Thread contenitore generico sugli USA

[paulhowe]

Ma tu sei un somaro di prima categoria….

Questo è il 68esimo:

https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed68.asp

Somaro… leggilo…. Nulla di quanto ti hai scritto al riguardo e’ affrontato nel 68esimo…

Somaro

Che il 68 sia la descrizione che Hamilton da sulla decisione per l adozione del CE non è la stessa cosa che darti del somaro dato che le ragioni che tu hai elencato centrino un assoluto cazzo con tali ragioni.. somaro.


Ergo, hai dimostrato tutto da solo che NON lo hai mai letto…. Somaro


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Amati ma l'ignoranza fa 1000.

https://www.usgopo.com/federalist-68/

A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations.

The choice of SEVERAL, to form an intermediate body of electors, will be much less apt to convulse the community with any extraordinary or violent movements, than the choice of ONE who was himself to be the final object of the public wishes.

[Amati75]

Amati ma l'ignoranza fa 1000.

https://www.usgopo.com/federalist-68/

Somaro… e cosa c’entra questo con gli Stati…? Somaro…


Ma ti rendi conto che ciò che affermi è smentito da ciò che poi posti ?


Così come cosa centra quanto sopra con quanto detto ?


Poi… al riguardo ti ho già risposto,,, e ti ho messo pure uno screenshot… ma tu sei somaro forte…

Evidente quindi che NON hai mai letto il 68esimo… ma sempre e solo articoli da camera di risonanza…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[paulhowe]

Somaro… e cosa c’entra questo con gli Stati…? Somaro

Riproviamo!

A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations.

that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications

Nelle elezioni recenti, abbiamo visto che il collegio elettorale consente a un candidato di vincere il voto popolare senza tuttavia diventare presidente.


Ma questo non è tanto un prodotto del collegio elettorale quanto più un prodotto del modo in cui gli stati ripartiscono gli elettori.

In tutti gli stati tranne Maine e Nebraska, gli elettori vengono premiati secondo il principio "il vincitore prende tutto". Quindi, se un candidato vince uno stato anche con un margine ristretto, vince tutti i voti elettorali dello stato.

Il sistema “chi vince prende tutto” non è imposto a livello federale; gli Stati sono liberi di distribuire i propri voti elettorali come desiderano.

[alpha12000]

Allora aspettati pure che si continui a fartelo notare.

Se ti arrampichi, se te lo si farà notare.

Abituati.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Non è un problema.

[Amati75]

Riproviamo!








Nelle elezioni recenti, abbiamo visto che il collegio elettorale consente a un candidato di vincere il voto popolare senza tuttavia diventare presidente.


Ma questo non è tanto un prodotto del collegio elettorale quanto più un prodotto del modo in cui gli stati ripartiscono gli elettori.

In tutti gli stati tranne Maine e Nebraska, gli elettori vengono premiati secondo il principio "il vincitore prende tutto". Quindi, se un candidato vince uno stato anche con un margine ristretto, vince tutti i voti elettorali dello stato.

Il sistema “chi vince prende tutto” non è imposto a livello federale; gli Stati sono liberi di distribuire i propri voti elettorali come desiderano.

Non c’entra un cazzo con gli stati.. SOMARO…

Stai cercando appigli come un disperato per giustificare una tua fantasia che ne il 68esimo , ne nessun altro FP, indica come ragione per l adozione del CE…

Non capisci proprio cosa leggi…. Torna a scuola va.

[alpha12000]

1-il sistema è stato modificato varie volte, quindi che sia modificabile e’ una realtà storica… le opinioni sono quindi irrilevanti.

2-non sto dicendo che la mia sia preferibile… non a caso ti ho chiesto di giustificare la tua pozione, cosa che sei invasive di fare… dato che sei cosciente che un cambio in tale senso renderne la tua parte politica perdente… sempre , ceteris paribus.

3-io sono independent, non a caso to ho specificato varie volte che la mia opinione sul voto popolare applica sempre, indipendentemente da chi vinca, ergo no solo quindi lo stai “accusando” di un qualcosa sul
Quale ti ho già risposto, ma lo stai facendo ad minchiam, visto che li accusi del
Contrario di quanto affermato…

Altro?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1a. il sistema delle elettorale per l'elezione del Presidente è stato modificato con il XII e appunto il XXIII ma non hanno realmente cambiato l'impianto del sistema elettorale
1b. ci sono stati diverse modifiche per l'elezione della House, ma non stiamo parlando di questo, e riguardo al XVII se fosse politicamente possibile lo abrogherei
2a. la mia posizione lo ripeto è che la Costituzione istituisce una Repubblica non una democrazia, cambiare il sistema elettorale stravolge lo spirito della Costituzione
2b. in ogni caso si può tranquillamente ipotizzare che i voti elettorali siano attributi per stato solo per i due del Senato e gli altri a chi vince il distretto congressuale, come già avviene in ME e in NE, questo penso sarebbe un onesto compromesso
3. lo so che sei indipendente però voterai Biden anziché Trump (il che ovviamente è legittimo) e è evidente che il GOP di questi anni non ti piace (anche questo è legittimo)

[paulhowe]

Non c’entra un cazzo con gli stati.. SOMARO…

Stai cercando appigli come un disperato per giustificare una tua fantasia che ne il 68esimo , ne nessun altro FP, indica come ragione per l adozione del CE…

Non capisci proprio cosa leggi…. Torna a scuola va.

