Il suicidio del fracking

[Metabo]

Peccato per te e per la "coppia che scoppia Animale Metabo" che l'economia USA non dipende in alcun modo dagli shales di petrolio, che rappresentano un attivita del tutto marginale.

La crescita del pil USA decolla con il prezzo del petrolio basso

Solo per gli unici posti di lavoro di ben pagati degli ultimi anni.

[paulhowe]

Solo per gli unici posti di lavoro di ben pagati degli ultimi anni.

Metabo tu sei un cazzaro di primaria grandezza e non conosci quindi la realta americana.

La stragrande maggioranza della popolazione non vive nel nord dakota o nel west texas, dove ci stanno i pozzi di shales.

La quasi totalita della popolazione non vende, produce o esporta petrolio.

Lascia perdere e pensa alla russia, che sta ormai economicamente affondando.

[Metabo]

Metabo tu sei un cazzaro di primaria grandezza e non conosci quindi la realta americana.

La stragrande maggioranza della popolazione non vive nel nord dakota o nel west texas, dove ci stanno i pozzi di shales.

La quasi totalita della popolazione non vende, produce o esporta petrolio.

Lascia perdere e pensa alla russia, che sta ormai economicamente affondando.

Vallo a dire a F. William Engdahl

[paulhowe]

Vallo a dire a F. William Engdahl

No, non ho bisogno di dirlo a nessuno....mi basta leggere qualche numero, e guardare la cartina geografica.....dalla quale vedo che la quasi totalita degli americani non vivono accanto ai pozzi di shales, ne vendono, ne producono, ne esportano petrolio.

L'economia USA cresce a ritmi del 3-4% all'anno quando il greggio e'basso, e si creano quindi milioni di posti di lavoro.

La cosa contraria avviene in russia.

[Amati75]

Solo per gli unici posti di lavoro di ben pagati degli ultimi anni.

Questo e' un mito:


The biggest private employment increase in 17 years was driven by gains among above-average paying jobs, dispelling the popular notion that the U.S. is turning into a nation of fast-food workers.
Industries that pay employees more than the average for all workers accounted for 66 percent of total jobs created in 2014, based on data compiled by Bloomberg from Labor Department records. Business services -- staffing agencies, accountants, consultants and computer-system designers -- and goods producers, including construction firms and manufacturers, were among those hiring the most.


The pickup indicates the high-flying jobs that were hit hardest during the worst recession in the post-World War II era are making a comeback as the economic expansion gathers momentum. An unexpected slump in wage growth last month had raised some concern that increases in employment were skewed toward lower-paying occupations.
“The reality is really quite different,” said Eric Green, head of rates and economic research at TD Securities USA LLC in New York. “The destruction of these high-paying jobs was much more pronounced in the downturn, but the acceleration off the bottom has been much more pronounced also.”
Employers excluding government agencies paid workers $24.57 per hour on average in December compared with $24.62 the previous month, according to figures from the Labor Department. That depressed the advance over the past year to 1.7 percent, the smallest since late 2012, from 1.9 percent in November.


Biggest Share

Business services, which pay $29.27 an hour on average, accounted for almost 26 percent of the 2.86 million increase in non-government jobs, the most since 1997, according to figures from the Labor Department. Goods producers, paying $25.81, accounted for 18 percent of the new jobs, and education and health-care firms, where workers earn $24.89, contributed 17 percent.
High-paying jobs now make up the same share of total employment as in 2007, before the recession began, according to Green’s calculations.
The idea that low-paying jobs make up the bulk of recent job gains “has a certain amount of appeal because it may explain why earnings are so weak,” Green said. “But the mix is still quite positive.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Carlos Torres in Washington at ctorres2@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Vince Golle at vgolle@bloomberg.net Mark Rohner

Jobs Machine in U.S. Created More Than Burger Flippers Last Year - Bloomberg

[Amati75]

Appena schiatta lo shale gas usa, risale il petrolio.

Segretario OPEC: prezzo del petrolio potrebbe salire fino a 200 dollari


© Foto: AP/Hasan Jamali


Il Segretario generale dell’OPEC Abdalla el-Badri crede che i prezzi del petrolio potrebbero salire a 200 dollari a barile, se i produttori cominceranno a ridurre i loro investimenti.



