….and that its leader is Col. Khalifa Haftar, of a contra-style group based in the United States called the Libyan National Army, the travelers said.”
    The report continued: “The travelers, whose accounts could not be confirmed independently, said they heard that the death toll had risen to 23 in five days of fighting between security forces and rebels, including men who escaped from Benghazi prison thursday and then fled into the eastern mountains.”
    What part the CIA played in the failed uprising and whether the then US president, Bill Clinton had given the operation his approval are not known. By coincidence or not, three months later, Gaddafi’s forces killed some 1200 political prisoners being held in Benghazi’s Abu Simal jail. It was the arrest of the lawyer representing many of the prisoners’ families that sparked the February 17th uprising against Gaddafi and with it, the return of Khalifa Heftir.
    As usual, the back story is complex. Valuable strategic resources abound. There are no good guys. And, as usual, the reporting that commands most of our attention just isn’t very good at helping us understand what is really going on.
    The consequences of an uninformed public...well, we know what those are.



    fontelink: Is General Khalifa Hifter The CIA?s Man In Libya? - Business Insider
    Ultima modifica di Dogma; 20-05-14 alle 15:05

  10. #30
    Сардиния
    Data Registrazione
    12 Nov 2009
    Località
    Терранова
    Messaggi
    7,133
    Mentioned
    59 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Predefinito Re: Focus Libia

    il golpe prende corpo ufficialmente

    ...
    Oggi anche il governo libico ne ha preso atto. E dopo aver negato problemi fino al primo pomeriggio ("é tutto sotto controllo"), in serata ha disposto la sospensione del Parlamento e di qualunque sua attività fino a nuove elezioni, compresa quella di un nuovo premier. L'ultimo nominato, l'imprenditore miliardario Ahmed Miitig, improvvisamente entrato in politica lo scorso 4 maggio con l'appoggio dei fondamentalisti islamici, non é di fatto riuscito a portare alcuna soluzione alla crisi libica. Trasformando, anzi, in un baratro i contrasti tra islamisti e laici.
    Non a caso poco dopo il comunicato governativo un altro comandante militare, Wanis Abu Khamada, capo delle forze speciali libiche, ha dichiarato che gli uomini della sua unità d'élite sono "pronti a combattere contro il terrorismo" e ad affiancare soldati e ufficiali già schierati con Haftar al quale hanno portato in dotazione aerei, elicotteri e pezzi d'artiglieria pesante. Due basi aeree, Tobruk e Benina (Bengasi), erano già passate nella notte con il generale.

    ...



    leggi articolo completo su Ansa.it fontelink

 

 
Pagina 3 di 159 PrimaPrima ... 2341353103 ... UltimaUltima

Tag per Questa Discussione

Permessi di Scrittura

  • Tu non puoi inviare nuove discussioni
  • Tu non puoi inviare risposte
  • Tu non puoi inviare allegati
  • Tu non puoi modificare i tuoi messaggi
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225