Ma non sa manco leggere!!!! Incredibile.

Dove avrei scritto che il #68 e' l'origine del sistema elettorale ????

Non ho mai scritto nulla del genere.

O detto che nella confusa discussione che c'era su quale sistema adottare uno delle piu importanti figure Hamilton espresso il suo parere con lo scritto riportato.

Le ragioni per cui e' ancora valido sono grossomodo queste

• Contribuisce alla coesione del Paese richiedendo una distribuzione di sostegno popolare per essere eletto presidente
• Valorizza lo status degli interessi di minoranza
• Contribuisce alla stabilità politica della nazione favorendo il bipartitismo
• Mantiene un sistema federale di governo e rappresentanza

Se un candidato ottiene la maggioranza sostanziale del voto popolare, talel candidato è praticamente certo di ottenere abbastanza voti elettorali per essere eletto presidente.
Nel caso in cui il voto popolare sia estremamente ravvicinato, le elezioni si sposteranno su quello candidato con la migliore distribuzione dei voti popolari (come evidenziato dall'ottenimento del maggioranza assoluta dei voti elettorali); nel caso in cui il Paese sia così diviso che nessuno
ottiene la maggioranza assoluta dei voti elettorali, allora la scelta del presidente passa per impostazione predefinita gli Stati nella Camera dei Rappresentanti.

[alpha12000]

https://www.thestate.com/news/nation...286822415.html

Presidential primaries will be held in five states — Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Kansas and Ohio — on Tuesday, March 19.
But the results will likely be of little consequence in the race for the White House.
Both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump have already received enough delegates to clinch their respective party nominations, which, barring unforeseen circumstances, ensures a rematch of the 2020 election.
Because of this, “these primaries don’t matter for the selection of the presidential candidates,” Robert Shapiro, a professor of government at Columbia University, told McClatchy News.
But, the results could shed light on levels of support for the candidates and their influence in down-ballot contests.
“The presidential vote — and especially votes for candidates other than Biden or Trump — could have symbolic relevance or be signs of weakness in their candidacies,” Shapiro said. “And the relative turnout for each could say something about enthusiasm for them or signs of voter turnout to come.”
Still, by the time the polls close in all five states, it’s likely that “each major party candidate will end up with almost all the delegates,” Paul Beck, an emeritus professor of political science at the Ohio State University, told McClatchy News.
Here’s an overview of the upcoming contests in the five states.
Ohio
In the Ohio Democratic primary, where 127 delegates are on the line, the ballot will feature Biden and U.S. Rep. Dean Phillips, who has already dropped out and endorsed the current president, according to WCPO.
Biden boasts widespread support in the state, garnering the backing of 86% of Democratic voters, according to a March poll from SurveyUSA.
In the Republican primary, where 79 delegates are at stake, Trump will be on the ballot alongside a slew of candidates who have already bowed out: Nikki Haley, Chris Christie, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Ron DeSantis, per WCPO.
The vast majority of Republicans in the state, 83%, back Trump, according to a March poll from Emerson College.
The Republican primary will also also include a widely watched nominating contest in the race to challenge Democratic U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown.
Trump has endorsed businessman Bernie Moreno, while Gov. Mike DeWine endorsed his opponent, state Sen. Matt Dolan.
Moreno is seen as the “more extreme” choice, Alan Abramowitz, an emeritus professor of political science at Emory University, told McClatchy News.
The race “will be an interesting test of Trump’s ability to influence down-ballot contests,” Abramowitz said, adding that it will be “one of the key races in November determining control of the Senate.”
Arizona
Biden will be on Arizona’s Democratic primary ballot alongside Phillips, Marianne Williamson and a string of lesser-known candidates, including Jason Palmer, who won the Democratic primary in American Samoa. Seventy-two delegates are at stake.
Biden is supported by the majority, 65%, of Democratic voters in the state, according to an August poll from Emerson College.
In the Republican primary, where 43 delegates are on the line, Trump will be featured on the ballot along with eight other candidates, including DeSantis, Christie, Haley and Asa Hutchinson.
Trump is backed by the majority of Republicans in the state, according to recent polls.
Illinois
In Illinois’ Democratic primary, where 147 delegates are at stake, Biden will face off against Phillips, Williamson and businessman Frankie Lozada.
In the Republican primary, where 64 delegates are up for grabs, Trump will be joined on the ballot by DeSantis, Haley, Christie and businessman Ryan Binkley.
Illinois will also hold nominating contests for three House seats and other statewide offices.
Kansas
In Kansas’ Democratic primary, where 33 delegates are available, Biden will be on the ballot along with Phillips, Williamson and Palmer. Voters will also have the option to select “none of the names shown.”
In the Republican primary, where 39 delegates are up for grabs, Trump will be on the ballot alongside Trump, DeSantis, Binkley, Haley and “none of the names shown.”
Previous primaries this year have featured options similar to “none of the names shown” — such as “uncommitted” — and have revealed pockets of discontent with both Biden and Trump in a string of states. Democratic activists and officials have pushed voters in multiple states to opt for “uncommitted” as a way to protest Biden’s support for Israel’s war in Gaza.
Florida
Florida’s Democratic primary was canceled due to Biden being the sole candidate put forward by the state party. As a result, all 224 of the state’s delegates were granted to Biden.
Phillips, Williamson and other long shot Democratic candidates criticized the move in December, calling it antidemocratic, according to The Hill.
In the Republican primary, Trump will face off against DeSantis, Binkley, Haley, Ramaswamy and Hutchinson. At stake are 125 delegates.