In un anno il prezzo del barile è calato del 54% con effetti negativi sugli investimenti. Lo ha dichiarato un portavoce dell’Agenzia Internazionale dell’Energia (AIE). Secondo le stime dell’Agenzia, gli investimeti nel settore petrolifero potrebbero diminuire di 100 miliardi di dollari.
Nella visione di el-Badri, le quotazoni del petrolio hanno già quasi raggiunto il fondo e prossimamente ricominceranno a salire.

Petrolio, OPEC, Economia, attualita, Attualita'

• Condividi:
• 

Commenti


Per saperne di più: Segretario OPEC: prezzo del petrolio potrebbe salire fino a 200 dollari - Notizie - Attualita' - La Voce della Russia

Ed anche questo e' un mito.... al presente il segmento Shale andra' incotrno ad una consolidazione, ma risalendo i preziz ritornano ad essere convenienti l eproduzioni anche di aziende meno efficenti, gfigurarsi quelle che riescono ad operare anche ai prezzi attuali.

La produzione shale puo' essre fermata e riavviata in breve tempo, difatti coem fatto notare a vari post, viene considerata piu coem una produzine manufatturiera piuttosto che estrattiva, ovvero il concetto del factory floor, quindi in un periodo di prezzi bassi, i siti piu' costosi possono essere fermati, alla ripresa dei prezzi, in poco tempo riavviati,, i che implcia che vi sara' da ora in avanti una barriera di limita massimo in termini di prezzi per il Petrolio (ovviamente al netto della voce inflazione).


Quindi stando a quello che si puo' capire , tu credi che semplicemente non ci saranno piu' produzioni shale? Giusto?

Eh mi sa che anche qeusta previsione di toccherra' continuare a rinviarla al futoro come le altre, facnedo fitna che tu non l'abbia mai fatta.

[Amati75]

Interessante articolo:

HOUSTON (Reuters) - Collapsing crude prices are confronting scores of smaller U.S. oil producers with the grim choice of either shutting older high-cost wells or burning through cash in the hope of riding out the downturn.
As oil prices fell by more than half over the last six months from more than $100 per barrel, the U.S. oil industry responded by slowing its blistering growth and dialing back expansion plans.
Now, with U.S. crude around $46 a barrel, operators are already closing some small old wells, known as strippers, and tens of thousands of similar wells are on the verge of losing money. A further slide could, by some estimates, idle an equivalent of up to 2 percent of U.S. supply, slowing overall output growth more than expected or even leaving it flat.
Ray Lasseigne, an oilfield veteran and president of TMR Exploration Inc in Louisiana, is deciding which wells to close. TMR looks to close old wells, which produce so much saltwater that disposal costs exceed what the oil can fetch today.
Other running costs include repairs and electricity to run the pump jacks, also known as nodding donkeys because they bob up and down while pulling oil out of the ground.
"We've identified about 20 of our wells that are not economic at these prices," said Lasseigne. That figure represents about 10 percent of the Bossier City, Louisiana company's wells, he said.
His most expensive stripper wells need oil around $70 to be profitable.
NERVES AND FEAR

Leslie Tipping, a longtime member of the oil industry profession known as "landmen" who broker mineral rights, said some marginal wells have already been closed.
"There have been some wells that have been shut in already," she said.
Tipping, who manages oil and gas interests for patrons of the bank Northern Trust in Texas, said she was fielding more calls from clients who are nervously watching sliding crude prices.
"Most of our clients have inherited these assets, so they've been through this before," said Tipping. "But there's concern. There's some fear."
She expects well closures at higher-cost fields across much of North America, including older parts of North Dakota's Bakken, and areas where the geology is difficult, such as the Anadarko Basin in Kansas and Oklahoma.
There are about 400,000 stripper wells in the United States, most with operating costs of between $20 and $50 per barrel, according to analysts at Wood Mackenzie, a leading energy and commodities consultancy. The cheapest ones are in locations where there is little underground saltwater.
Strippers often produce just a few barrels a day, but together they account for up to 1 million barrels per day, a ninth of U.S. output.
Not all stripper wells are losing money now and those that do may not be shut in. This is in part because producers can lose their leases forever if they shut wells for more than a few months, so owners are often willing to pump at a loss and store oil until prices rise.
"At $40, we think you have got about 100,000 to 200,000 barrels per day at risk" from U.S. stripper wells, said RT Dukes of Wood Mackenzie.
That could represent a dent of up to 2 percent dent in output compared with U.S. Energy Information Agency forecasts that this year's U.S. production will average 9.3 million bpd.
After production hit 9.1 million bpd in late 2014, the agency now expects production to climb to 9.42 million bpd around the middle of this year, then ebb to 9.26 million bpd at year's end.
Its latest Jan. 13 outlook forecasts the 2015 average price of the Brent crude global benchmark at $58 a barrel and the U.S. benchmark at $3-4 below that.
Some warn the slowdown could be more pronounced given the sharp drop in the number of rigs drilling new wells. The prevailing industry view, however, is that new, more productive, shale oil wells in Texas, North Dakota and Colorado will keep output rising.

CHEAPER SHALE

Those wells, which typically do not need constant pumping to make oil flow, have helped U.S. crude output to nearly double since 2007.
They have also prompted OPEC and Saudi Arabia to let prices fall in what is widely seen as an attempt to force U.S. rivals to cut output.
But publicly-traded shale oil companies talk of cash operating costs between $10 and $30 a barrel, suggesting oil prices would have to fall by another third to force them consider well closures.
The upshot? It might take a prolonged slowdown in drilling of new wells to significantly curb U.S. supply.
Break even levels for drilling new wells in most U.S. shale oil fields range between $50 and $80 per barrel - well above operating costs for existing shale wells.
In response to the price slump, most oil companies have already cut drilling budgets by 25 percent or more, but they are still sinking new wells. Furthermore, unlike small stripper well operators, several producers have hedged much of their 2015 output at prices close to $90 a barrel, keeping lots of their new output profitable.
Vast efficiency gains also mean that more oil can be squeezed from fewer new wells. For example, EOG Resources Inc said in November that output of new fracked wells in the Eagle Ford shale of Texas was up 39 percent compared with wells sunk at the start of 2014.
"To me, it's going to be extremely difficult for any U.S. production to be cut significantly," TMR's Lasseigne said about the possible impact of well closures.
(Reporting By Anna Driver and Terry Wade; Editing by Tomasz Janowski)





Collapsing Oil Prices Are Forcing Small Producers To Shut Down Wells - Business Insider

[paulhowe]

Metabo e Anticomunista vi consiglia il "rublo".......per intanto nella citta di Amati

[nordista]

Grazie per il video, ma i nostri vendolbersaniani (cioè un gradino sotto li idioti) al massimo arrivano a un monolocale a Cesenatico.

[animal]

Questa foto dovrebbe fare capire cosa significhi il fracking....un bubbone un cancro per il territorio.
Ma se a voi va bene cosi' in nome del dio dollaro.

Poi riguardo ai vari mantra degli ameriCani si ricorda che l'aumento dell'occupazione negli ultimi 6 anni e' avvenuto solamente negli stati interessati dal fracking. Quindi ora c'e' da aspettarsi 200.000-300.000 a spasso a breve...contenti voi. Festeggeranno le vostre dannate borse.
Ma neanche le banche possono stare molto contente. 500-600 miliardi di sofferenze e prestiti probabilmente non restituibili, faranno un bel danno al sistema.....

Ma tanto per voi non c'e' nessun problema perche'il fracking e' un' industria manifatturiera, e si possono chiudere e fare ripartire gli impianti a piacimento.
Non sarei cosi' sicuro.
Magari a 200 usd/bbls potra' ritornare ancora remunerativo ( nel breve termine) il ripristino dei pozzi...ma se poi i vari Allah...al..sadam ..baram etc..insomma l'Opec decidessero di ripetere il giochetto aumentando la produzione...chi si prende il rischio di finanziare a fondo perduto gli assatanati cercatori di oro nero? Chi???