[alpha12000]

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...he-presidency/



It’s a rematch.
President Biden and former President Trump each hit a key marker last week, clinching enough delegates to become the presumptive nominee of their respective party.
The outcome of the general election will come down to a handful of states, as usual.
The map maintained by The Hill and Decision Desk HQ lists seven contests as toss-ups.
Those key states are Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
In 2020, Biden won six of the seven — the exception being North Carolina — on his way to a 306-232 victory over Trump in the Electoral College.
The seven battlegrounds in aggregate count for 93 Electoral College votes this year.
Trump leads in all seven in current polls.
Here’s the state-by-state breakdown.
Arizona
Arizona was second to Georgia as the tightest race in the nation in 2020. Biden prevailed by about one-third of a percentage point.
The president will struggle to replicate that performance this year, if the current polls are anything to go by.
An Emerson College poll for The Hill and Nexstar last month put Trump up by 3 points in a head-to-head match-up. Trump’s lead grew to 6 points when Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was added as a choice.
A pro-Kennedy super PAC, American Values, claims it has already secured more than enough signatures to get him on the ballot in Arizona.
There are two other factors to consider.
First, Latinos make up a larger share of Arizona’s population than they do in any other battleground state — 33 percent, according to the Census Bureau.
Trump allies contend the former president is making big inroads with this demographic nationally. But in 2020, Biden bested Trump by 28 points among Latino voters, according to the VoteCast survey commissioned by The Associated Press and Fox News.
Second, Arizona could see one of the most dramatic — and polarizing — Senate races in the nation, with left-leaning Rep. Ruben Gallego (D) and fervent Trump backer Kari Lake (R) widely expected to become the major-party nominees.
Such a dramatic Senate battle could nudge up presidential turnout to even higher than expected levels. But it’s not clear who would get an advantage from such a scenario.
Georgia
Georgia has made plenty of political headlines recently, relating to the effort by Trump and his allies to overturn the 2020 result in the state.
Trump faces 10 charges over that push, even after a judge threw out three additional charges against him Wednesday.
Back in 2020, Biden won by about one-quarter of 1 percent in the state.
A CBS News/YouGov poll released this week gave Trump a 3-point edge in a head-to-head match-up.
One-third of Georgians are Black — a significantly higher proportion than in any other battleground state. Obviously, that makes Black voter enthusiasm for Biden critical if he is to have any real shot at holding on.
There is some pessimism in Democratic circles about Georgia, with some strategists arguing that North Carolina presents a more inviting target for Biden this time around.
Four years ago, Biden was the first Democrat to carry Georgia in a presidential election since 1992.
Michigan
Biden carried Michigan with a smidgen of comfort in 2020, defeating Trump by almost 3 percentage points.
In current polling, it is one of the tightest of the battleground states.
The Emerson College/The Hill/Nexstar poll in February found Trump leading by 2 points with just him and Biden on the ballot.
Trump’s edge doubled to 4 points with Kennedy on the ballot. As with Arizona, the pro-Kennedy super PAC contends it has enough signatures to make that happen.
A big warning sign for Biden came in the Democratic primary, when more than 100,000 people voted “uncommitted.”
Michigan is home to more than 200,000 Arab Americans, representing about 2 percent of the state’s population.
If the conflict in Gaza rages on to November, or even close to it, Biden is facing very serious trouble here.
Nevada
No Republican seeking the White House has carried the Silver State since then-President George W. Bush in 2004.
But Trump clearly has a fighting chance.
A Morning Consult/Bloomberg poll last month gave the former president a lead of either 6 points or 7 points — the slightly bigger margin coming if Kennedy is in the race.
Thirty percent of Nevadans are Latino, making the battle within that demographic critical.
Among the seven battlegrounds, Nevada also has the lowest share of the population with a bachelor’s degree or higher — 27 percent, according to the Census Bureau.
That could be good news for Trump, who is markedly stronger among voters without a college education.
North Carolina
This is Biden’s one semirealistic chance to flip a battleground state this year.
Trump won North Carolina by roughly 1 point in 2020. The state’s major cities, notably Charlotte and Raleigh, have seen their populations swell with new arrivals from more Democratic-leaning states in the north.
Black voters will be critical here too, representing 22 percent of the overall population.
The headwinds Biden faces right now make a North Carolina victory look like an uphill climb, however.
A poll this month from Raleigh TV station WRAL and SurveyUSA found Trump leading by 5 points among likely voters.
The wild card could be the gubernatorial race.
North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper (D), ending his second term, cannot run again because of term limits.
Attorney General Josh Stein last week secured the Democratic nomination to try to succeed Cooper.
But the bigger story came with the choice by North Carolina’s Republicans to nominate Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson.
Robinson’s history includes a series of controversial remarks about the Holocaust, describing “homosexuality” as “filth,” and suggesting that God has ordained that Christians should be “led by men.”
Could moderate suburbanites come out to thwart Robinson and, in the process, nudge up Biden’s chances? It’s at least possible.
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania is the biggest prize of the seven battlegrounds, with 19 Electoral College votes up for grabs.
Trump leads by 4 points in the latest Emerson poll for The Hill and Nexstar. A poll a few days prior for Fox News put the margins tighter, including a dead heat between Biden and Trump if Kennedy is on the ballot.
Pennsylvania was one of three Democratic ‘blue wall’ states Trump demolished in 2016 against Hillary Clinton, becoming the first Republican presidential nominee to win there since 1988.
Biden carried the Keystone State by roughly 1 point four years ago.
People older than 65 make up a slightly larger share of the population in Pennsylvania than any other battleground. The state is also 75 percent white. Both factors should make it fertile ground for Trump.
But it’s also a state Biden has a real affinity for, given that it’s adjacent to his home state of Delaware.
This could be the decisive battle in November.
Wisconsin
Wisconsin was the narrowest Midwest win for Biden in 2020, where he scraped home by about half a percentage point.
It has fewer nonwhite voters than any other battleground, with Latinos representing roughly 8 percent of the population and African-Americans 7 percent.
The most recent Hill/Nexstar poll puts Trump up by 3 or 4 points, depending on the Kennedy ballot access question.
The state has a relatively strong history for Democrats in the recent past. Gov. Tony Evers (D) won reelection in 2022, and Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D) is seeking a third term in November.
Still, Trump should not be underestimated. He beat Clinton in Wisconsin in 2016, becoming the first Republican presidential candidate to carry the state since 1984.

[alpha12000]

https://people.com/us-marine-corps-n...tyhose-8609147

The U.S. Marine Corps has made a change to its dress code for women.
Earlier this week, the Armed Forces branch announced that women in the Marines will no longer be required to wear pantyhose with their uniform skirt.
"Effective immediately, the wear of hosiery with skirts is optional," the Marines Corps wrote in a statement.
But, should pantyhose be worn with a skirt, it must be "skin tone harmonizing," the Marines said. Meanwhile, dark hosiery may still be worn under dress slacks, the organization added.
In a statement to PEOPLE, Maj. Joshua Larson, a spokesperson for the Office of the Commandant of the Marine Corps, said the hosiery requirement was changed because it didn't "pass a 'common sense' test."
"As part of the Marine Corps' Talent Management initiative that began in 2021, then Assistant Commandant Gen. Eric M. Smith, who was the Talent Management officer for the Marine Corps, provided guidance to assess current Marine Corps policies to determine if any policies were either outdated or didn't pass a 'common sense' test," Larson said. "Within the spirit of common sense, our Uniform Board recommended a change to the policy that required women to wear hosiery with skirts. Hosiery is now optional."
"The Marine Corps prioritizes its people above all things," he continued. "Our leaders know, at an instinctual level, that we have a sacred and personal responsibility to lead, mentor, and care for our Marines.
Larson added: "Talent Management drives us to make better institutional decisions and policies for our Marines and their families."
Though women had previously fought in two world wars, they weren't officially considered a permanent part of the regular Marine Corps until June 1948, when Congress passed the Women's Armed Services Integration Act, according to Marine Corps University.
Women currently make up 5% of the more than 175,000 active duty members of the Marine Corps, the organization adds, with 93% of all occupational fields and 62% of all positions now open to women.